PM2.5重量法现场测量技术研究
Field Measurement Technology Research of PM2.5 Weight Method
摘 要
阐述了重量法（DPI）测量原理，分析了适用于现场测试的采样方法和操作流程，并首次利用DPI对燃煤电厂排放PM2.5进行现场测试研究，将测试结果同电荷法（ELPI）测试结果进行比较，研究发现两仪器的测试结果具有较好的一致性。DPI测试方法可为标准测试方法的选取提供参考。
重量法
测试方法
PM2.5
DPI
Measuring method
Abstract
In this paper, the DPI (gravimetric method) measuring principle was expounded, the field test sampling method and operation process was analyzed, and testing research for PM2.5 emissions from coal-fired power plant by use of DPI was carried on for the first time, compared with the test results which was got by charge method (ELPI) and the comparison showed that results received by the two testing instruments were preferable consistent. DPI test method can provide a reference for the selection of standard test methods.
中图分类号 X513
所属栏目 研究与探索
基金项目 国家高技术研究发展计划（863计划）“燃煤电站PM2.5捕集增效优化技术与装备研制”（2013AA065002）
收稿日期 2014/9/10
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
备注刘含笑（1987-），男，工程师，硕士研究生，从事燃煤电站PM2.5捕集增效优化技术与装备研发工作。
引用该论文: Liu Hanxiao,Zhu Shaoping,Yao Yuping,Li Jianguo,Chen Li,Fang Xiaowei. Field Measurement Technology Research of PM2.5 Weight Method[J]. Power & Energy, 2014, 35(5): 572～575
刘含笑,朱少平,姚宇平,郦建国,陈黎,方小伟. PM2.5重量法现场测量技术研究[J]. 电力与能源, 2014, 35(5): 572～575
共有人对该论文发表了看法，其中：
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】宁爱民,文军浩,郑德智,等.PM2.5监测技术及其比对测试研究进展[J].计测技术,2013,33(4):11-14.
【2】刘含笑,姚宇平,郦建国,等.PM2.5团聚测量技术及其研究进展[J].电力与能源,2013(4)：118-123.
【3】莫华,朱法华,王圣.火电行业大气污染物排放对PM2.5的贡献及减排对策[J].中国电力,2013,46(8).
【4】ISO 23210:2009 Stationary source emissions-Determination of PM10/PM2,5 mass concentration in flue gas-Measurement at low concentrations by use of impactors[S].2009.
【5】ISO/DIS 13271:2011 Stationary source emissions-Determination of PM10/PM2,5 mass concentration in flue gas-Measurement at higher concentrations by use of virtual impactors[S].2011.
【6】US EPA．Method 201A-determination of PM10 and PM2.5emissions from stationary sources[S].2012．
【7】PM2. 5 emissions from stationary sources[S]. 2012.
【8】US EPA． Method 202-dry impinger method for determining condensible particulate emissions from stationary sources[S]．2012．
【9】US EPA． Other test method 28 ( OTM 28) -dry impinger method for determining condensable particulate emissions from stationary sources[S]．2012．
【10】朱少平,刘含笑,郦建国,等.电子低压冲击器不同稀释比对PM2.5排放测试的影响[J].电力与能源,2014(2)：141-143.
【2】刘含笑,姚宇平,郦建国,等.PM2.5团聚测量技术及其研究进展[J].电力与能源,2013(4)：118-123.
【3】莫华,朱法华,王圣.火电行业大气污染物排放对PM2.5的贡献及减排对策[J].中国电力,2013,46(8).
【4】ISO 23210:2009 Stationary source emissions-Determination of PM10/PM2,5 mass concentration in flue gas-Measurement at low concentrations by use of impactors[S].2009.
【5】ISO/DIS 13271:2011 Stationary source emissions-Determination of PM10/PM2,5 mass concentration in flue gas-Measurement at higher concentrations by use of virtual impactors[S].2011.
【6】US EPA．Method 201A-determination of PM10 and PM2.5emissions from stationary sources[S].2012．
【7】PM2. 5 emissions from stationary sources[S]. 2012.
【8】US EPA． Method 202-dry impinger method for determining condensible particulate emissions from stationary sources[S]．2012．
【9】US EPA． Other test method 28 ( OTM 28) -dry impinger method for determining condensable particulate emissions from stationary sources[S]．2012．
【10】朱少平,刘含笑,郦建国,等.电子低压冲击器不同稀释比对PM2.5排放测试的影响[J].电力与能源,2014(2)：141-143.
相关信息
