Direct Evaluation Method of Inner Corrosion of Sulfur-Containing Wet Gas Pipeline
摘 要
湿气管道内腐蚀直接评价方法(WG-ICDA)可对管道风险段进行等级划分,实现对管道全线的分级治理,显著降低了检测成本,提升了管道的安全性能。但由于介质环境的差异性,内腐蚀直接评价方法对某些管道的适应性相对较差,难以准确划分高风险段。采用数值模拟研究了含硫湿天然气对管道内腐蚀的影响。结果表明:天然气管道内腐蚀受积液的影响较大,管内积液为H2S/CO2腐蚀创造了条件,是发生局部腐蚀的重要影响因素。较多的管内积液会形成连续的积液区,积液底部腐蚀较轻微,气液界面处腐蚀较严重;若管内积液较少,由于压力和温度的变化,积液分散无序,内腐蚀反而严重。基于此,对湿气管道内腐蚀直接评价方法中的间接评价过程进行优化,并应用于塔河油田某湿气管道。评价结果表明:提出的湿气管道内腐蚀直接评价方法能更准确地判别含硫湿气管道的腐蚀风险,有效保障现场湿气管道安全运行管理。
Abstract
The direct evaluation method for corrosion in wet gas pipelines (WG-ICDA) can be used to classify the risk sections of pipelines, realize the hierarchical treatment of the entire pipeline, greatly reduce the cost of inspection, and improve the safety performance of the pipeline. However, due to the difference of the medium environment, the direct evaluation method of internal corrosion has relatively poor adaptability to certain pipelines, and it is difficult to accurately divide the high-risk sections. Therefore, numerical simulation was used to study the influence of sulfur-containing wet natural gas on pipeline corrosion. The results show that the corrosion in the natural gas pipeline was greatly affected by the accumulation of liquid. The accumulation of liquid in the pipeline created conditions for H2S/CO2 corrosion and was an important factor in the occurrence of local corrosion. High effusion in the tube, could form a continuous effusion zone, the bottom of the effusion corroded content of slight, and the corrosion at the gas-liquid interface was more serious. The less effusion in the tube, due to changes in pressure and temperature, the effusion was scattered and disorderly, and internal corrosion was instead severe. Based on this, the indirect evaluation process in the direct evaluation method of wet gas pipeline internal corrosion was optimized and applied to a wet gas pipeline in Tahe Oilfield. The evaluation results showed that the proposed direct evaluation method for internal corrosion of wet gas pipelines could identify the corrosion risk of sulfur-containing wet gas pipelines more accurately, and effectively guarantee the safe operation and management of on-site wet gas pipelines.
中图分类号 TG174.4 DOI 10.11973/fsyfh-202310018
所属栏目 应用技术
基金项目
收稿日期 2022/12/15
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
引用该论文: ZHAO Peng,GE Pengli,JIA Xudong,MA Zhihua. Direct Evaluation Method of Inner Corrosion of Sulfur-Containing Wet Gas Pipeline[J]. Corrosion & Protection, 2023, 44(10): 98
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】肖杰.气田湿气管道内腐蚀直接评价技术[J].石油与天然气化工,2019,48(2):110.
【2】韩也,田春晓,马金榕,等.含CO2/H2S湿气管道内腐蚀评价方法研究[J].油气田地面工程,2021,40(12):21-25.
【3】赵宗和.微H2S/CO2环境埋地集气管道腐蚀机理与防控[J].油气田地面工程,2021,40(9):73-76.
【4】DUFFY T S,HALL D M,ZIOMEK-MOROZ M,et al.TECHNICAL NOTE:monitoring X65 steel internal corrosion in humidified N2-containing H2S using membrane-based electrochemical sensors[J].Corrosion,2021,77(6):593-599.
【5】樊学华,于勇,陈丽娟,等.高温高Cl-含量环境中H2S/CO2分压对超级双相不锈钢UNS S32750点蚀行为的影响[J].腐蚀与防护,2021,42(2):32-36.
【6】谢飞,李佳航,王国付,等.天然气管道内腐蚀直接评价方法的改进[J].油气储运,2022,41(2):219-226.
【7】朱方辉,周志平,吴学虎,等.长庆气田集输管道内腐蚀直接评价技术优化[J].油气储运,2021,40(8):925-931.
【8】汪江斌,闫婷婷,杨萍,等.某海底多相流管线内腐蚀直接评价方法[J].腐蚀与防护,2020,41(10):.
【9】王凯,曹学文,温家铭,等.MP-ICDA在管道完整性管理中的应用[J].油气储运,2019,38(10):1113-1118.
