Improving of TOPSIS Method and Its Application in Engineering Materials Comprehensive Evaluation
摘 要
用垂直距离代替欧氏距离, 并对垂直距离加权, 对传统理想解法进行了改进; 并以航空航天用电绝缘材料的选择为例, 从功能性角度出发, 选择了8个评价指标, 运用改进后的理想解法对5种经过初选的候选材料进行了综合评价。结果表明: 石英玻璃的加权垂直距离最小, 是最佳的候选材料, 评价结果正确; 改进后的理想解法不仅解决了传统方法的不足, 而且更好地体现了不同候选材料的优劣差异, 物理含义更加明确, 分析问题更全面、客观, 是工程选材的一种工具。
Abstract
Technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) was improved, through replacing euclidean distance with vertical distance and adding weight to vertical distance. Taking the choice of electric insulating materials used in aerospace engineering as an example, 5 kinds of candidate materials were comprehensively evaluated by improved TOPSIS according to 8 kinds of assessment indexes selected from the point of functionality. The results show that the weighted vertical distance of quartz glass was the shortest, which meant it was the best candidate material, and the evaluate results were correct. Improved TOPSIS resolved the shortcoming of the conventional TOPSIS, showed the different situation of candidate materials better, and displayed a clear physical implication, with which the analysis was more comprehensive and objective. Hence, improved TOPSIS was a tool for making decision in engineering material selection.
中图分类号 TB3
所属栏目 物理模拟与数值模拟
基金项目 甘肃省教育厅科研基金项目(1111B-03、0511-04)
收稿日期 2011/2/14
修改稿日期 2011/9/11
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
备注陈奎(1978-), 男, 江苏盐城人, 副教授, 博士。
引用该论文: CHEN Kui,ZHANG Tian-yun,YAN Na,WANG Xiu-li. Improving of TOPSIS Method and Its Application in Engineering Materials Comprehensive Evaluation[J]. Materials for mechancial engineering, 2012, 36(2): 96~99
陈奎,张天云,闫娜,王秀丽. 理想解法的改进及其在工程材料综合评价中的应用[J]. 机械工程材料, 2012, 36(2): 96~99
被引情况:
【1】张天云,陈 奎,徐晓玲,郑小平, "工程材料评价指标体系的构建方法",机械工程材料 40, 6-9(2016)
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】BOREA M D, GALLARDO A. The influence of impact assessment methods on materials selection for eco-design [J]. Materials and Design, 2006, 27:209-215.
【2】张天云, 杨瑞成, 任国军. 基于相关系数的工程材料评价指标定量分析[J]. 机械工程材料, 2009, 33(4):97-100.
【3】张天云, 刘涛, 康玉虎. 工程选材组合评价模式研究及其应用[J]. 材料导报, 2009, 23(5):74-77.
【4】OLSON D L. Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models [J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2004, 40(7/8): 721-727.
【5】SHANIAN A, SACADOGO O. TOPSIS multiple-criteria decision support analysis for material selection of metallic bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte fuel cell [J]. Materials and Design, 2006, 159(2): 1095-1104.
【6】ZHANG T Y, YANG R C. Application of distance evaluation and its improved algorithms in engineering material selection [J]. Key Engineering Materials, 2007, 358: 2758-2761.
【7】SHYUR H J. COTS evaluation using modified TOPSIS and ANP [J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2006, 177:251-259.
【8】华小义, 谭景信. 基于“垂面”距离的TOPSIS 法——正交投影法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2004 (1): 114-119.
【9】法拉格M M. 工程材料及加工选择[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 1985.
【2】张天云, 杨瑞成, 任国军. 基于相关系数的工程材料评价指标定量分析[J]. 机械工程材料, 2009, 33(4):97-100.
【3】张天云, 刘涛, 康玉虎. 工程选材组合评价模式研究及其应用[J]. 材料导报, 2009, 23(5):74-77.
【4】OLSON D L. Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models [J]. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2004, 40(7/8): 721-727.
【5】SHANIAN A, SACADOGO O. TOPSIS multiple-criteria decision support analysis for material selection of metallic bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte fuel cell [J]. Materials and Design, 2006, 159(2): 1095-1104.
【6】ZHANG T Y, YANG R C. Application of distance evaluation and its improved algorithms in engineering material selection [J]. Key Engineering Materials, 2007, 358: 2758-2761.
【7】SHYUR H J. COTS evaluation using modified TOPSIS and ANP [J]. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2006, 177:251-259.
【8】华小义, 谭景信. 基于“垂面”距离的TOPSIS 法——正交投影法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2004 (1): 114-119.
【9】法拉格M M. 工程材料及加工选择[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 1985.
相关信息