Failure Analysis on Cracking of G105 Drill Pipes in a Well
摘 要
通过宏观检验、化学成分分析、金相分析、力学性能测试、扫描电镜和能谱分析等方法,对某井发生批量开裂的G105钻杆进行了分析。结果表明:该批钻杆硬度达到33 HRC,远高于NACE MR 0175-2009对抗硫化物应力腐蚀开裂(SSCC)材料最高硬度要求值22 HRC,钻杆的硫化物应力腐蚀开裂敏感性较高;钻杆开裂主要为硫化氢应力腐蚀而导致的脆性开裂,同时井底存在的CO2和Cl-加速了其腐蚀进程。建议在含有H2S气体的环境下使用抗硫钻杆进行作业,从而有效防止钻杆发生硫化氢应力腐蚀开裂。
Abstract
The batch cracking causes of G105 drill pipes in a well were analyzed by means of macro observation, chemical composition analysis, metallographic analysis, mechanical property test, scanning electron microscope and energy spectrum analysis and so on. The results show that the hardness of the drill pipe reached 33 HRC which was much higher than the required value of MR NACE 0175-2009 (≤22 HRC) for the sulfide stress corrosion cracking (SSCC) resistant material, so the SSCC susceptibility of the drill pipes was very high. The cracking of the drill pipes was brittle cracking mainly caused by the hydrogen sulfide stress corrosion, and at the same time CO2 and Cl-1 in the well accelerated the corrosion process. It was suggested that anti-sulfur drill pipes should be used in the environment containing H2S gas to effectively prevent the drill pipes from hydrogen sulfide stress corrosion cracking.
中图分类号 TB304 DOI 10.11973/lhjy-wl201706014
所属栏目 质量控制与失效分析
基金项目
收稿日期 2016/6/7
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
备注陈猛(1985—),男,工程师,主要从事石油钻具的研发与失效分析方面的工作,hengmingchen@163.com
引用该论文: CHEN Meng,YU Shijie,YUAN Pengbin,GONG Danmei,LUO Rui. Failure Analysis on Cracking of G105 Drill Pipes in a Well[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis part A:Physical Testing, 2017, 53(6): 437~441
陈猛,余世杰,袁鹏斌,龚丹梅,罗睿. 某井G105钻杆开裂失效分析[J]. 理化检验-物理分册, 2017, 53(6): 437~441
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】董绍华,吕英民,李启楷.氢致裂纹扩展的分形研究进展[J].中国腐蚀与防护学报, 2001,21(3):188-192.
【2】吕向阳,尹士科,张有为.高强钢焊接氢致裂纹断口微观形貌的研究及模式化[J].钢铁研究学报,1990,2(4):41-49.
【3】刘文广.H2S应力腐蚀开裂和氢致开裂的评定[J].石油与天然气化工,2011,40(5):468-469.
【4】孙亮.氢陷阱与氢致开裂关系的理论综述[J].石油化工腐蚀与防护,1989,6(3):17-19,63.
【5】王恋,张术宽,李荣莘,等.液化石油气地下储罐焊缝裂纹分析[J].金属热处理,2007,32(增刊1):131-133.
【6】朱晏萱.N80钢硫化氢腐蚀行为研究[D].大庆:大庆石油学院,2008.
【7】龚丹梅,余世杰,袁鹏斌,等.L80油管腐蚀穿孔原因[J].腐蚀与防护,2014,35(9):959-963.
【2】吕向阳,尹士科,张有为.高强钢焊接氢致裂纹断口微观形貌的研究及模式化[J].钢铁研究学报,1990,2(4):41-49.
【3】刘文广.H2S应力腐蚀开裂和氢致开裂的评定[J].石油与天然气化工,2011,40(5):468-469.
【4】孙亮.氢陷阱与氢致开裂关系的理论综述[J].石油化工腐蚀与防护,1989,6(3):17-19,63.
【5】王恋,张术宽,李荣莘,等.液化石油气地下储罐焊缝裂纹分析[J].金属热处理,2007,32(增刊1):131-133.
【6】朱晏萱.N80钢硫化氢腐蚀行为研究[D].大庆:大庆石油学院,2008.
【7】龚丹梅,余世杰,袁鹏斌,等.L80油管腐蚀穿孔原因[J].腐蚀与防护,2014,35(9):959-963.
相关信息