成本收益分析方法在AP1000系统中的应用
Introduction of Cost-benefit Analysis and its Application in AP1000
摘 要
介绍了一种适用于核电站的成本收益分析方法，包括需要考虑的因素以及每项因素的计算方法，并将成本收益分析方法应用于AP1000系统，评估AP1000系统实施改造可获得的最大收益。由于AP1000系统的安全性较高，具有较低的堆芯损伤概率和大量放射性物质释放频率，根据该方法计算的最大可获收益相对实施电厂改造而言非常小。因此，单从成本收益分析角度而言，AP1000核电厂实施进一步的安全改进是不必要的。
AP1000
贴现率
安全改进
Cost-benefit analysis
AP1000
Discount rate
Safety Improvement
Abstract
The cost-benefit analysis method for nuclear power plant is introduced, including the considering factors and their calculations, then the method is implemented to the AP1000 to investigate the benefit could be achieved. Due to the high safety performance of AP1000 with very low Core Damage Frequency (CDF) and Large Release Frequency (LRF), the maximum achievable benefit is much lower than the cost of corresponding plant modification. Therefore, from only the cost-benefit point of view, it is unnecessary for implementing further safety improvement of AP1000 nuclear power plant.
中图分类号 X591
所属栏目 研究与探索
基金项目
收稿日期 2014/6/26
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
备注刘 鑫（1981-），男，工程师，硕士研究生，从事反应堆总体设计及安全分析工作。
引用该论文: Liu Xin. Introduction of Cost-benefit Analysis and its Application in AP1000[J]. Power & Energy, 2014, 35(4): 424～428
刘 鑫. 成本收益分析方法在AP1000系统中的应用[J]. 电力与能源, 2014, 35(4): 424～428
共有人对该论文发表了看法，其中：
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】U.S. NRC, Regulatory Analysis Technical Evaluation Handbook,NUERG/BR-0184,1997.
【2】G. L. Miller,R.M. Wachowiak，ESBWR Severe Accident Mitigation Design Alternatives［R］. NEDO-33306,Revision 1,August 2007.
【3】Appendix A, BFN SEVERE ACCIDENT MITIGATION ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS,2002.
【4】Mubayi,V.,et al. Cost-Benefit Considerations in Regulatory Analysis. NUREG/CR-6349, Brookhaven National Laboratory,Upton,New York.1995.
【5】Nuclear Energy Institute,Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives (SAMA) Analysis Guidance Document［R］,NEI 05-01,November 2005.
【6】孙汉虹，等.第三代核电技术AP1000［M］.北京：中国电力出版社，2010.
【7】US NRC, Reassessmentof NRC's Dollar Per Person-Rem Conversion Factor Policy,NUREG-1530,1995.
【2】G. L. Miller,R.M. Wachowiak，ESBWR Severe Accident Mitigation Design Alternatives［R］. NEDO-33306,Revision 1,August 2007.
【3】Appendix A, BFN SEVERE ACCIDENT MITIGATION ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS,2002.
【4】Mubayi,V.,et al. Cost-Benefit Considerations in Regulatory Analysis. NUREG/CR-6349, Brookhaven National Laboratory,Upton,New York.1995.
【5】Nuclear Energy Institute,Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives (SAMA) Analysis Guidance Document［R］,NEI 05-01,November 2005.
【6】孙汉虹，等.第三代核电技术AP1000［M］.北京：中国电力出版社，2010.
【7】US NRC, Reassessmentof NRC's Dollar Per Person-Rem Conversion Factor Policy,NUREG-1530,1995.
相关信息
