Stray Current Interference from Metro Drainage Cabinet Operation to Nearby Buried Steel Structures
摘 要
以国内某地铁线路及其临近的埋地长输管道为测试研究对象,在排流柜不同运行工况下对地铁结构与管道相关电参数开展了现场同步测试,分析了排流柜运行工况对临近钢质构筑物(道床收集网、隧道壁结构钢筋和埋地长输管道)杂散电流干扰的影响规律。结果表明:排流柜的投用,特别是接地网支路投用时,流经排流柜的电流极值高达839.48 A;排流柜对供电区间两端的轨地电位的抑制效果与流经排流柜的电流呈现反比例关系且负向抑制效果大于正向;排流柜对临近钢质埋置构筑物的干扰影响主要体现为极化电位正向偏移量增大,且增大的幅度与流经排流柜的电流大小成正比;排流柜和OVPD特别是结构物临近的OVPD同时投用,极化电位正向偏移和负向偏移同时显著增大;排流柜杂散电流干扰对隧道壁结构钢筋的影响范围小于2 km,对3 km内管道影响较大,6 km外管道影响较小。
Abstract
Taking a domestic subway line and its adjacent buried long-haul pipeline as the test objects, the electrical parameters related to the subway structure and pipeline were tested simultaneously under different operating conditions of drainage cabinet, and the influence rule of operating conditions of drainage cabinet on the stray current interference to adjacent steel structures (ballast-bed collection network, tunnel wall structural reinforcement and buried pipeline) was analyzed. The results showed that the extreme value of the current through the drain cabinet was as high as 839.48 A,when the drainage cabinet was in use, especially the grounding grid branch. The suppression effect of drainage cabinets on the rail-to-ground potentials at both ends of power supply interval was inversely proportional to the current flowing through the drainage cabinet, and the negative suppression effect was greater than the positive one. The interference effect of the drainage cabinet on adjacent buried steel structures was mainly reflected in the increase of positive polarization potential deviation, and the increase amplitude was proportional to the current through the drainage cabinet. When the drainage cabinet and OVPD, especially OVPD adjacent to the structure worked together, the positive polarization potential deviation and the negative polarization potential deviation were obviously increased at the same time. The influence range of stray current interference was less than 2 km to tunnel structure reinforcement, and it was greater within 3 km and less outside 6 km to the pipeline.
中图分类号 TE88 DOI 10.11973/fsyfh-202308014
所属栏目 应用技术
基金项目
收稿日期 2021/8/9
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
引用该论文: WU Guangchun,DING Shuchun,ZHAO Chen,LI Jinwen,YANG Qingyun,WANG Xiuyun,ZHANG Mengmeng. Stray Current Interference from Metro Drainage Cabinet Operation to Nearby Buried Steel Structures[J]. Corrosion & Protection, 2023, 44(8): 75
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】朱祥剑, 杜艳霞, 覃慧敏, 等. 地铁杂散电流干扰下埋地管道管地电位动态波动规律[J]. 腐蚀与防护, 2019, 40(12):878-885.
【2】张文艳, 傅江, 王小平. 地铁干扰对埋地管道的外腐蚀影响及风险评价方法研究[J]. 油气田地面工程, 2019, 38(10):110-117.
【3】张玉星, 杜艳霞, 路民旭. 动态直流杂散电流干扰下埋地管道的腐蚀行为[J]. 腐蚀与防护, 2013, 34(9):771-774.
【4】计雪松, 秦朝葵. 杂散电流对埋地燃气管道的腐蚀及其监测[J]. 上海煤气, 2007(4):12-15, 46.
【5】高玉珍. 轨交杂散电流对天然气主干网的腐蚀影响及防护探究[J]. 上海煤气, 2016(2):6-11, 31.
【6】覃慧敏, 杜艳霞, 路民旭, 等. 轨道交通对埋地管道动态直流干扰腐蚀的研究进展[J]. 腐蚀科学与防护技术, 2018, 30(6):653-660.
【7】ZAKOWSKI K, DAROWICKI K, ORLIKOWSKI J, et al. Electrolytic corrosion of water pipeline system in the remote distance from stray currents-case study[J]. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2016, 4:116-124.
【8】ZAKOWSKI K. The determination and identification of stray current source influences on buried pipelines using time/frequency analysis[J]. Anti-Corrosion Methods and Materials, 2009, 56(6):330-333.
【9】刘文权. 城市地铁杂散电流对埋地输油管道的危害[J]. 全面腐蚀控制, 2014, 28(11):29-32.
【10】地铁杂散电流腐蚀防护技术标准:CJJ/T 49-2020[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2020.
【11】李立勃. 北京地铁大兴线钢轨电位限制装置瞬动原因分析与优化设计[J]. 现代城市轨道交通, 2018(3):10-14.
【12】高圣夫, 刘炜, 郑杰, 等. 直流牵引供电系统钢轨电位限值问题及其治理方案[J]. 城市轨道交通研究, 2017, 20(8):59-63.
【2】张文艳, 傅江, 王小平. 地铁干扰对埋地管道的外腐蚀影响及风险评价方法研究[J]. 油气田地面工程, 2019, 38(10):110-117.
【3】张玉星, 杜艳霞, 路民旭. 动态直流杂散电流干扰下埋地管道的腐蚀行为[J]. 腐蚀与防护, 2013, 34(9):771-774.
【4】计雪松, 秦朝葵. 杂散电流对埋地燃气管道的腐蚀及其监测[J]. 上海煤气, 2007(4):12-15, 46.
【5】高玉珍. 轨交杂散电流对天然气主干网的腐蚀影响及防护探究[J]. 上海煤气, 2016(2):6-11, 31.
【6】覃慧敏, 杜艳霞, 路民旭, 等. 轨道交通对埋地管道动态直流干扰腐蚀的研究进展[J]. 腐蚀科学与防护技术, 2018, 30(6):653-660.
【7】ZAKOWSKI K, DAROWICKI K, ORLIKOWSKI J, et al. Electrolytic corrosion of water pipeline system in the remote distance from stray currents-case study[J]. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2016, 4:116-124.
【8】ZAKOWSKI K. The determination and identification of stray current source influences on buried pipelines using time/frequency analysis[J]. Anti-Corrosion Methods and Materials, 2009, 56(6):330-333.
【9】刘文权. 城市地铁杂散电流对埋地输油管道的危害[J]. 全面腐蚀控制, 2014, 28(11):29-32.
【10】地铁杂散电流腐蚀防护技术标准:CJJ/T 49-2020[S]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2020.
【11】李立勃. 北京地铁大兴线钢轨电位限制装置瞬动原因分析与优化设计[J]. 现代城市轨道交通, 2018(3):10-14.
【12】高圣夫, 刘炜, 郑杰, 等. 直流牵引供电系统钢轨电位限值问题及其治理方案[J]. 城市轨道交通研究, 2017, 20(8):59-63.
相关信息