Comparison among Domestic and Overseas Standards of Instrumented Impact Test of Metallic Materials
摘 要
对EN ISO 14556:2015,GB/T 19748-2005,ASTM E2298-15仪器化冲击试验方法标准的主要区别进行了对比,特别是各标准的仪器设备要求、适用的试样尺寸及类型、力-位移曲线类型的判定、韧性断面率的评价等,对正在修订国标中新增的内容也予以了说明。结果表明:ASTM标准在仪器设备方面要求更高,但ISO及GB的可行性更好;ISO及ASTM标准覆盖了小夏比V型缺口试样(MCVN试样)的试验部分,使得试验内容更加丰富,但实际试验情况显示小尺寸试样的力-位移特征曲线稳定性不如10 mm×10 mm×55 mm尺寸标准试样的;利用各标准中提供的计算公式对韧性断面率进行评价时,计算公式及特征系数K值的选择对试验结果有很大影响;正在修订国标中加入了裂纹形成能Wi及裂纹扩展能Wp的概念,使得在力-位移特征曲线Fm的后段部分进一步得到细化,具有一定的理论研究价值。
Abstract
The main differences of instrumented impact testing standards for EN ISO 14556:2015, GB/T 19748-2005 and ASTM E2298-15 were compared, especially the equipment requirements, applicable sample size and type, determination of force-displacement type, determination of percent shear area on fracture surface and so on, the new content in GB was also explained. The results show that ASTM standard has higher instrumentation requirements, but the feasibility of ISO and GB is better, ISO and ASTM standards include the testing part of miniaturized Charpy V-notch specimens, which has enriched contents of test. But the actual testing results show that the force-displacement curve of small size sample is less stable than the standard sample of 10 mm×10 mm×55 mm, the choice of formula and characteristic coefficient K have great influence on the determination of the percent shear area on fracture surface, the new definition of crack forming energy Wi and crack propagation energy Wp were added into GB, so that the back section of force-displacement characteristic curve was further refined, which has certain theoretical research value.
中图分类号 TG115.5+6 DOI 10.11973/lhjy-wl201803006
所属栏目 标准化
基金项目 上海材料研究所技术创新项目(16SG-15)
收稿日期 2017/6/30
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
备注许鹤君(1987-),男,工程师,硕士,主要从事金属材料力学性能测试工作,xuhejun1987@outlook.com
引用该论文: XU Hejun,ZHANG Jianwei,LING Xiao,BA Fahai. Comparison among Domestic and Overseas Standards of Instrumented Impact Test of Metallic Materials[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis part A:Physical Testing, 2018, 54(3): 181~186
许鹤君,张建伟,凌霄,巴发海. 金属材料仪器化冲击试验方法国内外标准比较[J]. 理化检验-物理分册, 2018, 54(3): 181~186
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】唐振廷, 张钰彦,董莉. 国家标准《钢材夏比Ⅴ型缺口摆锤冲击试验仪器化试验方法》介绍和述评[J]. 冶金标准化与质量,2004,42(2):18-24.
【2】LUCON E, CHAOUADI R, VAN WALLE E. Different approaches for the verification of force values measured with instrumented charpy strikers[J]. Journal of ASTM International,2005,3(3):7.
【3】GB/T 30069.1-2013金属材料高应变速率拉伸试验第1部分:弹性杆型系统[S].
【4】BS EN ISO 148-1:2010 Metallic materials-Charpy pendulum impact test-Part 1:Test method[S].
【5】GB/T 229-2007金属材料夏比摆锤冲击试验方法[S].
【6】ASTM E23-16b Standard test methods for notched bar impact testing of metallic materials[S].
【7】ASTM E2248-15 Standard test method for impact testing of miniaturized charpy V-notch specimens[S].
【8】ASTM A370-15 Standard test methods and definitions for mechanical testing of steel products[S].
【9】许鹤君. 金属材料韧脆转变温度检测中的一些关键问题[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2017,53(6):422-427.
【2】LUCON E, CHAOUADI R, VAN WALLE E. Different approaches for the verification of force values measured with instrumented charpy strikers[J]. Journal of ASTM International,2005,3(3):7.
【3】GB/T 30069.1-2013金属材料高应变速率拉伸试验第1部分:弹性杆型系统[S].
【4】BS EN ISO 148-1:2010 Metallic materials-Charpy pendulum impact test-Part 1:Test method[S].
【5】GB/T 229-2007金属材料夏比摆锤冲击试验方法[S].
【6】ASTM E23-16b Standard test methods for notched bar impact testing of metallic materials[S].
【7】ASTM E2248-15 Standard test method for impact testing of miniaturized charpy V-notch specimens[S].
【8】ASTM A370-15 Standard test methods and definitions for mechanical testing of steel products[S].
【9】许鹤君. 金属材料韧脆转变温度检测中的一些关键问题[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2017,53(6):422-427.
相关信息