Chemical Effects in Containment Sump under Reactor Accident
摘 要
核电站失水事故下,化学碎片可能引起安全壳地坑滤网堵塞,影响专设安全设施正常运行。模拟了不同材料遭遇喷淋冲刷进入安全壳地坑后的溶解、沉淀特性。结果表明:不同材料的溶解腐蚀有较大差异,同种材料在不同pH环境中也表现出腐蚀区别。Al、Si是产生化学沉淀的主要元素,启动安全壳喷淋系统和触发安全壳TSP (磷酸三钠)调节篮均能促进化学沉积生成,增加地坑滤网堵塞风险。降低Al、Si等元素释放是缓解滤网堵塞的重要措施。
Abstract
Under the loss of coolant accident (LOCA) in a nuclear power plants, chemical debris may cause blockage of the sump strainer in the containment pool, and affect the normal operation of safety facilities. The dissolution and precipitation characteristics of different materials after LOCA were simulated. The results show that the corrosion of different materials was quite different, and the same material also showed differences in different pH environments. Al and Si were the main elements that produced chemical precipitation. Starting the containment spray system and triggering the containment TSP (Trisodium phosphate) baskets would promote chemical deposition and increase the risk of the sump strainer blockage. Reducing the release of Al and Si was an important measure to relieve the sump blockage.
中图分类号 TG172 DOI 10.11973/fsyfh-202207008
所属栏目 试验研究
基金项目 国家科技重大专项(2017ZX06002003)
收稿日期 2020/9/12
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
引用该论文: CHENG Huaiyuan,CHEN Zhigang,BAO Yichen,SHI Xiuqiang,LIU Xiaoqiang,ZHANG Lefu. Chemical Effects in Containment Sump under Reactor Accident[J]. Corrosion & Protection, 2022, 43(7): 52
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】李春, 张庆华, 刘宇. 核电厂安全壳地坑滤网堵塞问题研究进展与现状[J]. 核安全, 2008, 7(4):37-41.
【2】刘宇, 张庆华, 李春. 核电厂安全壳地坑滤网堵塞问题的机理分析[J]. 核安全, 2008, 7(3):52-56.
【3】NRC. Regulatory guide 1.82. sumps for emergency core cooling and containment systems[R].[S.l.]:[s.n.], 1974.
【4】BAHN C B. Chemical effects on pwr sump strainer blockage after a loss-of-coolant accident:review on us research efforts[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 2013, 45(3):295-310.
【5】PARK J H, KASZA K, FISHER B, et al. Chemical effects head-loss research in support of generic safety issue 191[R].Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI),[S.l.]:[s.n.], 2006.
【6】RAO D V, LETELLIER B, SHAFFER C, et al. GSI-191 technical assessment:parametric evaluation for pressurized water reactor recirculation sump performance[R]. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission,[S.l.]:[s.n.], 2002.
【7】张卫, 龚钊, 朱京梅, 等. 秦山核电二期扩建工程安全壳地坑过滤器设计改进及遗留问题分析[J]. 核动力工程, 2013, 34(6):128-131.
【8】刘蔚伟, 夏小娇, 马韦刚, 等. 核电厂安全壳地坑过滤器化学效应试验研究[J]. 核动力工程, 2019, 40(5):124-129.
【9】唐明, 王涛, 夏小娇, 等. 压水堆安全壳地坑滤网化学效应WCAP分析方法[J]. 核动力工程, 2017, 38(S2):155-159.
【2】刘宇, 张庆华, 李春. 核电厂安全壳地坑滤网堵塞问题的机理分析[J]. 核安全, 2008, 7(3):52-56.
【3】NRC. Regulatory guide 1.82. sumps for emergency core cooling and containment systems[R].[S.l.]:[s.n.], 1974.
【4】BAHN C B. Chemical effects on pwr sump strainer blockage after a loss-of-coolant accident:review on us research efforts[J]. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 2013, 45(3):295-310.
【5】PARK J H, KASZA K, FISHER B, et al. Chemical effects head-loss research in support of generic safety issue 191[R].Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI),[S.l.]:[s.n.], 2006.
【6】RAO D V, LETELLIER B, SHAFFER C, et al. GSI-191 technical assessment:parametric evaluation for pressurized water reactor recirculation sump performance[R]. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission,[S.l.]:[s.n.], 2002.
【7】张卫, 龚钊, 朱京梅, 等. 秦山核电二期扩建工程安全壳地坑过滤器设计改进及遗留问题分析[J]. 核动力工程, 2013, 34(6):128-131.
【8】刘蔚伟, 夏小娇, 马韦刚, 等. 核电厂安全壳地坑过滤器化学效应试验研究[J]. 核动力工程, 2019, 40(5):124-129.
【9】唐明, 王涛, 夏小娇, 等. 压水堆安全壳地坑滤网化学效应WCAP分析方法[J]. 核动力工程, 2017, 38(S2):155-159.
相关信息