Influence of Metro OVPD on Stray Current Interference on Buried Pipelines
摘 要
以某地铁线路及其临近的埋地长输管道为测试研究对象,开展了4种不同轨电位限制装置(OVPD)运行工况下管道和轨道电参数的同步测试,分析了OVPD对埋地管道杂散电流干扰的影响规律,同时明确了轨地电位和轨地间流经电流的分布变化。结果表明:设备合位时,轨地间流经电流峰值大于1 000 A,两个站设备同时合位时,电流峰值增加约60%;供电区间内一端OVPD合位,另一端轨地电位略有降低;轨道与管道交叉点临近的OVPD合位时,影响范围内的管道电位正/负向偏移量均呈现增大的趋势,杂散电流流入/流出时间分布无明显变化,而远处OVPD合位时,管道杂散电流流出时间比例减小明显,约4 km外管道电位整体负向偏移,管道正向偏移和流出电流密度被抑制;轨道与管道交叉点临近的OVPD对于管道电位正向偏移影响程度大于远处OVPD,而对电位负向偏移的影响则刚好相反。
Abstract
Taking a metro line and adjacent buried long-distance pipeline as the testing object, the pipeline and track electrical parameters under 4 kinds of over-voltage protection device (OVPD) operating conditions was simultaneously tested. The influence rule of OVPD on the stray current interference on buried pipelines was analyzed, and the distribution rule of rail-to-ground potential and flowing current between rail and ground were clarified. The results show that when the equipment was switched on, the peak current flowing between rail and ground was greater than 1 000 A; the current peak value increased by about 60% when two OVPD were switched on at the same time. When one of OVPD at two ends of a power supply interval was switched on, the rail-to-ground potential at the other end slightly lowered. When the OVPD near the intersection of the rail and the pipeline was switched on, the positive/negative offset of the pipeline potential showed an increasing trend, and the time distribution of inflowing and outflowing stray current did not change significantly; while the remote OVPD was switched on, the proportion of stray current outflow was significantly reduced, and pipeline potential beyond 4 km overall negative shifted, positive offset of the pipeline potential and outflowing current density were suppressed. The OVPD near the intersection of rail and pipeline had a greater effect on the positive offset of the pipeline potential than the remote one, while the effect on the negative offset of the pipeline potential was just the opposite.
中图分类号 TE88 DOI 10.11973/fsyfh-202205007
所属栏目 应用技术
基金项目
收稿日期 2021/7/6
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
引用该论文: WU Guangchun,TAN Qiongliang,LI Minfeng,ZHANG Mengmeng,WANG Xiuyun,DU Yanxia. Influence of Metro OVPD on Stray Current Interference on Buried Pipelines[J]. Corrosion & Protection, 2022, 43(5): 38
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】朱祥剑,杜艳霞,覃慧敏,等.地铁杂散电流干扰下埋地管道管地电位动态波动规律[J].腐蚀与防护,2019,40(12):878-885.
【2】张文艳,傅江,王小平.地铁干扰对埋地管道的外腐蚀影响及风险评价方法研究[J].油气田地面工程,2019,38(10):110-117.
【3】张玉星,杜艳霞,路民旭.动态直流杂散电流干扰下埋地管道的腐蚀行为[J].腐蚀与防护,2013,34(9):771-774.
【4】计雪松,秦朝葵.杂散电流对埋地燃气管道的腐蚀及其监测[J].上海煤气,2007(4):12-15,46.
【5】高玉珍.轨交杂散电流对天然气主干网的腐蚀影响及防护探究[J].上海煤气,2016(2):6-11,31.
【6】覃慧敏,杜艳霞,路民旭,等.轨道交通对埋地管道动态直流干扰腐蚀的研究进展[J].腐蚀科学与防护技术,2018,30(6):653-660.
【7】ZAKOWSKI K,DAROWICKI K,ORLIKOWSKI J,et al. Electrolytic corrosion of water pipeline system in the remote distance from stray currents-Case study[J]. Case Studies in Construction Materials,2016,4:116-124.
