Stray Current Interference of Metro Depot on Buried Steel Pipelines and Test Method for Rail-to-Ground Transition Resistance
摘 要
以国内某地铁车辆及其临近的埋地长输管道为测试研究对象,开展了出入段单向导通装置和库内轨电位限制装置不同运行工况下,地铁与管道相关电参数的现场同步测试,通过对比分析明确了其对埋地管道的杂散电流干扰影响特征;同时选取了某在役地上轨道段,利用埋地管道防腐蚀层绝缘电阻的测试方法对目标轨道的对地过渡电阻进行了试验测试。结果表明:出入段单导双向截断后,可将正线、库外和库内轨道的轨电位正向平均值降低至5 V以下;车辆段内的杂散电流水平受单导特性和库内轨道接地方式影响,单纯将出入段单导双向截断并不能完全解决车辆段的杂散电流问题;本案例中车辆段内单导和库内接地对埋地管道的杂散电流干扰影响范围小于2.6 km;利用埋地管道防腐层绝缘电阻的测试方法测试在役轨道对地过渡电阻是可行的。
Abstract
Taking a domestic subway vehicle and its adjacent buried long-distance pipeline as the test research object, on-site synchronous testing of the electrical parameters related to the subway and pipeline was carried out under different operating conditions of the one-way conduction device in the entrance and exit section and the rail potential limiting device in the depot. Through comparative analysis, the characteristics of the stray current interference on the buried pipeline were clarified. At the same time, a certain in-service track section was selected and the ground transition resistance of the target track was tested using the testing method of insulation resistance of buried pipeline anti-corrosion layer. The results showed that after the bidirectional cutoff of the single conductor in the entrance and exit section, the average forward rail potential of the main line, the tracks outside the depot, and the tracks inside the depot could be reduced to less than 5 V. The level of stray current in the depot was influenced by the single conductor characteristics and the grounding method of the track in the depot. Simply cutting off the single conductor in both directions at the entrance and exit sections could not completely solve the problem of stray current in the depot. In this case, the interference range of stray current on buried pipelines caused by single conductor and grounding in the depot was less than 2.6 km. It was feasible to use the testing method of insulation resistance of buried pipeline anti-corrosion coating to test the transition resistance of in-service track to ground.
中图分类号 TE88 DOI 10.11973/fsyfh-202307020
所属栏目 应用技术
基金项目
收稿日期 2021/9/22
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
引用该论文: WU Guangchun,WANG Can,LI Min,JIANG Nailiang,MA Xueli,YANG Lijun. Stray Current Interference of Metro Depot on Buried Steel Pipelines and Test Method for Rail-to-Ground Transition Resistance[J]. Corrosion & Protection, 2023, 44(7): 110
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】王宝顺. 地铁车辆段/停车场的杂散电流打火问题分析及回流系统优化[J]. 城市轨道交通研究,2020,218(11):168-171.
【2】郭志. 上海轨道交通3号线停车场杂散电流分析[J]. 城市轨道交通研究,2014,17(1):60-64.
【3】于志永. 地铁车辆段杂散电流的特征分析及防护[J]. 城市轨道交通研究,2017,181(10):54-57.
【4】俞益. 地铁车辆段杂散电流问题分析与治理方案[J]. 中国科技信息, 2019(1):90-92.
【5】蔡彬彬,刘佰川. 地铁车辆段杂散电流泄漏分析及处理[J]. 江苏科技信息,2019,606(21):47-50.
【6】黄山山,贺睿,陈智敏. 地铁车辆段杂散电流的探讨与分析[J]. 电气化铁道,2019(4):46-48.
【2】郭志. 上海轨道交通3号线停车场杂散电流分析[J]. 城市轨道交通研究,2014,17(1):60-64.
【3】于志永. 地铁车辆段杂散电流的特征分析及防护[J]. 城市轨道交通研究,2017,181(10):54-57.
【4】俞益. 地铁车辆段杂散电流问题分析与治理方案[J]. 中国科技信息, 2019(1):90-92.
【5】蔡彬彬,刘佰川. 地铁车辆段杂散电流泄漏分析及处理[J]. 江苏科技信息,2019,606(21):47-50.
【6】黄山山,贺睿,陈智敏. 地铁车辆段杂散电流的探讨与分析[J]. 电气化铁道,2019(4):46-48.
相关信息