Influence Factors on Measurement of Specified Plastic Elongation Strength for Hot-Dip Galvanized Sheets
摘 要
针对两个试验室测定热镀锌薄板规定塑性延伸强度存在差异的情况,讨论了拉伸应变测量方式、试样夹持状态、原始横截面积测量等因素对规定塑性延伸强度测定结果的影响。结果表明:试验室A直接以横梁位移来代替试样的变形量,这与Rp0.2的测定原理不符,导致出现测定结果比真实值低的情况;彩涂后试样的规定塑性延伸强度较未彩涂试样的偏低,主要原因是彩涂试样夹持段打滑;在试样实际厚度呈负公差的情况下,以名义尺寸输入试样的原始横截面积尺寸,使得强度值较实测尺寸的偏低。
Abstract
In view of the differences between the two laboratories for testing the specified plastic elongation strength of the hot-dip galvanized sheet, the effects of measurement method of tensile strain, clamping state of sample and measurement of original cross section area on the measurement results of specified plastic elongation strength were discussed. The results show that the deformation of the sample was replaced directly by the beam displacement in the laboratory A, which was not in conformity with the test principle of Rp0.2, caused the measurement results to be lower than the true value. The specified plastic elongation strength of the samples after color coating were lower than that of the non-coated samples, mainly due to the slipping of the clamp section of the color coating samples. In the case of the negative tolerance of the actual thickness of the samples, the original cross section area of the samples were input in nominal size, so that the strength value was lower than the measured size.
中图分类号 TG115.5+2 DOI 10.11973/lhjy-wl201809008
所属栏目 专题报道(拉伸试验)
基金项目
收稿日期 2018/6/26
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
备注历妍(1983-),女,工程师,硕士,主要从事钢铁力学性能检测和实验室质量管理工作,192055@baosteel.com
引用该论文: LI Yan,WANG Yilei. Influence Factors on Measurement of Specified Plastic Elongation Strength for Hot-Dip Galvanized Sheets[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis part A:Physical Testing, 2018, 54(9): 653~656
历妍,王毅磊. 热镀锌薄板规定塑性延伸强度测定的影响因素[J]. 理化检验-物理分册, 2018, 54(9): 653~656
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】陈冬,金向雷. 中国热镀锌技术及发展动向[J]. 河北冶金,2004(3):3-8.
【2】黄永智,李运刚. 热镀锌及锌合金技术的发展概述[J]. 电镀与精饰,2012,34(2):21-25.
【3】田广明. 试样加工对金属材料拉伸性能的影响[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2011,47(6):365-367.
【4】李和平. 关于拉伸试验标准GB/T 228.1-2010主要争论问题的探讨[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2016,52(9):597-602.
【5】潘淑杰,郑建平,祝铁柱,等. 从拉伸速率对塑性延伸强度的影响解读拉伸试验标准[J]. 冶金分析,2012,32(z1):492-494.
【6】乐金涛,李玲,刘乐,等. 对拉伸试验方法标准GB/T 228.1-2010的思考[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2015,51(2):83-86.
【7】余立,李荣锋,凃应宏. 试验机柔度对拉伸试验结果的影响[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2013,49(8):501-504.
【8】丁阳,顾佳磊,谢晓宇. 引伸计对不同材料屈服强度测试值的影响[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2018,54(3):175-180.
【2】黄永智,李运刚. 热镀锌及锌合金技术的发展概述[J]. 电镀与精饰,2012,34(2):21-25.
【3】田广明. 试样加工对金属材料拉伸性能的影响[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2011,47(6):365-367.
【4】李和平. 关于拉伸试验标准GB/T 228.1-2010主要争论问题的探讨[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2016,52(9):597-602.
【5】潘淑杰,郑建平,祝铁柱,等. 从拉伸速率对塑性延伸强度的影响解读拉伸试验标准[J]. 冶金分析,2012,32(z1):492-494.
【6】乐金涛,李玲,刘乐,等. 对拉伸试验方法标准GB/T 228.1-2010的思考[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2015,51(2):83-86.
【7】余立,李荣锋,凃应宏. 试验机柔度对拉伸试验结果的影响[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2013,49(8):501-504.
【8】丁阳,顾佳磊,谢晓宇. 引伸计对不同材料屈服强度测试值的影响[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2018,54(3):175-180.
相关信息