Application Example of Risk Assessment in Oil Pipeline Rerouting Roject
摘 要
以某成品油管道改线工程为例,辨识该管道改线工程的高后果区(HCAs),确定HCAs的危险等级;选取腐蚀、第3方破坏、误操作、本体因素和管理5个一级指标构建输油管道失效可能性评估指标体系,划分3个管段,运用博弈论赋权法计算各指标权重,确定该管道失效可能性;借助CFD软件分析管道泄漏后油蒸汽扩散规律。结果表明:该管道改线工程HCAs等级整体处于Ⅱ级,管段2失效可能性较大,造成管道失效的主要因素为第3方破坏和腐蚀,随着风速增大油蒸汽的扩散范围变大但含量减小。评估结果与实际情况相符合,为管道改线工程风险评估应用研究提供了一定依据。
Abstract
According to a refined oil pipeline rerouting project, identified the high consequence area (HCAs) of the pipeline rerouting project and determined the risk level of HCAs. The evaluation index system of failure probability of oil pipeline was established by selecting five first level indexes:corrosion, third-party damage, misoperation, ontology factor and management. Three segments of the pipeline were divided, and the weight of each index was calculated by game theory weighting method to determine the failure probability of the pipeline. With the help of CFD software, the rule of oil vapor diffusion after pipeline leakage was analyzed. The results show that the HCAs grade of the pipeline rerouting project was in grade II as a whole, and the pipeline segment 2 was more likely to fail. The main causes of pipeline failure were the third-party damage and corrosion. With the increase of wind speed, the diffusion range of oil vapor increase, but the content decrease. The assessment results were in accordance with the actual situation, which provided a certain basis for the application of risk assessment of pipeline rerouting project.
中图分类号 X937 DOI 10.11973/lhjy-wl202006009
所属栏目 实践经验
基金项目 河南省市场监督管理局科技计划项目(2018zj73)
收稿日期 2020/3/16
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
备注张海营(1967-),男,高级工程师,主要从事特种设备风险评估及损伤机理研究,hngj_zlglb@163.com
引用该论文: ZHANG Haiying,ZHAO Xiangnan,LIAN Shuang,ZHANG Jingfei. Application Example of Risk Assessment in Oil Pipeline Rerouting Roject[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis part A:Physical Testing, 2020, 56(6): 33~38
张海营,赵向南,廉爽,张景飞. 输油管道改线工程风险评估应用实例[J]. 理化检验-物理分册, 2020, 56(6): 33~38
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】张圣柱,吴宗之. 油气管道风险评价与管理[M]. 北京:化学工业出版社,2016.
【2】许谨,邵必林,吴琼. 肯特法在长输管道安全评价中的改进研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2014,24(1):109-112.
【3】宁树正,韩亮,朱世飞,等. 基于AHP的灰色聚类法的煤中铝、镓资源评价体系[J]. 煤炭学报,2016,41(2):316-323.
【4】赵嶷飞,万俊强. 基于集对分析的航空公司安全风险评估研究[J]. 安全与环境学报,2018,18(5):1711- 1715.
【5】陈玉超,蒋宏业,吴瑶晗,等. 基于Bow-tie模型的城镇输油管道风险评价方法研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(4):148-152.
【6】GUO X Y,ZHANG L B,LIANG W,et al. Risk identification of third-party damage on oil and gas pipelines through the Bayesian network[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2018,54:163-178.
【7】XU J,FENG P,YANG P. Research of development strategy on China's rural drinking water supply based on SWOT-TOPSIS method combined with AHP-entropy:a case in Hebei Province[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences,2016,75(1):1-11.
【8】许宏良,殷苏民. 基于改进BP神经网络优化的管道腐蚀速率预测模型研究[J]. 表面技术,2018,47(2):177-181.
【9】黄亮亮,姚安林,鲜涛. 考虑脆弱性的油气管道风险评估方法研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2014,24(7):93-99.
【10】于红岩,季申佳. 基于FAHP的加权组合模型预测精度检验与比较[J]. 统计与决策,2017(23):74-78.
【11】周亚薇,张振永,田姗姗. 地区等级升级后的天然气管道定量风险评价技术[J]. 天然气工业,2018,38(2):112-118.
【12】帅健,单克. 基于失效数据的油气管道定量风险评价方法[J]. 天然气工业,2018,38(9):129-138.
【13】张华兵. 基于失效库的在役天然气长输管道定量风险评价技术研究[D]. 北京:中国地质大学(北京),2013.
【14】姚安林,赵忠刚,张锦伟. 油气管道风险评估质量评价技术[J]. 天然气工业,2013,33(12):111-116.
【15】王晓霖,帅健,宋红波,等. 输油管道高后果区识别与分级管理[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2015,25(6):149-154.
