Uncertainty Evaluation of Vickers Hardness Measurement for Resistance Welding Joint of DP780 High Strength Steel
摘 要
采用430SVD型数显显微硬度计,通过直接评定法对DP780高强钢电阻焊接头的母材、热影响区及焊缝区分别进行了维氏硬度试验,分析了不同因素对测量结果产生的影响,并对维氏硬度测量结果进行了不确定度评定。结果表明:该DP780高强钢电阻焊接头母材、热影响区及焊缝区维氏硬度的测量不确定度分别为9,9,10 HV,均满足GB/T 4340.2—2012中表5要求的硬度计最大允许误差,该维氏硬度检测方法、检验水平能够满足国家标准的要求。与硬度计本身硬件设施误差相比,压痕对角线长度的测量对合成不确定度评定结果的影响更大。
Abstract
The Vickers hardness of base metal, heat affected zone and weld zone of resistance welding joint of DP780 high strength steel was tested by direct evaluation method with 430SVD digital microhardness tester. The influences of different factors on the measurement results were analyzed, and the uncertainty of Vickers hardness measurement results was evaluated. The results show that the uncertainty of Vickers hardness measurement of base metal, heat affected zone and weld zone of resistance welding joint of DP780 high strength steel is 9, 9, 10 HV respectively, which meets the maximum allowable error of hardness tester in table 5 of GB/T 4340.2—2012, and the Vickers hardness testing method and testing level can meet the requirements of national standard. Compared with the hardware facility error of hardness tester, the measurement of indentation diagonal length has a greater impact on the evaluation result of combined uncertainty.
中图分类号 TB938.2 DOI 10.11973/lhjy-wl20210705
所属栏目 试验与研究
基金项目
收稿日期 2020/8/11
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
备注张洁(1992-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事焊接技术与工程研究工作,787867534@qq.com
引用该论文: ZHANG Jie,ZHANG Xiangrui,HE Guoqiang,YIN Xiaohui. Uncertainty Evaluation of Vickers Hardness Measurement for Resistance Welding Joint of DP780 High Strength Steel[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis part A:Physical Testing, 2021, 57(7): 20~24
张洁,张祥瑞,何国强,尹孝辉. DP780高强钢电阻焊接头维氏硬度测量不确定度评定[J]. 理化检验-物理分册, 2021, 57(7): 20~24
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】YANG L J,GAO S L,HUANG Y M,et al.Effect of microstructure on tensile and fatigue properties of laser-welded DP780 and DP980 high-strength steel joints[J].Materials Science and Engineering:A,2019,754:535-555.
【2】LIU Y,DONG D Y,WANG L,et al.Strain rate dependent deformation and failure behavior of laser welded DP780 steel joint under dynamic tensile loading[J].Materials Science and Engineering:A,2015,627:296-305.
【3】张宪,穆丹宁.金属材料维氏硬度试验测量不确定度的评定[J].理化检验(物理分册),2017,53(6):410-412.
【4】王承忠.测量不确定度基本原理和评定方法及在材料检测中的评定实例——第一讲测量不确定度的基本原理和定义[J].理化检验(物理分册),2013,49(9):597-604.
【5】邱世洵.用能量法表征布氏、洛氏、维氏硬度值[J].理化检验(物理分册),2016,52(8):557-561.
【6】张宪,穆丹宁.金属材料维氏硬度试验测量不确定度的评定[J].理化检验(物理分册),2017,53(6):410-412.
【7】陈凌峰.标准不确定度A类评定中极差法的深入讨论[J].计量学报,2019,40(2):347-352.
【8】邹明松.测量不确定度评定与表示中常见概率分布包含因子k值的来源和分析[J].计量与测试技术,2014,41(6):84-86.
【9】中国合格评定国家认可中心,宝山钢铁股份有限公司研究院.材料理化检验测量不确定度评估指南及实例[M].北京:中国计量出版社,2007.
【2】LIU Y,DONG D Y,WANG L,et al.Strain rate dependent deformation and failure behavior of laser welded DP780 steel joint under dynamic tensile loading[J].Materials Science and Engineering:A,2015,627:296-305.
【3】张宪,穆丹宁.金属材料维氏硬度试验测量不确定度的评定[J].理化检验(物理分册),2017,53(6):410-412.
【4】王承忠.测量不确定度基本原理和评定方法及在材料检测中的评定实例——第一讲测量不确定度的基本原理和定义[J].理化检验(物理分册),2013,49(9):597-604.
【5】邱世洵.用能量法表征布氏、洛氏、维氏硬度值[J].理化检验(物理分册),2016,52(8):557-561.
【6】张宪,穆丹宁.金属材料维氏硬度试验测量不确定度的评定[J].理化检验(物理分册),2017,53(6):410-412.
【7】陈凌峰.标准不确定度A类评定中极差法的深入讨论[J].计量学报,2019,40(2):347-352.
【8】邹明松.测量不确定度评定与表示中常见概率分布包含因子k值的来源和分析[J].计量与测试技术,2014,41(6):84-86.
【9】中国合格评定国家认可中心,宝山钢铁股份有限公司研究院.材料理化检验测量不确定度评估指南及实例[M].北京:中国计量出版社,2007.
相关信息