Comparison of two ultrasonic testing methods for austenitic welds
摘 要
结合工程应用数据,对全聚焦相控阵超声和双晶聚焦纵波斜探头超声两种技术的粗晶焊缝质量检测结果进行了对比分析,得到两种技术的信噪比数据、缺陷检出能力数据以及扫查覆盖能力的评价结果,指出了全聚焦相控阵检测技术具有覆盖范围大的特性,可减少扫查次数,提高检测速度,降低缺陷漏检的概率。
Abstract
Combined with the engineering application data, the results of coarse-grained weld quality inspection by full focus phased array ultrasound and double crystal focused longitudinal wave angle probe ultrasound are compared and analyzed. The signal-to-noise ratio data, defect detection ability data and scanning coverage ability of the two technologies are obtained. It is pointed out that the full focus phased array inspection technology is characteristic of large coverage, which can reduce the scanning times and improve the detection speed, and thus decreasing the rate of undetected defects.
中图分类号 TG115.28 DOI 10.11973/wsjc202207007
所属栏目 2021远东无损检测新技术论坛论文精选
基金项目
收稿日期 2021/12/15
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
备注张国强(1987-),男,工程师,主要从事无损检测技术工作
引用该论文: ZHANG Guoqiang,QIANG Tianpeng,GONG Chenggang,WANG Daocai,MENG Hui. Comparison of two ultrasonic testing methods for austenitic welds[J]. Nondestructive Testing, 2022, 44(7): 29~32
张国强,强天鹏,龚成刚,王道才,孟辉. 奥氏体焊缝的两种超声检测方法对比[J]. 无损检测, 2022, 44(7): 29~32
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】强天鹏,杨贵德,杜南开,等.全聚焦相控阵技术的场测量研究[J].无损检测,2020,42(2):1-6.
相关信息