Burst Cause of 140V Steel Grade Production Casing Pipe During Wellbore Pressure Test
摘 要
140V钢级油层套管在进行全井筒试压时管体爆裂,采用宏观形貌分析、几何尺寸测量、力学试验、金相检测、扫描电镜及能谱分析等方法,分析了该套管管体爆裂原因。结果表明:该失效套管显微组织、几何尺寸、力学性能及抗内压强度等均符合标准要求,其管体爆裂模式为韧性断裂,爆裂的主要原因是管体内部压力超过了管体自身承压强度,导致发生过载断裂。
Abstract
The 140 V steel grade production casing pipe bursted during the wellbore pressure test. The causes of the casing pipe burst were analyzed by macromorphology analysis, geometry measurement, mechanical test, metallographic examination, scanning electron microscopy and energy spectrum analysis and so on. The results show that the microstructure, geometric size, mechanical properties and internal pressure strength of the failed casing met the requirements of the standard. The burst mode of the pipe was ductile fracture. The main reason for the burst was that the internal pressure of the pipe exceeded its own pressure bearing capacity, resulting in the overload fracture.
中图分类号 TE931.2 DOI 10.11973/jxgccl202211016
所属栏目 失效分析
基金项目
收稿日期 2021/8/16
修改稿日期 2022/9/20
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
备注赵金兰(1982-),女,山西平遥人,高级工程师,硕士
引用该论文: ZHAO Jinlan,TONG Ke,LI Hong,GUO Jun,LIU Jianxiong,LIU Qing. Burst Cause of 140V Steel Grade Production Casing Pipe During Wellbore Pressure Test[J]. Materials for mechancial engineering, 2022, 46(11): 97~101
赵金兰,仝珂,李虹,郭军,刘剑雄,刘青. 全井筒试压时140V钢级油层套管管体爆裂原因[J]. 机械工程材料, 2022, 46(11): 97~101
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】曾韦.高含硫气井井筒完整性安全评价[D].成都:西南石油大学,2014:1-5. ZENG W.Safety evaluation of wellbore integrity in high sulfur gas well[D].Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University,2014:1-5.
【2】慕立俊,张军,赵文轸,等.均匀腐蚀下油气井套管的强度及其寿命[J].石油化工腐蚀与防护,2010,27(6):10-13. MU L J,ZHANG J,ZHAO W Z,et al.Strength and service life of casing under uniform corrosion[J].Corrosion & Protection in Petrochemical Industry,2010,27(6):10-13.
【3】张智,周延军,付建红,等.含硫气井的井筒完整性设计方法[J].天然气工业,2010,30(3):67-69. ZHANG Z,ZHOU Y J,FU J H,et al.A method of well integrity design for sour gas wells[J].Natural Gas Industry,2010,30(3):67-69.
【4】崔绍华,谢培,崔智超,等.P110套管管体纵裂失效原因分析[J].石油管材与仪器,2019,5(3):33-37. CUI S H,XIE P,CUI Z C,et al.Failure analysis of longitudinal fracture on pipe body for P110 casing[J].Petroleum Tubular Goods & Instruments,2019,5(3):33-37.
【5】邱世欣,赵健明.高强度Q125套管水压试验爆裂失效分析[J].冶金与材料,2019,39(3):34-34. QIU S X,ZHAO J M.Failure analysis on hydraulic test burst of high strength Q125 casing [J].Metallurgy and Materials,2019,39(3):34-34.
【6】张鑫,李军,张慧,等.威荣区块深层页岩气井套管变形失效分析[J].钻采工艺,2021,44(1):23-27. ZHANG X,LI J,ZHANG H,et al.Analysis on casing deformation failure in deep shale gas wells in Weirong shale gas play[J].Drilling & Production Technology,2021,44(1):23-27.
【2】慕立俊,张军,赵文轸,等.均匀腐蚀下油气井套管的强度及其寿命[J].石油化工腐蚀与防护,2010,27(6):10-13. MU L J,ZHANG J,ZHAO W Z,et al.Strength and service life of casing under uniform corrosion[J].Corrosion & Protection in Petrochemical Industry,2010,27(6):10-13.
【3】张智,周延军,付建红,等.含硫气井的井筒完整性设计方法[J].天然气工业,2010,30(3):67-69. ZHANG Z,ZHOU Y J,FU J H,et al.A method of well integrity design for sour gas wells[J].Natural Gas Industry,2010,30(3):67-69.
【4】崔绍华,谢培,崔智超,等.P110套管管体纵裂失效原因分析[J].石油管材与仪器,2019,5(3):33-37. CUI S H,XIE P,CUI Z C,et al.Failure analysis of longitudinal fracture on pipe body for P110 casing[J].Petroleum Tubular Goods & Instruments,2019,5(3):33-37.
【5】邱世欣,赵健明.高强度Q125套管水压试验爆裂失效分析[J].冶金与材料,2019,39(3):34-34. QIU S X,ZHAO J M.Failure analysis on hydraulic test burst of high strength Q125 casing [J].Metallurgy and Materials,2019,39(3):34-34.
【6】张鑫,李军,张慧,等.威荣区块深层页岩气井套管变形失效分析[J].钻采工艺,2021,44(1):23-27. ZHANG X,LI J,ZHANG H,et al.Analysis on casing deformation failure in deep shale gas wells in Weirong shale gas play[J].Drilling & Production Technology,2021,44(1):23-27.
相关信息