FRACTURE ANALYSIS OF 73.0 mm EU J55 TUBING JOINT
摘 要
对断裂油管短节和新油管短节材质进行了对比试验,并对所用吊卡和油管接箍主要配合尺寸进行了测量和分析,发现吊卡磨损之后承载面孔径变大,油管接箍承载面本身偏小。根据尺寸测量结果,推断出了油管断裂时与吊卡的非正常配合状态。对油管断裂时的受力状态分析结果认为油管短节失效过程为:接箍一侧承载面滑入磨损的吊卡承载面内孔里边,管体倾斜与吊卡上活门体下端面内圆弧棱相撞产生裂纹和变形,最后在偏斜拉伸和冲击载荷共同作用下断裂。
Abstract
The macro-fracture and micro-fracture of broken tubing joint were analyzed,the material properties of fracture tubing joint and the new tubing joint were compared by testing. It was found that tubing elevator face borne was worn severely,and its bore diameter was larger than that specified in standard,and the shoulder dimension of tubing joint coupling that bears the weight of the tubing string was smaller than that specified in standard by measuring dimension of broken tubing joint and the tubing elevator. The load borne on tubing joint was discussed based on the test result of fracture morphology analysis,material property and dimension measurement. According to test and analysis result,it is concluded that the tubing joint broke process as the follows: one side of the coupling face borne load slipped into the bore of the elevator,then cracked and deformed because tubing joint is inclined and stroke with down circularity arc edge of the elevator bore,and finally broke due to impact load and deflexion tension load.
中图分类号 TE931+.2
所属栏目 质量控制与失效分析
基金项目
收稿日期 2007/6/7
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
备注吕栓录(1957-),男,教授级高级工程师。
引用该论文: L Shuan-lu,YUAN Peng-bin,WEI Mao-zhi,SONG Shun-ping,TANG Fei,WU Tian-ling. FRACTURE ANALYSIS OF 73.0 mm EU J55 TUBING JOINT[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis part A:Physical Testing, 2008, 44(12): 715~718
吕拴录,袁鹏斌,魏茂质,宋顺平,唐 飞,吴天灵. 73.0 mm EU J55油管短节断裂原因分析[J]. 理化检验-物理分册, 2008, 44(12): 715~718
被引情况:
【1】吕拴录,李元斌,冯春,练以锋,丁毅,黄世财,李金凤,王鹏,路彩虹, "某井油管接箍开裂原因分析",理化检验-物理分册 50, 149-154(2014)
【2】王双来,杜志杰,彭娜, "某井油管变扣短节断裂原因分析",理化检验-物理分册 51, 730-732(2015)
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】API SPEC 5CT-2001 套管和油管规范[S].
【2】API SPEC 8C-1997 钻井与采油提升设备规范[S].
【2】API SPEC 8C-1997 钻井与采油提升设备规范[S].
相关信息