Selection of Brinell hardness measuring scale for weld of Inconel 625 nickel-based alloy pipe joint with different welding processes
摘 要
通过布氏硬度试验,研究了测量标尺对不同焊接工艺Inconel 625镍基合金管接头焊缝压痕形貌和布氏硬度的影响。结果表明:在不同测量标尺条件下,堆焊镍基合金管接头焊缝的布氏硬度压痕边缘较为光滑平顺;在HBW 5/750和HBW 2. 5/187. 5测量标尺条件下,手把焊和氩弧焊镍基合金管接头焊缝的布氏硬度压痕形状趋向于圆形;在同一载荷与压头直径平方的比值条件下,采用不同测量标尺测得的布氏硬度基本相同;对于堆焊镍基合金管接头,建议采用HBW 10/300测量标尺;对于手把焊和氩弧焊镍基合金管接头,建议采用HBW 5/750测量标尺。
Abstract
Through the Brinell hardness test, the influence of measuring scale on the indentation morphology and Brinell hardness of the weld of Inconel 625 nickel-based alloy pipe joint with different welding processes was studied. The results showed that under different measuring scale conditions, the edge of Brinell hardness indentation in weld of nickel-based alloy pipe joint was relatively smooth. Under the conditions of HBW 5/750 and HBW 2. 5/187. 5 measuring scales, the shape of Brinell hardness indentation in weld of handle welding and argon arc welding nickel-based alloy pipe joints tended to be round. Under the condition of the same ratio of load to square of diameter of the indenter, the Brinell hardness measured by different measuring scales were basically same. For surfacing nickel-based alloy pipe joint, it was recommended to use HBW 10/300 measuring scale. For handle welding and argon arc welding nickel-based alloy pipe joint, it was recommended to use HBW 5/750 measuring scale.
中图分类号 TG115 DOI 10.11973/lhjy-wl202201002
所属栏目 试验与研究
基金项目
收稿日期 2021/1/20
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
备注代绪成(1985-),男,高级工程师,主要从事金属材料焊接工艺评定检测工作,daixucheng@126.com
引用该论文: DAI Xucheng,SHANG Yongjia,LIU Hong,WANG Bin,FAN Liyuan. Selection of Brinell hardness measuring scale for weld of Inconel 625 nickel-based alloy pipe joint with different welding processes[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis part A:Physical Testing, 2022, 58(1): 5~7
代绪成,尚用甲,刘宏,汪彬,范沥元. 不同焊接工艺Inconel 625镍基合金管接头焊缝布氏硬度测量标尺的选择[J]. 理化检验-物理分册, 2022, 58(1): 5~7
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】黄书泽,丁彪,邹凤平,等.试验载荷对维氏硬度测试误差的影响[J].理化检验(物理分册),2014,50(2):127-130.
【2】张庶鑫,李亮,吉楠,等.布氏硬度试验标准GB/T 231与ASTM E10的差异分析及其在石油装备行业中的应用[J].理化检验(物理分册),2015,51(10):717-720.
【3】王玉峰.布氏硬度的误差分析[J].天津冶金,2016(2):59-60,64.
【4】杨竹君,赵洪刚.布氏硬度测量方法改进研究[J].热加工工艺,2011,40(20):191-193.
【5】毕文婕,王坤朋,曹福民,等.布氏硬度试验误差来源分析及控制方法[J].中国设备工程,2020(9):140-142.
【6】白新房,张小明,陈绍楷.试验力选择对维氏硬度值的影响[J].理化检验(物理分册),2007,43(11):560-562.
【7】吴益文,王贝发,汪律.布氏硬度不同测量标尺间关系探究[J].物理测试,2008,26(5):24-26,29.
【8】高钰璧,丁雨田,孟斌,等.Inconel 625合金中析出相演变研究进展[J].材料工程,2020,48(5):13-22.
【9】秦建,王丽,黑鹏辉,等.Inconel 625堆焊接头组织与性能分析[J].机械制造文摘(焊接分册),2015(1):16-19.
【2】张庶鑫,李亮,吉楠,等.布氏硬度试验标准GB/T 231与ASTM E10的差异分析及其在石油装备行业中的应用[J].理化检验(物理分册),2015,51(10):717-720.
【3】王玉峰.布氏硬度的误差分析[J].天津冶金,2016(2):59-60,64.
【4】杨竹君,赵洪刚.布氏硬度测量方法改进研究[J].热加工工艺,2011,40(20):191-193.
【5】毕文婕,王坤朋,曹福民,等.布氏硬度试验误差来源分析及控制方法[J].中国设备工程,2020(9):140-142.
【6】白新房,张小明,陈绍楷.试验力选择对维氏硬度值的影响[J].理化检验(物理分册),2007,43(11):560-562.
【7】吴益文,王贝发,汪律.布氏硬度不同测量标尺间关系探究[J].物理测试,2008,26(5):24-26,29.
【8】高钰璧,丁雨田,孟斌,等.Inconel 625合金中析出相演变研究进展[J].材料工程,2020,48(5):13-22.
【9】秦建,王丽,黑鹏辉,等.Inconel 625堆焊接头组织与性能分析[J].机械制造文摘(焊接分册),2015(1):16-19.
相关信息