【10】葛扬志,韩国进,边江,等.基于WG-ICDA的管道CO2腐蚀预测模型改进[J].石油地质与工程,2018,32(3):114-117.
【11】谢飞,李佳航,王新强,等.天然气管道CO2腐蚀机理及预测模型研究进展[J].天然气工业,2021,41(10):109-118.
【12】郑度奎,李昊燃,程远鹏,等.油气管道的CO2腐蚀预测模型和预测方法[J].腐蚀与防护,2020,41(3):48-53,58.
【13】邓心茹. 长庆油田集输管道内腐蚀直接评价技术(MP-ICDA)研究[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京),2018.
【14】王维斌,雷铮强,杨辉.长输管道数字射线DR检测技术应用与展望[J].油气储运,2020,39(12):1337-1343.
【15】王晓博,高振,侯建国,等.LNG接收站承压设备基于风险的在线检验方法[J].腐蚀与防护,2021,42(11):92-99.
【16】PENG Z, MINGHUI W E I, ZHIYONG G U O, et al. Advances in magnetic flux leakage testing technology[J]. Journal of Measurement Science & Instrumentation, 2021,12(1):1-11.
【17】汪晨武.免除漆管道超声波检测技术研究[D].东营:中国石油大学(华东),2018.
【18】马思同,郑阳,孙明,等.电磁超声C扫描在管道内检测缺陷复检中的应用研究[J].压力容器,2020,37(10):57-63.
【19】胡雄伟,冯新,周晶.纵向导波与管道中双缺陷相互作用的数值模拟[J].油气储运,2021,40(3):306-312.
【2】韩也,田春晓,马金榕,等.含CO2/H2S湿气管道内腐蚀评价方法研究[J].油气田地面工程,2021,40(12):21-25.
【3】赵宗和.微H2S/CO2环境埋地集气管道腐蚀机理与防控[J].油气田地面工程,2021,40(9):73-76.
【4】DUFFY T S,HALL D M,ZIOMEK-MOROZ M,et al.TECHNICAL NOTE:monitoring X65 steel internal corrosion in humidified N2-containing H2S using membrane-based electrochemical sensors[J].Corrosion,2021,77(6):593-599.
【5】樊学华,于勇,陈丽娟,等.高温高Cl-含量环境中H2S/CO2分压对超级双相不锈钢UNS S32750点蚀行为的影响[J].腐蚀与防护,2021,42(2):32-36.
【6】谢飞,李佳航,王国付,等.天然气管道内腐蚀直接评价方法的改进[J].油气储运,2022,41(2):219-226.
【7】朱方辉,周志平,吴学虎,等.长庆气田集输管道内腐蚀直接评价技术优化[J].油气储运,2021,40(8):925-931.
【8】汪江斌,闫婷婷,杨萍,等.某海底多相流管线内腐蚀直接评价方法[J].腐蚀与防护,2020,41(10):.
【9】王凯,曹学文,温家铭,等.MP-ICDA在管道完整性管理中的应用[J].油气储运,2019,38(10):1113-1118.
【10】葛扬志,韩国进,边江,等.基于WG-ICDA的管道CO2腐蚀预测模型改进[J].石油地质与工程,2018,32(3):114-117.
【11】谢飞,李佳航,王新强,等.天然气管道CO2腐蚀机理及预测模型研究进展[J].天然气工业,2021,41(10):109-118.
【12】郑度奎,李昊燃,程远鹏,等.油气管道的CO2腐蚀预测模型和预测方法[J].腐蚀与防护,2020,41(3):48-53,58.
【13】邓心茹. 长庆油田集输管道内腐蚀直接评价技术(MP-ICDA)研究[D].北京:中国石油大学(北京),2018.
【14】王维斌,雷铮强,杨辉.长输管道数字射线DR检测技术应用与展望[J].油气储运,2020,39(12):1337-1343.
【15】王晓博,高振,侯建国,等.LNG接收站承压设备基于风险的在线检验方法[J].腐蚀与防护,2021,42(11):92-99.
【16】PENG Z, MINGHUI W E I, ZHIYONG G U O, et al. Advances in magnetic flux leakage testing technology[J]. Journal of Measurement Science & Instrumentation, 2021,12(1):1-11.
【17】汪晨武.免除漆管道超声波检测技术研究[D].东营:中国石油大学(华东),2018.
【18】马思同,郑阳,孙明,等.电磁超声C扫描在管道内检测缺陷复检中的应用研究[J].压力容器,2020,37(10):57-63.
【19】胡雄伟,冯新,周晶.纵向导波与管道中双缺陷相互作用的数值模拟[J].油气储运,2021,40(3):306-312.
相关信息