Failure Analysis on Leakage of T91 Steel Reheater Tubes in a 350 MW Subcritical Power Unit
摘 要
国内某电厂引进型350 MW亚临界锅炉运行1.2×105 h后在进行水压试验时,其三级再热器T91钢管道在定位滑块焊接处出现多处泄漏失效现象。对其中两根发生泄漏的T91钢管进行割管取样,通过宏观分析、化学成分分析、力学性能试验、金相检验、扫描电镜以及能谱分析等方法,对其泄漏原因进行了分析。结果表明:焊接工艺执行不当,造成T91钢管在焊接定位滑块时局部管壁被焊穿,同时焊缝中存在气孔等缺陷,是导致其在水压试验时发生泄漏失效的主要原因。
Abstract
For an imported 350 MW subcritical boiler of a power plant in China, multiple leakage failure phenomenon occured to the third stage reheater T91 steel tubes at the slider welding positions during hydraulic test after operation for 1.2×105 h. Two typical leakage tubes were cut and the leakage reasons were analyzed by means of macroscopic analysis, chemical composition analysis, mechanical property test, metallographic examination, scanning electron microscope and energy spectrum analysis and so on. The results show the improper welding process resulted in local tube wall burn-through and pore defect when welding sliders, which was the main reason for the leakage of the T91 steel tubes during hydraulic test.
中图分类号 TG406 DOI 10.11973/lhjy-wl201708016
所属栏目 质量控制与失效分析
基金项目
收稿日期 2016/8/2
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
备注卢权(1982-),男,博士研究生,主要从事金属材料腐蚀与防护方面的研究
引用该论文: LU Quan,SUN Li,LU Qiliang,CHEN Wei. Failure Analysis on Leakage of T91 Steel Reheater Tubes in a 350 MW Subcritical Power Unit[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis part A:Physical Testing, 2017, 53(8): 607~610
卢权,孙莉,陆启亮,陈伟. 350 MW亚临界机组T91钢再热器管泄漏失效分析[J]. 理化检验-物理分册, 2017, 53(8): 607~610
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】李天.沙角A电厂5号锅炉再热器管泄漏原因分析及处理[J].中国电力,2005,38(5):63-65.
【2】张玉军,王玉兴.660 MW机组再热器管间支撑焊缝泄漏原因分析[J].华电技术,2009,31(9):39-41.
【3】王俊霖,刘敏,张萍,等.T91高温过热器管爆裂原因分析[J].理化检验-物理分册,2013,49(9):618-621,624.
【4】沈美华,祝新伟,潘金平,等.电站锅炉热管常见泄漏原因及主要特征[J].理化检验-物理分册,2013,49(8):533-537.
【2】张玉军,王玉兴.660 MW机组再热器管间支撑焊缝泄漏原因分析[J].华电技术,2009,31(9):39-41.
【3】王俊霖,刘敏,张萍,等.T91高温过热器管爆裂原因分析[J].理化检验-物理分册,2013,49(9):618-621,624.
【4】沈美华,祝新伟,潘金平,等.电站锅炉热管常见泄漏原因及主要特征[J].理化检验-物理分册,2013,49(8):533-537.
相关信息