Feasibility Study on the Replacement of PT with MT in CPR1000 PWR Nuclear Power Plants
摘 要
CPR1000压水堆核电厂大量采用铁磁性材料,表面缺陷检查基本采用渗透检测技术。在确定的试验环境条件和参数下,通过对BOSS焊缝、90°角焊缝、搭接焊缝以及小型部件(异形件)分别采用磁粉检测和渗透检测进行对比试验,探讨磁粉检测技术替代渗透检测技术的可行性。试验结果表明,在铁磁性材料工件上,磁粉检测比渗透检测对缺陷的灵敏度和检出率更高,操作时间更短,缺陷显示的形貌更完整且不扩散。因此,在铁磁性材料工件上用磁粉检测替代渗透检测是可行和可靠的。
Abstract
In CPR1000 PWR nuclear power plants, many devices are made of ferromagnetic materials, whose surface defects inspection usually uses the liquid penetration examination. Under the determined environmental conditions and parameters, comparison tests between PT and MT for BOSS welds, 90 ° fillet welds, lap welds, and shaped pieces are carried out respectively, in order to study the feasibility of the replacement of PT with MT. The experimental results show that, for the workpieces made of ferromagnetic materials, MT has a higher detection rate of defects, higher detection sensitivity, and a shorter operating time than PT, and the defective display of MT is more complete and nondiffusible. Therefore, the replacement of PT with MT is feasible and reliable.
中图分类号 TG115.28
所属栏目 实践经验
基金项目
收稿日期 2012/8/27
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
备注彭志珍(1985-),男,助理工程师,主要从事压水堆核电站核岛设备无损检测工作。
引用该论文: PENG Zhi-Zhen,TANG Xi-Ming,LI Ping. Feasibility Study on the Replacement of PT with MT in CPR1000 PWR Nuclear Power Plants[J]. Nondestructive Testing, 2013, 35(8): 73~75
彭志珍,唐西明,李平. CPR1000压水堆核电厂磁粉检测替代渗透检测的可行性探讨[J]. 无损检测, 2013, 35(8): 73~75
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】谢杰,李平,彭志珍.CPR1000压水堆核电站在役检查用无损检测方法的优化[C]//中国电机工程学会年会论文集.贵州:[s.n],2011.
【2】宋志哲.磁粉检测[M]. 北京: 中国劳动社会保障出版社,2007.
【3】胡学知.渗透检测[M]. 北京: 中国劳动社会保障出版社,2007.
【4】魏鹏宇.铁磁性容器的渗透与磁粉检测方法比较[J].无损检测,2009,31(5):415-416.
【5】JB/T 4730-2005 承压设备无损检测[S].
【2】宋志哲.磁粉检测[M]. 北京: 中国劳动社会保障出版社,2007.
【3】胡学知.渗透检测[M]. 北京: 中国劳动社会保障出版社,2007.
【4】魏鹏宇.铁磁性容器的渗透与磁粉检测方法比较[J].无损检测,2009,31(5):415-416.
【5】JB/T 4730-2005 承压设备无损检测[S].
相关信息