Analysis on Tripping Reasons of a Repaired Tube in One Well
摘 要
塔里木油田某井在起甩射孔完井一体化管柱时,发现第43根油管现场端脱扣。脱扣油管为ø73.02 mm×5.51 mm修复油管,降级为N80钢级使用。为分析该油管脱扣原因,对脱扣油管及同批次修复未使用的油管取样,进行了理化检验和分析。结果表明:修复油管材料和力学性能都符合标准要求;同批次修复的油管有螺纹参数不合格和粘扣现象发生,但修复油管拉伸至失效载荷符合API TR 5C3-2008中规定的失效载荷不小于471.5 kN的要求,因此螺纹参数不合格并不是导致油管脱扣的主要原因。进一步对脱扣油管宏观形貌及油管脱扣时管柱的受力情况进行分析,认为油管脱扣的主要原因是上扣过程中发生错扣,导致油管粘扣和上扣不到位,使得接头的连接强度大幅度降低,最终发生了低载荷滑脱失效。
Abstract
Thread tripping happened to the forty-third oil tube in one well of Tarim Oilfield during playing out perforated completion integrated pipe string. The tripping tube was a ø73.02 mm×5.51 mm repaired tube, which was degraded to N80 steel. The tripping tube and several unused tubes of the same repairing batch were sampled and tested physically and chemically to analyze the tripping reasons. The results show that:the material and mechanical properties of the repaired tube all met the requirements of standards; unqualified thread parameter and galling phenomenon happened to the repaired tubes of the same batch, however the tensile failure load of the repaired tubes met the requirements of API TR 5C3-2008 that the failure load should be no less than 471.5 kN, so the unqualified thread parameter was not the main reason for the tripping of the oil tube. The macro morphology of the oil tube and stress situation of the tubing string during tripping were further analyzed, it was considered that the main reason of the thread tripping was thread alternating during making-up, which made the tube galling and incompletely making up. The joint strength of the joint was greatly reduced, and a low load slip failure happened at last.
中图分类号 TE931 DOI 10.11973/lhjy-wl201701011
所属栏目 质量控制与失效分析
基金项目
收稿日期 2016/3/3
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
备注李岩(1986-),女,工程师,硕士,主要从事油井管研究工作,liyan4195@163.com。
引用该论文: LI Yan,XIE Jun-feng,ZHANG Xu,SONG Ming-zhe,LIU Jiang-yu,ZHAO Mi-feng. Analysis on Tripping Reasons of a Repaired Tube in One Well[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis part A:Physical Testing, 2017, 53(1): 46~50
李岩,谢俊峰,张旭,宋明哲,刘豇瑜,赵密锋. 某井修复油管脱扣原因分析[J]. 理化检验-物理分册, 2017, 53(1): 46~50
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】吕拴录,杨向同,周理志,等.ZXG6-1井88.9 mm特殊螺纹接头油管脱扣原因分析[J].石油管材与仪器,2015(1):50-54.
【2】高林,吕拴录,李鹤林,等.油、套管脱扣、挤毁和破裂失效分析[J].理化检验-物理分册,2013,49(3):177-181.
【3】张钧,赵国仙,吕祥鸿,等.塔里木油田某井油管脱扣原因分析[J].理化检验-物理分册,2014,50(11):845-848.
【4】潘志勇,韩新利,王新虎,等.某油井圆螺纹套管接头脱扣原因分析[J].理化检验-物理分册,2015,51(2):143-146.
【2】高林,吕拴录,李鹤林,等.油、套管脱扣、挤毁和破裂失效分析[J].理化检验-物理分册,2013,49(3):177-181.
【3】张钧,赵国仙,吕祥鸿,等.塔里木油田某井油管脱扣原因分析[J].理化检验-物理分册,2014,50(11):845-848.
【4】潘志勇,韩新利,王新虎,等.某油井圆螺纹套管接头脱扣原因分析[J].理化检验-物理分册,2015,51(2):143-146.
相关信息