【16】张圣柱,吴宗之,张健,等. 油气管道选线和风险评价相关法规与方法[J]. 油气储运,2012,31(9):663-669.
【17】帅义,帅健,苏丹丹,等. 基于DEA的输油管道高后果区管理效能评价[J]. 油气储运,2017,36(3):255-262.
【18】URBINA A G,AOMAYA A,CHOI Y. A polynomial neural network approach for improving risk assessment and industrial safety[J]. Icic Express Letters,2018,12(2):97-107.
【19】姜璐,梁伟,仇经纬. 基于Flunt的埋地原油管道泄漏事故后果分析[J]. 安全与环境学报,2017,28(1):199-203.
【20】ZHU H,LIN P,PAN Q. A CFD(computational fluid dynamic) simulation for oil leakage from damaged submarine pipeline[J]. Energy,2014,64(1):887-899.
【21】姚志强. 埋地原油管道油品泄漏扩散三维数值模拟[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(6):132-136.
【22】BRAMBILLA S,MANCA D. On pool spreading around tanks:Geometrical considerations[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2008,158(1):88-99.
【23】MUHLBAUER W K. Pipeline risk management manual[M]. Houston:Gulf Publishing Company,2004.
【2】许谨,邵必林,吴琼. 肯特法在长输管道安全评价中的改进研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2014,24(1):109-112.
【3】宁树正,韩亮,朱世飞,等. 基于AHP的灰色聚类法的煤中铝、镓资源评价体系[J]. 煤炭学报,2016,41(2):316-323.
【4】赵嶷飞,万俊强. 基于集对分析的航空公司安全风险评估研究[J]. 安全与环境学报,2018,18(5):1711- 1715.
【5】陈玉超,蒋宏业,吴瑶晗,等. 基于Bow-tie模型的城镇输油管道风险评价方法研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术,2016,12(4):148-152.
【6】GUO X Y,ZHANG L B,LIANG W,et al. Risk identification of third-party damage on oil and gas pipelines through the Bayesian network[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2018,54:163-178.
【7】XU J,FENG P,YANG P. Research of development strategy on China's rural drinking water supply based on SWOT-TOPSIS method combined with AHP-entropy:a case in Hebei Province[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences,2016,75(1):1-11.
【8】许宏良,殷苏民. 基于改进BP神经网络优化的管道腐蚀速率预测模型研究[J]. 表面技术,2018,47(2):177-181.
【9】黄亮亮,姚安林,鲜涛. 考虑脆弱性的油气管道风险评估方法研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2014,24(7):93-99.
【10】于红岩,季申佳. 基于FAHP的加权组合模型预测精度检验与比较[J]. 统计与决策,2017(23):74-78.
【11】周亚薇,张振永,田姗姗. 地区等级升级后的天然气管道定量风险评价技术[J]. 天然气工业,2018,38(2):112-118.
【12】帅健,单克. 基于失效数据的油气管道定量风险评价方法[J]. 天然气工业,2018,38(9):129-138.
【13】张华兵. 基于失效库的在役天然气长输管道定量风险评价技术研究[D]. 北京:中国地质大学(北京),2013.
【14】姚安林,赵忠刚,张锦伟. 油气管道风险评估质量评价技术[J]. 天然气工业,2013,33(12):111-116.
【15】王晓霖,帅健,宋红波,等. 输油管道高后果区识别与分级管理[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2015,25(6):149-154.
【16】张圣柱,吴宗之,张健,等. 油气管道选线和风险评价相关法规与方法[J]. 油气储运,2012,31(9):663-669.
【17】帅义,帅健,苏丹丹,等. 基于DEA的输油管道高后果区管理效能评价[J]. 油气储运,2017,36(3):255-262.
【18】URBINA A G,AOMAYA A,CHOI Y. A polynomial neural network approach for improving risk assessment and industrial safety[J]. Icic Express Letters,2018,12(2):97-107.
【19】姜璐,梁伟,仇经纬. 基于Flunt的埋地原油管道泄漏事故后果分析[J]. 安全与环境学报,2017,28(1):199-203.
【20】ZHU H,LIN P,PAN Q. A CFD(computational fluid dynamic) simulation for oil leakage from damaged submarine pipeline[J]. Energy,2014,64(1):887-899.
【21】姚志强. 埋地原油管道油品泄漏扩散三维数值模拟[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术,2015,11(6):132-136.
【22】BRAMBILLA S,MANCA D. On pool spreading around tanks:Geometrical considerations[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2008,158(1):88-99.
【23】MUHLBAUER W K. Pipeline risk management manual[M]. Houston:Gulf Publishing Company,2004.
相关信息