Fault Diagnosis and Elimination of Cathodic Protection System for Long-distance Buried Pipelines
摘 要
某长输埋地管道由于受外界干扰、防腐蚀层破损等原因,管道阴保电位出现欠保、过保及异常波动的现象。采用Fluke数字万用表、直流电压梯度测量法(DCVG)等埋地管道非开挖无损评价技术(NDE),对阴极保护系统进行了全面检测和诊断。结果表明,管道沿线测得的阴保电位有些超出了阴保电位准则范(-850~-1 200 mV,CSE); 有些管段阴保电位频繁异常波动; 防腐蚀层检测出多处破损点,而且部分腐蚀活性呈阳性。研究发现,某混凝土穿越段采用套管保护,管道沿线周围存在电厂、电力铁路等,多处与埋地管线出现并行或者交叉情况。针对阴保电位屏蔽、杂散电流干扰等问题,提出了补加牺牲阳极、合理选择排流方式等解决措施。
Abstract
Due to outside interference, coating damage and other factors, the cathodic protection potentials of pipelines are often less protected, over-protected and unusually fluctuate and so on. By using Fluke digital multi-meter potential measurement, DC voltage gradient measurement (DCVG) and pipeline current mapper (PCM) and other non-excavation of buried pipeline NDE techniques, a comprehensive on-site fault detection and diagnosis was done for the cathodic protection system for a long-distance buried oil pipeline. Besides, the located soil corrosion and the coating of the buried pipeline were tested and assessed. The results showed that the cathodic protection potentials measured from some potential test piles along the pipeline were beyond the cathodic protection potential criterion range (from -850 to -1 200 mV,CSE). Some cathodic protection potentials of the pipeline showed frequent abnormal fluctuations, multiple damage points of coating were detected, and some exhibited positive corrosion activity. The results showed that a section crossing under the concrete used the casing protection, high-speed rail and so on were built later and located nearby the pipeline, there was paralleling or crossing somewhere. The cathodic protection potential shielding, stray current interference and other issues were discussed, and reasonable drainage measures and sacrificial anode were proposed.
中图分类号 TG174.4
所属栏目 应用技术
基金项目
收稿日期 2014/3/16
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
联系人作者王树立(wsl@cczu.edu.cn)
备注王树立(1957-),教授,从事油气管道腐蚀与防护研究,
引用该论文: ZHANG Yong-fei,ZHAO Shu-hua,LI Ping,WANG Shu-li,LI En-tian,YANG Yan. Fault Diagnosis and Elimination of Cathodic Protection System for Long-distance Buried Pipelines[J]. Corrosion & Protection, 2014, 35(11): 1168
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】W.V.贝克曼等著. 阴极保护手册(第三版)[M]. 胡士信等译. 北京:化学工业出版社,2005.
【2】胡士信,路民旭,杜艳霞,等. 管道交流腐蚀的新观点[J]. 腐蚀与防护,2010,21(6):419-424.
【3】李自力,孙云峰,杜绍凯,等. 交流电气化铁路杂散电流对埋地管道电位影响规律[J]. 腐蚀与防护,2011,32(3):177-181.
【4】唐德志,杜艳霞,路民旭,等. 埋地管道交流干扰与阴极保护相互作用研究进展[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报,2013,33(5):351-356.
【5】董亮,路民旭,杜艳霞,等. 埋地管道交流腐蚀的研究进展[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报,2011,31(3):173-178.
【6】张玉星,杜艳霞,路民旭,等. 动态直流杂散电流干扰下埋地管道的腐蚀行为[J]. 腐蚀与防护,2013,34(9):771-774.
【7】董亮,杜艳霞,路民旭,等. 油气输送站场内外阴极保护系统间干扰数值模拟[J]. 石油学报,2013,34(2):393-400.
【8】杜艳霞,张国忠. 储罐底板外侧阴极保护电位分布的数值模拟[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报,2006,26(6):346-350.
【9】涂明跃,葛艾天. 山景观道外腐蚀直接评价(ECDA)实践[J]. 腐蚀与防护,2007,28(7):369-372.
【10】沙宝良. 埋地管道的防腐参数采集传输与防腐性能评价[D]. 大庆:东北石油大学硕士学位论文,2013:1-90.
【11】朴贞花,袁赓,童高田. 埋地套管中钢质燃气管道的腐蚀与防护[J]. 煤气与热力,2005,25(5):21-23.
【12】胡士信. 阴极保护工程手册[M]. 北京:化学工业出版社,1999.
【13】R·温斯顿·里维著. 尤利格腐蚀手册(第二版)[M]. 杨武等译. 北京:化学工业出版社,2005.
【2】胡士信,路民旭,杜艳霞,等. 管道交流腐蚀的新观点[J]. 腐蚀与防护,2010,21(6):419-424.
【3】李自力,孙云峰,杜绍凯,等. 交流电气化铁路杂散电流对埋地管道电位影响规律[J]. 腐蚀与防护,2011,32(3):177-181.
【4】唐德志,杜艳霞,路民旭,等. 埋地管道交流干扰与阴极保护相互作用研究进展[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报,2013,33(5):351-356.
【5】董亮,路民旭,杜艳霞,等. 埋地管道交流腐蚀的研究进展[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报,2011,31(3):173-178.
【6】张玉星,杜艳霞,路民旭,等. 动态直流杂散电流干扰下埋地管道的腐蚀行为[J]. 腐蚀与防护,2013,34(9):771-774.
【7】董亮,杜艳霞,路民旭,等. 油气输送站场内外阴极保护系统间干扰数值模拟[J]. 石油学报,2013,34(2):393-400.
【8】杜艳霞,张国忠. 储罐底板外侧阴极保护电位分布的数值模拟[J]. 中国腐蚀与防护学报,2006,26(6):346-350.
【9】涂明跃,葛艾天. 山景观道外腐蚀直接评价(ECDA)实践[J]. 腐蚀与防护,2007,28(7):369-372.
【10】沙宝良. 埋地管道的防腐参数采集传输与防腐性能评价[D]. 大庆:东北石油大学硕士学位论文,2013:1-90.
【11】朴贞花,袁赓,童高田. 埋地套管中钢质燃气管道的腐蚀与防护[J]. 煤气与热力,2005,25(5):21-23.
【12】胡士信. 阴极保护工程手册[M]. 北京:化学工业出版社,1999.
【13】R·温斯顿·里维著. 尤利格腐蚀手册(第二版)[M]. 杨武等译. 北京:化学工业出版社,2005.
相关信息