Cause on Mechanical Properties Difference of ER90S-G Welding Wire Joint
摘 要
ER90S-G低合金钢焊丝作为第三代压水堆核电机组AP1000钢制安全壳拼装焊材,对其质量需要严格控制。某批次ER90S-G焊丝在入厂验收过程中,检测发现焊接试样在室温条件下的抗拉强度为740 MPa,超过ASME Ⅱ SFA 5.28:2013要求的上限值(735 MPa),而在后续复验时测得抗拉强度分别为650 MPa和640 MPa。通过力学性能试验、化学成分分析、金相检验和焊接参数对比分析等方法,对造成力学性能前后测试结果存在差异的原因进行了分析。结果表明:焊接过程中层间温度偏低是造成性能差异的主要原因,其造成接头的晶粒尺寸变小,最终导致抗拉强度和屈服强度升高,断后伸长率降低。
Abstract
ER90S-G, a low alloy steel welding wire, is the welding material for the assembly of AP1000 steel containment of the third generation PWR nuclear power plant group, which requires high quality. During the acceptance process of a batch of ER90S-G welding wire, it was found that the tensile strength of the welding sample at room temperature was 740 MPa, which exceeded the upper limit of the requirement of ASME Ⅱ SFA 5.28:2013 (735 MPa). In the subsequent retesting process, the tensile strength values were 650 MPa and 640 MPa respectively. The causes of the difference of mechanical property test results were analyzed by means of mechanical property test, chemical composition analysis, metallographic examination and comparative analysis of welding parameters. The results show that the low temperature between layers during welding process was an important cause for performance difference, which made the grain size of the joint to be smaller, and finally led to the high tensile strength and yield strength, and the low elongation after fracture.
中图分类号 TG115 DOI 10.11973/lhjy-wl202007003
所属栏目 试验与研究
基金项目
收稿日期 2019/9/25
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
备注丁严广(1985-),男,工程师,主要从事焊接工艺和金属材料的理化检验工作,dygsdlc@163.com
引用该论文: DING Yanguang,LI Jian,SUN Shengye. Cause on Mechanical Properties Difference of ER90S-G Welding Wire Joint[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis part A:Physical Testing, 2020, 56(7): 9~12
丁严广,李健,孙盛业. ER90S-G焊丝接头力学性能出现差异的原因[J]. 理化检验-物理分册, 2020, 56(7): 9~12
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】邹玮.AP1000模块化施工分析[J].中国核电,2014,7(1):42-46.
【2】王兆希,方奇术,张小亮.AP1000核电站双层安全壳老化分析[J].工业建筑,2018,48(z):327-331.
【3】宁冬,包章根,姚伟达.AP1000先进核电厂钢安全壳容器的材料设计要求[C]//第14届全国反应堆结构力学会议论文集. 桂林:中国力学学会,中国核学会,2006:304-307.
【4】叶成,郑明光,王勇,等.AP1000钢制安全壳厚度对传热性能的影响[J].原子能科学技术,2014,48(3):457-461.
【5】丁连征,孟庆森,王锴.工艺参数对SA738Gr.B钢焊接接头组织及力学性能的影响[J].焊接,2014(11):45-47.
【6】杨克,杨可,包晔峰.Q345D钢埋弧焊接头组织与性能[J].电焊机,2014,44(1):87-90.
【7】张学杰,张兴元,姚润钢,等.焊接参数对自保护药芯焊丝熔敷金属组织及韧性的影响[J].焊接,2018(5):48-52.
【8】韩晓乾,张海龙,杜东婵,等.ER50-6碳钢实心焊丝表面缺陷分析[J].理化检验(物理分册),2018,54(10):782-784.
【9】耿延朝,邓德伟,田鑫,等.焊接电流对镍基铌复合堆焊层组织及性能的影晌[J].理化检验(物理分册),2019,55(4):240-243.
【2】王兆希,方奇术,张小亮.AP1000核电站双层安全壳老化分析[J].工业建筑,2018,48(z):327-331.
【3】宁冬,包章根,姚伟达.AP1000先进核电厂钢安全壳容器的材料设计要求[C]//第14届全国反应堆结构力学会议论文集. 桂林:中国力学学会,中国核学会,2006:304-307.
【4】叶成,郑明光,王勇,等.AP1000钢制安全壳厚度对传热性能的影响[J].原子能科学技术,2014,48(3):457-461.
【5】丁连征,孟庆森,王锴.工艺参数对SA738Gr.B钢焊接接头组织及力学性能的影响[J].焊接,2014(11):45-47.
【6】杨克,杨可,包晔峰.Q345D钢埋弧焊接头组织与性能[J].电焊机,2014,44(1):87-90.
【7】张学杰,张兴元,姚润钢,等.焊接参数对自保护药芯焊丝熔敷金属组织及韧性的影响[J].焊接,2018(5):48-52.
【8】韩晓乾,张海龙,杜东婵,等.ER50-6碳钢实心焊丝表面缺陷分析[J].理化检验(物理分册),2018,54(10):782-784.
【9】耿延朝,邓德伟,田鑫,等.焊接电流对镍基铌复合堆焊层组织及性能的影晌[J].理化检验(物理分册),2019,55(4):240-243.
相关信息