Effect of Surface Roughness of Cold-rolled Steel Sheet on Phosphate Performance
摘 要
不同表面粗糙度的冷轧板进行磷化处理后, 采用T1000粗糙度仪对基板表面粗糙度进行测定, 通过脱膜法、扫描电镜、摩擦试验机对磷化膜膜重、表面形貌、摩擦系数和耐磨性进行了研究。结果表明, 基板表面粗糙度对磷化膜膜重影响不大; 表面粗糙度较小, 则形成的磷化膜均匀致密且粒径较小, 磷化膜摩擦系数相对较大, 耐磨性相对较差; 反之若表面粗糙度较大, 则形成的磷化膜相对疏松粒径较大, 磷化膜表面摩擦系数较小, 耐磨性较好。
Abstract
Cold-rolled steel sheets with different surface roughness were phosphatized. The surface roughness was tested by T1000 roughness tester, the weight of the phosphate coating was measured by removing the coating by chemical method. Scanning electron microscopy(SEM) and friction testing were used to characterize the performance of the phosphate coating, including the surface morphology, the friction coefficient and wear resistance. The results show that the substrate surface roughness has little effect on the weight of the phosphate coating. The smaller the surface roughness of the substrate is, the more uniform the phosphate coating is and the smaller the size of the particles is, however, the friction coefficient is relatively larger and the wear resistance is relatively poorer, and vice versa.
中图分类号 TG178
所属栏目 应用技术
基金项目
收稿日期 2013/7/1
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
备注郝晓东(1979-), 高级工程师, 博士后, 从事镀层技术开发和工程技术转化工作,
引用该论文: HAO Xiao-dong,LIU Xin,ZHANG Jian,ZHANG Qi-fu. Effect of Surface Roughness of Cold-rolled Steel Sheet on Phosphate Performance[J]. Corrosion & Protection, 2014, 35(4): 387
被引情况:
【1】刘迎新,余取民,王开丽, "免水洗常温锰系磷化膜的制备与性能",腐蚀与防护 36, 1153-1155(2015)
【2】生 海,杨建炜,曹建平,许 静,高立军,刘立伟, "冷轧IF钢板表面状态对磷化膜质量的影响",腐蚀与防护 37, 966-969(2016)
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】HAIYAVEL S, VENKATESAN A. The wear characteristics of heat treated manganese phosphate coating applied to AlSi D2 steel with oil lubricant[J]. Tribology in Industry, 2012, 34(4):247-254.
【2】TOTIK Y. The corrosion behaviour of manganese phosphate coatings applied to AISI 4140 steel subjected to different heat treatments[J]. Surface & Coating Technology, 2006, 200(6):2711-2717.
【3】陈义庆, 徐小连, 李天统, 等. 冷轧家电板磷化后耐蚀性能的影响因素[J]. 腐蚀科学与防护技术, 2010, 22(1):61-63.
【4】陈义庆, 徐小连, 武裕民, 等. 冷轧汽车板表面状态对磷化膜质量的影响[J]. 鞍钢技术, 2010(3): 13-16.
【5】陈艳秋. 汽车白车身磷化处理过程控制[J]. 辽宁化工, 2008, 37(2): 106-108.
【6】昌福全. 影响汽车车身磷化因素的探讨[J]. 电镀与涂饰, 2006, 25(3): 29-31.
【7】陈义庆, 徐小连, 李天统, 等. 表面粗糙度对冷轧钢板磷化质量的影响[J]. 腐蚀与防护, 2011, 32(9): 697-700.
【8】陈义庆, 徐小连, 李天统, 等. 表面状态对冷轧家电板磷化效果的影响[J]. 鞍钢技术, 2008(6): 21-24.
【2】TOTIK Y. The corrosion behaviour of manganese phosphate coatings applied to AISI 4140 steel subjected to different heat treatments[J]. Surface & Coating Technology, 2006, 200(6):2711-2717.
【3】陈义庆, 徐小连, 李天统, 等. 冷轧家电板磷化后耐蚀性能的影响因素[J]. 腐蚀科学与防护技术, 2010, 22(1):61-63.
【4】陈义庆, 徐小连, 武裕民, 等. 冷轧汽车板表面状态对磷化膜质量的影响[J]. 鞍钢技术, 2010(3): 13-16.
【5】陈艳秋. 汽车白车身磷化处理过程控制[J]. 辽宁化工, 2008, 37(2): 106-108.
【6】昌福全. 影响汽车车身磷化因素的探讨[J]. 电镀与涂饰, 2006, 25(3): 29-31.
【7】陈义庆, 徐小连, 李天统, 等. 表面粗糙度对冷轧钢板磷化质量的影响[J]. 腐蚀与防护, 2011, 32(9): 697-700.
【8】陈义庆, 徐小连, 李天统, 等. 表面状态对冷轧家电板磷化效果的影响[J]. 鞍钢技术, 2008(6): 21-24.
相关信息