【8】ZAKOWSKI K. The determination and identification of stray current source influences on buried pipelines using time/frequency analysis[J]. Anti-Corrosion Methods and Materials,2009,56(6):330-333.
【9】刘文权.城市地铁杂散电流对埋地输油管道的危害[J].全面腐蚀控制,2014,28(11):29-32.
【10】李怀志.地铁接触网短路状态下钢轨电位和限压保护装置研究[J].城市轨道交通研究,2020,23(5):19-22.
【11】冯祥,陈民武,胥伟,等.地铁钢轨电位限制装置电压保护异常动作分析及解决方案[J].电工技术,2018(21):110-114,117.
【12】李国欣,吴培林,裴文龙.钢轨电位与杂散电流综合抑制研究[J].城市轨道交通研究,2017,20(4):56-62.
【13】李德明.轨道交通OVPD对埋地管道杂散电流干扰影响[J].上海煤气,2021(1):9-14.
【14】高圣夫,刘炜,郑杰,等.直流牵引供电系统钢轨电位限值问题及其治理方案[J].城市轨道交通研究,2017,20(8):59-63.
【15】李健华.地铁杂散电流动态概率分布及其腐蚀防护的研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2016.
【16】张栋梁,刘颖熙,吴晗.不同牵引策略下地铁杂散电流动态分布研究[J].城市轨道交通研究,2017,20(9):37-42,50.
【2】张文艳,傅江,王小平.地铁干扰对埋地管道的外腐蚀影响及风险评价方法研究[J].油气田地面工程,2019,38(10):110-117.
【3】张玉星,杜艳霞,路民旭.动态直流杂散电流干扰下埋地管道的腐蚀行为[J].腐蚀与防护,2013,34(9):771-774.
【4】计雪松,秦朝葵.杂散电流对埋地燃气管道的腐蚀及其监测[J].上海煤气,2007(4):12-15,46.
【5】高玉珍.轨交杂散电流对天然气主干网的腐蚀影响及防护探究[J].上海煤气,2016(2):6-11,31.
【6】覃慧敏,杜艳霞,路民旭,等.轨道交通对埋地管道动态直流干扰腐蚀的研究进展[J].腐蚀科学与防护技术,2018,30(6):653-660.
【7】ZAKOWSKI K,DAROWICKI K,ORLIKOWSKI J,et al. Electrolytic corrosion of water pipeline system in the remote distance from stray currents-Case study[J]. Case Studies in Construction Materials,2016,4:116-124.
【8】ZAKOWSKI K. The determination and identification of stray current source influences on buried pipelines using time/frequency analysis[J]. Anti-Corrosion Methods and Materials,2009,56(6):330-333.
【9】刘文权.城市地铁杂散电流对埋地输油管道的危害[J].全面腐蚀控制,2014,28(11):29-32.
【10】李怀志.地铁接触网短路状态下钢轨电位和限压保护装置研究[J].城市轨道交通研究,2020,23(5):19-22.
【11】冯祥,陈民武,胥伟,等.地铁钢轨电位限制装置电压保护异常动作分析及解决方案[J].电工技术,2018(21):110-114,117.
【12】李国欣,吴培林,裴文龙.钢轨电位与杂散电流综合抑制研究[J].城市轨道交通研究,2017,20(4):56-62.
【13】李德明.轨道交通OVPD对埋地管道杂散电流干扰影响[J].上海煤气,2021(1):9-14.
【14】高圣夫,刘炜,郑杰,等.直流牵引供电系统钢轨电位限值问题及其治理方案[J].城市轨道交通研究,2017,20(8):59-63.
【15】李健华.地铁杂散电流动态概率分布及其腐蚀防护的研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2016.
【16】张栋梁,刘颖熙,吴晗.不同牵引策略下地铁杂散电流动态分布研究[J].城市轨道交通研究,2017,20(9):37-42,50.
相关信息