Effect of Different Fitting Functions on Evaluation Results of Ductile Brittle Transition Temperature of Gas Turbine Disk
摘 要
为研究拟合函数对燃气轮机轮盘韧脆转变温度评定结果的影响,在不同温度下对燃气轮机轮盘进行夏比冲击试验,分别采用线性内插、玻尔兹曼函数、双曲正切函数的冲击吸收能量和脆性断面率进行拟合,计算得到相应的特定比例断口形貌转变温度FATT SEPC和特定冲击吸收能量转变温度ETT AV,并对计算结果进行了比较与分析。结果表明:对于钢铁材料,无论是断口形貌还是冲击吸收能量的转变温度,通过合理设定边界值,采用双曲正切函数和玻尔兹曼函数可获得近似一致的拟合结果。而双曲正切函数的物理意义更明确,且对一些非对称转变曲线的拟合更具优势,线性内插拟合只能粗略预估转变温度是否合格,当其接近要求值时,不能用于判定是否合格,还需采用玻尔兹曼函数或双曲正切函数进行精确拟合。
Abstract
In order to study the effect of different fitting functions on the evaluation results of ductile brittle transition temperature of gas turbine disk, the charpy impact tests of gas turbine disk were carried out at different temperatures, the linear interpolation, Boltzmann function and hyperbolic tangent function were used to fit the impact absorbed energy and brittle fracture ratio, the special proportion fracture morphology transition temperatures FATT SEPC and the special absorbed energy transition temperatures ETT AV were calculated, and the calculated results were compared and analyzed. The results show that for steel materials, both the transition temperature of fracture morphology and impact absorbed energy, the fitting results using hyperbolic tangent function and Boltzmann function by setting reasonable boundary value can be almost consistent. However, the physical meaning of hyperbolic tangent function is more clear, and it has more advantages in fitting some asymmetric transformation curves. Linear interpolation fitting can only roughly estimate whether the transformation temperature is qualified or not. When it is close to the required value, it can not be used to determine whether it is qualified or not. It also needs to use Boltzmann function or hyperbolic tangent function for accurate fitting.
中图分类号 TG115.5+6 DOI 10.11973/lhjy-wl202107007
所属栏目 试验与研究
基金项目
收稿日期 2020/6/1
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
备注杨金刚(1975-),男,高级工程师,主要从事金属材料及零部件力学性能分析工作,546578365@qq.com
引用该论文: YANG Jingang. Effect of Different Fitting Functions on Evaluation Results of Ductile Brittle Transition Temperature of Gas Turbine Disk[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis part A:Physical Testing, 2021, 57(7): 29~34
杨金刚. 拟合函数对燃气轮机轮盘韧脆转变温度评定结果的影响[J]. 理化检验-物理分册, 2021, 57(7): 29~34
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】刘学政, 普晓明,敬仕煜,等.夏比V型冲击试验的尺寸效应及工程应用[J].理化检验(物理分册),2020,56(5):1-5.
【2】张宏伟,张华锋,吴飞飞,等.核电工程用冲击试验标准对比分析[J].理化检验(物理分册),2020,56(3):22-25.
【3】许鹤君.金属材料韧脆转变温度检测中的一些关键问题[J].理化检验(物理分册),2017,53(6):422-427.
【4】吴波,高光艳,孙明烨,等.燃气高压场站典型管材的韧脆转变温度及其影响因素[J].理化检验(物理分册),2016,52(6):379-383.
【5】吴开斌,姚勇.不同标准20钢管韧脆转变温度的测定[J].理化检验(物理分册),2016,52(5):300-302.
【6】许鹤君,凌霄,巴发海.风力发电机主轴用34CrNiMo6钢的韧脆转变温度分析[J].理化检验(物理分册),2015,51(5):307-311.
【7】张锦,张瑞雪,马丽,等.影响B50A224钢韧脆转变温度的因素[J].理化检验(物理分册),2015,51(2):105-108.
【8】吴波,高光艳,孙明烨,等.高压燃气站螺旋焊管韧脆转变温度的测试[J].理化检验(物理分册),2015,51(2):116-119.
【9】金钰明,余雷,蔡宗涛.摆锤刀刃半径对夏比冲击试验结果的影响[J].理化检验(物理分册),2014,50(12):874-877.
【10】何亚元,李利巍,骆海贺,等.Boltzmann函数拟合法确定高强钢韧脆转变温度[J].物理测试,2020,38(1):7-9.
【2】张宏伟,张华锋,吴飞飞,等.核电工程用冲击试验标准对比分析[J].理化检验(物理分册),2020,56(3):22-25.
【3】许鹤君.金属材料韧脆转变温度检测中的一些关键问题[J].理化检验(物理分册),2017,53(6):422-427.
【4】吴波,高光艳,孙明烨,等.燃气高压场站典型管材的韧脆转变温度及其影响因素[J].理化检验(物理分册),2016,52(6):379-383.
【5】吴开斌,姚勇.不同标准20钢管韧脆转变温度的测定[J].理化检验(物理分册),2016,52(5):300-302.
【6】许鹤君,凌霄,巴发海.风力发电机主轴用34CrNiMo6钢的韧脆转变温度分析[J].理化检验(物理分册),2015,51(5):307-311.
【7】张锦,张瑞雪,马丽,等.影响B50A224钢韧脆转变温度的因素[J].理化检验(物理分册),2015,51(2):105-108.
【8】吴波,高光艳,孙明烨,等.高压燃气站螺旋焊管韧脆转变温度的测试[J].理化检验(物理分册),2015,51(2):116-119.
【9】金钰明,余雷,蔡宗涛.摆锤刀刃半径对夏比冲击试验结果的影响[J].理化检验(物理分册),2014,50(12):874-877.
【10】何亚元,李利巍,骆海贺,等.Boltzmann函数拟合法确定高强钢韧脆转变温度[J].物理测试,2020,38(1):7-9.
相关信息