Reasons of Fracture of Safety Valve Spring of Auxiliary Boiler in a Nuclear Power Station
摘 要
通过形貌观察、化学成分分析、硬度测试、显微组织和断口分析等方法,分析了核电站辅助锅炉安全阀弹簧断裂的原因,采用慢应变速率试验(SSRT)比较了去氢前后弹簧的力学性能。结果表明:弹簧的化学成分和显微组织均符合标准规定,仅氢含量略高(2.8 μg/g),弹簧在较高的剪切力作用下发生氢脆断裂是其失效的主要原因;SSRT后,与原始弹簧相比,去氢后弹簧的抗拉强度有所降低,断裂时间延长40%,断后伸长率由8%提高到15%,断面收缩率由21%提高到31%,弹簧的氢脆敏感性明显降低。
Abstract
The fracture reasons of safety valve spring of auxiliary boiler in a nuclear power station were analyzed by morphology observation, chemical composition analysis, hardness test, microstructure and fracture analysis, and the slow strain rate test (SSRT) was used to compare the mechanical performance of the spring before and after dehydrogenation. The results showed that chemical composition and microstructure of the spring all met standard regulation, only its hydrogen content was slightly high (2.8 μg/g). The fracture was hydrogen embrittlement fracture. The hydrogen embrittlement fracture of spring under high shear force was the main reason for its failure. Compared with the original spring, the tensile strength of the spring after dehydrogenation was reduced after SSRT test, the cracking time increased by 40%, and the elongation increased from 8% to 15%, the reduction of area increased from 21% to 31%. The hydrogen embrittlement sensitivity of spring was significantly reduced.
中图分类号 TG174 DOI 10.11973/fsyfh-202109022
所属栏目 失效分析
基金项目
收稿日期 2020/5/15
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
引用该论文: BAI Zhankun,YUAN Yü,LIU Huahe,ZHOU Lukun,JIANG Haochuan,FANG Qishu. Reasons of Fracture of Safety Valve Spring of Auxiliary Boiler in a Nuclear Power Station[J]. Corrosion & Protection, 2021, 42(9): 106
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】李洋,曹梦黎. 锅炉安全阀弹簧失效的分析[J]. 黑龙江科技信息,2012(1):18.
【2】邱文鹏,常序华,王仁智. 圆柱螺旋弹簧氢脆断裂失效分析[J]. 金属制品,2007,33(1):24-27.
【3】金双峰,程鹏,姜膺,等. 弹簧的失效分析与预防技术[J]. 金属热处理,2011,36(S1):140-144.
【4】程鹏,阮军元,邵晨曦. 基于Solidworks Simulation的圆柱螺旋弹簧应力分析[J]. 机电产品开发与创新,2014,27(2):58-59.
【5】张华波. 基于SOLIDWORKS的安全阀弹簧的应力分析[J]. 科技传播,2013,5(17):93-94.
【6】陈再良,付海峰,吕东显. 55CrSi弹簧钢的氢脆断裂分析[J]. 金属热处理,2011,36(S1):383-387.
【7】HERRING D H. Hydroqen embrittlement[J]. Wire Forming Technology International,2010,13(4):24-27.
【8】韩晶,徐巍. 弹簧断裂原因分析[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2006,42(5):258-260.
【9】SAINI N,PANDEY C,MAHAPATRA M M. Effect of diffusible hydrogen content on embrittlement of P92 steel[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2017,42(27):17328-17338.
【2】邱文鹏,常序华,王仁智. 圆柱螺旋弹簧氢脆断裂失效分析[J]. 金属制品,2007,33(1):24-27.
【3】金双峰,程鹏,姜膺,等. 弹簧的失效分析与预防技术[J]. 金属热处理,2011,36(S1):140-144.
【4】程鹏,阮军元,邵晨曦. 基于Solidworks Simulation的圆柱螺旋弹簧应力分析[J]. 机电产品开发与创新,2014,27(2):58-59.
【5】张华波. 基于SOLIDWORKS的安全阀弹簧的应力分析[J]. 科技传播,2013,5(17):93-94.
【6】陈再良,付海峰,吕东显. 55CrSi弹簧钢的氢脆断裂分析[J]. 金属热处理,2011,36(S1):383-387.
【7】HERRING D H. Hydroqen embrittlement[J]. Wire Forming Technology International,2010,13(4):24-27.
【8】韩晶,徐巍. 弹簧断裂原因分析[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2006,42(5):258-260.
【9】SAINI N,PANDEY C,MAHAPATRA M M. Effect of diffusible hydrogen content on embrittlement of P92 steel[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2017,42(27):17328-17338.
相关信息