Basic Principle and Evaluation Method of Measurement Uncertainty and Evaluation Illustrations in Material Detection Lecture No.1 Basic Principle and Definitions of Measurement Uncertainty
摘 要
在实验室质量体系运行中, 测量不确定度评定及其应用是非常重要的。为此, 该专题报告论述了测量不确定度的基本原理及其在材料检测中的应用。根据新发布的JJF 1059.1-2012介绍了有关的术语和定义、测量不确定度的评定、有效位数、评定中应注意的问题、报告与表示等。并对热轧带肋钢筋拉伸试验结果、光学显微镜检测钢材的脱碳层厚度试验结果、原子吸收分光光度计测定铜含量的结果进行了详细的不确定度评定, 以作为测量不确定度在材料检测中应用的典型实例。
Abstract
The evaluation and applications of measurement uncertainty are very important in operations of the laboratory′s quality system. For this reason, the basic principle of measurement uncertainty and its applications in detection of materials were discussed. The terms and definitions, evaluation of measurement uncertainty, significant places of number, advertent problems for evaluation of measurement uncertainty, report and expression etc. were also introduced according to the recently released JJF 1059.1-2012. Moreover, the tensile testing results of hot rolled ribbed steel bars, the testing results of decarburized depth for steel by optical metallurgical microscope, determination results for the concentration of copper by atomic absorption spectrophotometer were evaluated in detail, which were provided as typical illustrations of applications for measurement uncertainty in detection of materials.
中图分类号 TB115 O241
所属栏目 专题讲座
基金项目
收稿日期 2013/7/15
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
备注王承忠(1941-), 男, 教授级高级工程师, 中国合格评定国家认可委员会(CNAS)主任评审员、CNAS实验室评审员教师, CNAS-GL 10:2006《材料理化检验测量不确定度评估指南及实例》主编, 中国实验室资质认定(计量认证、验收、授权等) 国家级评审员。
引用该论文: WANG Cheng-zhong. Basic Principle and Evaluation Method of Measurement Uncertainty and Evaluation Illustrations in Material Detection Lecture No.1 Basic Principle and Definitions of Measurement Uncertainty[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis part A:Physical Testing, 2013, 49(9): 597~604
王承忠. 测量不确定度基本原理和评定方法及在材料检测中的评定实例 第一讲测量不确定度的基本原理和定义[J]. 理化检验-物理分册, 2013, 49(9): 597~604
被引情况:
【1】王俊,王玉玲, "金属材料力学性能测试不确定度评定的探讨",理化检验-物理分册 50, 818-821(2014)
【2】黄旭东, "H96黄铜棒导电率测试结果的不确定度评定",理化检验-物理分册 52, 450-453(2016)
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
相关信息