Determination of K, Ca, Na, Mg in Heat Not Burning Cigarette by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry with Hydrochloric Acid Ultrasonic Extraction
摘 要
加热不燃烧卷烟(HNB)烟丝样品经干燥、搅碎和过筛后,分取0.1 g置于锥形瓶中,加入0.05 mol·L-1盐酸溶液50 mL,超声提取20 min,离心。分取5 mL上清液,定容至50 mL,采用火焰原子吸收光谱法(FAAS)测定其中钙和钠含量;分取1 mL上清液,用水定容至100 mL,用FAAS测定其中钾和镁含量。结果显示,钾、钙、钠、镁的质量浓度均在一定范围内与其对应的吸光度呈线性关系,检出限(3s/k)分别为0.50,0.08,0.02,0.02 mg·kg-1;对实际样品进行6次平行测定和3个浓度水平的加标回收试验,测定值的相对标准偏差(n=6)均小于5.0%,回收率为90.0%~104%。方法用于5种分别用造纸法、稠浆法、辊压法和干法制备的HNB烟丝样品的分析,发现不同工艺所制样品中4种元素含量差别较大。
Abstract
After drying, crushing and sieving, 0.1 g of the heat not burning cigarette sample was placed in a conical flask, 0.05 mol·L-1 hydrochloric acid solution of 50 mL was added to extract for 20 min with ultrasonic. After centrifugation, 5 mL of supernatant was diluted to 50 mL with water for determination of Ca and Na by flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS), and 1 mL of supernatant was diluted to 100 mL with water for determination of K and Mg by FAAS. As found by results, linear relationships between absorbance and mass concentration of the 4 elements were kept in certain ranges, with detection limits (3s/k) of K, Ca, Na, Mg of 0.50, 0.08, 0.02, 0.02 mg·kg-1; 6 parallel determinations and 3 concentration levels of spike recovery tests were made on actual samples, RSDs (n=6) of the determined values were less than 5.0%, giving results of recovery in the range of 90.0%-104%. The proposed method was used for the analysis of 5 samples,which were prepared by paper-making method, slurry method, rolling method and air-laid method, and the contents of the 4 elements in the samples prepared by different methods were quite different.
中图分类号 O657.31 DOI 10.11973/lhjy-hx202202011
所属栏目 工作简报
基金项目
收稿日期 2020/10/21
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
备注段勤,工程师,主要从事烟草化学分析及安全性评价
引用该论文: DUAN Qin,WEN Guanghe,YANG Xueyan,YANG Yi,TIAN Feiyu,KEN Shengye. Determination of K, Ca, Na, Mg in Heat Not Burning Cigarette by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry with Hydrochloric Acid Ultrasonic Extraction[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis part B:Chemical Analysis, 2022, 58(2): 193~196
段勤,温光和,杨雪燕,杨屹,田飞宇,肯生叶. 盐酸超声提取-火焰原子吸收光谱法测定加热不燃烧卷烟烟丝中钾、钙、钠、镁的含量[J]. 理化检验-化学分册, 2022, 58(2): 193~196
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】REYNOLDS R J. Chemical and biological studies of new cigarette prototypes that heat instead of burn tobacco[M]. Winston-Salem:RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company, 1988.
【2】戴路,史春云,卢昕博,等.加热不燃烧制品与传统卷烟再造烟叶物理特性及化学成分差异分析[J].中国烟草学报, 2017,23(1):20-26.
【3】陈江华,刘建利,龙怀玉.中国烟叶矿质营养及主要化学成分含量特征研究[J].中国烟草学报, 2004,10(5):20-27.
【4】李国政,张峻松,邱建华,等.离子色谱法测定再造烟叶中的钠·氨·钾·镁·钙[J].安徽农业科学, 2014,42(2):575-576.
【5】王颖,张威,李雪,等.干法灰化-离子色谱法测定烟草中的钾、钙和镁[J].烟草科技, 2012,45(1):43-46.
【6】黄海涛,李忠,刘巍,等.烟草中钾的连续流动分析方法研究[J].光谱实验室, 2001,18(1):98-100.
【7】黄瑞,孙长胜,杨越,等.测定烟草中钾含量的连续流动分析方法[J].烟草科技, 1998(6):30-31.
【2】戴路,史春云,卢昕博,等.加热不燃烧制品与传统卷烟再造烟叶物理特性及化学成分差异分析[J].中国烟草学报, 2017,23(1):20-26.
【3】陈江华,刘建利,龙怀玉.中国烟叶矿质营养及主要化学成分含量特征研究[J].中国烟草学报, 2004,10(5):20-27.
【4】李国政,张峻松,邱建华,等.离子色谱法测定再造烟叶中的钠·氨·钾·镁·钙[J].安徽农业科学, 2014,42(2):575-576.
【5】王颖,张威,李雪,等.干法灰化-离子色谱法测定烟草中的钾、钙和镁[J].烟草科技, 2012,45(1):43-46.
【6】黄海涛,李忠,刘巍,等.烟草中钾的连续流动分析方法研究[J].光谱实验室, 2001,18(1):98-100.
【7】黄瑞,孙长胜,杨越,等.测定烟草中钾含量的连续流动分析方法[J].烟草科技, 1998(6):30-31.
相关信息