Case Study on Interference Effect of DC Stray Currents on Natural Gas Pipelines
摘 要
采用试片断电法和电位监测系统,对广东地区的某天然气管道进行24 h的通/断电电位检测和长期监测,发现管道存在明显的直流杂散电流干扰。电位检测和监测结果分析表明:广东地区的天然气管道同时存在高压直流输电系统不平衡电流、单极大地回路电流和地铁杂散电流干扰;管段由于直流杂散电流的干扰,造成阀室内绝缘卡套放电烧蚀、恒电位仪内部元器件烧毁、恒电位仪无法正常运行以及全线管道的不同位置均有管体腐蚀发生。管体腐蚀最严重的位置腐蚀深度已经达到3.69 mm,此位置管道在高压直流接地极输电系统单极大地运行模式时受干扰严重管道电位能达到-174.6 V。同时,由于高压直流输电系统的不平衡电流和地铁杂散电流的叠加干扰,造成管道长时间处于欠保护状态,多个因素共同作用综合造成此段管道腐蚀严重。
Abstract
Using test piece power-off method and potential monitoring system, 24 h on/off potential detection and long-term monitoring of a natural gas pipeline in Guangdong area were carried out, and it was found that there was obvious direct current (DC) stray current interference in the pipeline. The potential detection and monitoring results show that the natural gas pipelines in Guangdong had unbalanced current, single-maximal loop current and subway stray current interference. Due to the interference of DC stray current, the tube segment was ablated, the internal components of potentiostat were burned out, the potentiostat could not operate normally, and the tube corrosion occurred at different positions of the pipeline. The corrosion depth of the pipe with the most serious corrosion reached 3.69 mm. In this position, the pipe was disturbed by the pipeline in the single-maximum operation mode of high-voltage direct current (HVDC) grounding transmission system, and the pipeline potential could reach -174.6 V. At the same time, due to the superimposed interference of the unbalanced current of HVDC transmission system and the stray current of subway, the pipeline was in an under-protected state for a long time, and the combination of several factors caused the corrosion of this section of the pipeline to be severe.
中图分类号 TG172 DOI 10.11973/fsyfh-201809013
所属栏目 应用技术
基金项目
收稿日期 2018/3/25
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
引用该论文: ZHOU Junfeng,TAN Haichuan,ZHANG Xin,GAO Rongzhao,SONG Yingying,GE Caigang. Case Study on Interference Effect of DC Stray Currents on Natural Gas Pipelines[J]. Corrosion & Protection, 2018, 39(9): 713
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】程明,张平. 鱼龙岭接地极入地电流对西气东输二线埋地钢质管道的影响分析[J]. 天然气与石油,2010,28(5):22-27.
【2】孙建桄,曹国飞,韩昌柴,等. 高压直流输电系统接地极对西气东输管道的影响[J]. 腐蚀与防护,2017,38(8):631-636.
【3】楚金伟,韦晓星,刘青松. 直流接地极附近引压管绝缘卡套放电原因分析[J]. 油气田地面工程,2015,34(10):73-74.
【4】孟庆思,杜艳霞,董亮,等. 埋地管道地铁杂散电流干扰的测试技术[J]. 腐蚀与防护,2016,37(5):355-359.
【5】刘振宇,付山林. 地铁杂散电流对地下燃气管道的干扰影响[C]//全国埋地管线腐蚀控制和监测评估工程技术交流会. 吉林:[出版者不详],2007.
【2】孙建桄,曹国飞,韩昌柴,等. 高压直流输电系统接地极对西气东输管道的影响[J]. 腐蚀与防护,2017,38(8):631-636.
【3】楚金伟,韦晓星,刘青松. 直流接地极附近引压管绝缘卡套放电原因分析[J]. 油气田地面工程,2015,34(10):73-74.
【4】孟庆思,杜艳霞,董亮,等. 埋地管道地铁杂散电流干扰的测试技术[J]. 腐蚀与防护,2016,37(5):355-359.
【5】刘振宇,付山林. 地铁杂散电流对地下燃气管道的干扰影响[C]//全国埋地管线腐蚀控制和监测评估工程技术交流会. 吉林:[出版者不详],2007.
相关信息