Effects of Strain Rate Control on Static Tensile Properties of Metallic Materials
摘 要
探讨了不同速率控制模式对金属材料拉伸性能的影响,指出了名义速率与实时反馈速率会存在差异。对于连续屈服材料,引伸计反馈的速率ėLe与根据横梁位移速率和试样平行长度估算的应变速率ėLc差异不大;对于不连续屈服材料,弹性段反馈的应变速率ėLe远低于根据试样平行长度估算的应变速率ėLc,出现屈服平台后ėLe高于ėLc,屈服后均匀变形阶段ėLe与ėLc基本相等。不同试验速率及控制模式下,应变速率增大,载荷增加率增大,滑移线贯穿整个晶粒的难度增加,从而使测得的Rp0.2和ReL增加,Rm基本上处于稳定状态,试样断口的韧窝尺寸减小,试样的位错密度增加,断后伸长率降低,塑性应变比无明显变化,应变硬化指数降低。
Abstract
The effects of different rate control modes on the tensile properties of metal materials were discussed. It is pointed out that there are differences between nominal rate and real-time feedback rate. For continuous yielding materials, the rate of extensometer feedback ėLe is not significantly different from the strain rate ėLc estimated from the beam displacement rate and the parallel length of the sample. For discontinuous yielding materials, the strain rate of elastic section feedback ėLe is much lower than the strain rate ėLc estimated by the parallel length of the sample, then ėLe is higher than ėLc after yielding platform, and the two are substantially equal during the uniform deformation phase after yielding. Under the different test rates and control modes, with the increase of strain rate, the load increase rate increases, the difficulty of slip lines extending through the entire grain increases, so that the measured Rp0.2 and ReL increase, Rm is basically in a stable state, the dimple size of the sample fracture decreases, the dislocation density of the sample increases, the elongation after fracture decreases, the plastic strain ratio does not change significantly, and the strain hardening index decreases.
中图分类号 TG115.5+2 DOI 10.11973/lhjy-wl201908010
所属栏目 试验与研究
基金项目
收稿日期 2018/6/28
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
备注张有为(1983-),男,工程师,硕士,主要从事理化检验工作,icy131@163.com
引用该论文: ZHANG Youwei. Effects of Strain Rate Control on Static Tensile Properties of Metallic Materials[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis part A:Physical Testing, 2019, 55(8): 555~560
张有为. 应变速率控制对金属材料静载拉伸性能的影响[J]. 理化检验-物理分册, 2019, 55(8): 555~560
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】苏英群,潘媛媛,韩永明,等. 三种控制方式在GB/T 228.1-2010中的正确应用[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2014,50(2):83-88.
【2】梁新邦,李久林. GB/T 228-2002《金属材料室温拉伸实验方法》实施指南[M]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2002.
【3】丁阳,顾佳磊,谢晓宇,等. 引伸计对不同材料屈服强度测试值的影响[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2018,54(3):175-180.
【4】李和平,周星,徐惟诚,等. GB/T 228.1-2010中应力速率的三种理解及在宣贯和实施过程中出现的问题[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2013,49(8):489-493.
【5】王春华,郑文龙. 关于GB/T 228.1-2010拉伸速率之方法B的探讨[J]. 工程与试验,2015,55(增刊1):7-10.
【2】梁新邦,李久林. GB/T 228-2002《金属材料室温拉伸实验方法》实施指南[M]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2002.
【3】丁阳,顾佳磊,谢晓宇,等. 引伸计对不同材料屈服强度测试值的影响[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2018,54(3):175-180.
【4】李和平,周星,徐惟诚,等. GB/T 228.1-2010中应力速率的三种理解及在宣贯和实施过程中出现的问题[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2013,49(8):489-493.
【5】王春华,郑文龙. 关于GB/T 228.1-2010拉伸速率之方法B的探讨[J]. 工程与试验,2015,55(增刊1):7-10.
相关信息