Contraction Strain Ratio Determination and Its Influencing Factors of TA18 Titanium Alloy Tube
摘 要
对TA18钛合金管收缩应变比rCS的测定原理和方法进行了探讨, 同时分析了影响rCS测定的几种因素。结果表明: 取样长度、热处理状态、拉伸速率和伸长率终止条件等因素均对rCS的测定结果有显著影响, 导致rCS测定结果偏低或重现性较差。对于本试验12 mm×0.8 mm的TA18钛合管, 其rCS测定合适的试验条件如下: 试样热处理状态为退火态, 取样长度为150 mm, 两端堵头长度为30 mm, 拉伸速率为1 mm·min-1或2 mm·min-1, 试验终止条件为7%伸长率。
Abstract
The determination principle and method of contraction strain ratio rCS of TA18 titanium alloy tube were discussed. At the same time, several factors influencing the determination of rCS were analyzed. The results show that factors such as sampling length, heat treatment condition, tensile rate and elongation terminating condition all had significant effects on the testing results of rCS, resulting in lower testing results or poor reproducibility. For the test 12 mm×0.8 mm TA18 titanium alloy tube, the feasible determination conditions of rCS were as follows: the heat treatment condition of specimen was annealing state, the sampling length was 150 mm, the plug length was 30 mm, the tensile rate was 1 mm·min-1 or 2 mm·min-1, and the test terminating elongation was 7%.
中图分类号 TG146.1 DOI 10.11973/lhjy-wl201612007
所属栏目 试验技术与方法
基金项目
收稿日期 2016/8/1
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
联系人作者庞君保(45648055@qq.com)
备注庞君保(1971-), 男, 工程师, 主要从事钛合金理化性能检验工作,
引用该论文: PANG Jun-bao,TANG Shou-quan,WANG Li-chang. Contraction Strain Ratio Determination and Its Influencing Factors of TA18 Titanium Alloy Tube[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis part A:Physical Testing, 2016, 52(12): 864~867
庞君保,唐寿全,王立昌. TA18钛合金管收缩应变比的测定及其影响因素[J]. 理化检验-物理分册, 2016, 52(12): 864~867
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】BOYER R R. An overview on the use of titanium in the aerospace industry[J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A,1996,213(1):103-114.
【2】江志强,杨合,詹梅,等.钛合金管材研制及其在航空领域应用的现状与前景[J].塑性工程学报,2009,16(4):44-50,84.
【3】杨磊,惠松骁,叶文君,等.TA18钛合金管材织构的测试与EBSD分析[J].稀有金属,2011,35(6):928-933.
【4】张旺峰,王玉会,李艳,等.高强度TA18合金管材性能评价与控制方法研究[J].稀有金属材料与工程,2012,41(7):1239-1242.
【5】刘瑞堂.工程材料力学性能[M].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学出版社,2001.
【6】潘淑杰,祝铁柱,于兆斌,等.金属材料室温拉伸试验速率控制方法和夹持系统的选择[J].理化检验-物理分册,2014,50(2):94-96.
【7】赵美兰,王洪涛,邱亮,等.横梁位移速率控制拉伸试验速率的解读与实践[J].理化检验-物理分册,2014,50(4):239-245.
【2】江志强,杨合,詹梅,等.钛合金管材研制及其在航空领域应用的现状与前景[J].塑性工程学报,2009,16(4):44-50,84.
【3】杨磊,惠松骁,叶文君,等.TA18钛合金管材织构的测试与EBSD分析[J].稀有金属,2011,35(6):928-933.
【4】张旺峰,王玉会,李艳,等.高强度TA18合金管材性能评价与控制方法研究[J].稀有金属材料与工程,2012,41(7):1239-1242.
【5】刘瑞堂.工程材料力学性能[M].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学出版社,2001.
【6】潘淑杰,祝铁柱,于兆斌,等.金属材料室温拉伸试验速率控制方法和夹持系统的选择[J].理化检验-物理分册,2014,50(2):94-96.
【7】赵美兰,王洪涛,邱亮,等.横梁位移速率控制拉伸试验速率的解读与实践[J].理化检验-物理分册,2014,50(4):239-245.
相关信息