Analyses of Anti-erosion Performance of Drilling Cross under Emergent Discharge Conditions
摘 要
针对大排量应急放喷工况下钻井四通冲蚀问题,运用CFD软件模拟了钻井四通在日放喷量为100~1 000万m3、日出砂量为7.5~38.5 m3工况下的冲蚀情况。结果表明:随着日放喷量的增加,四通支管段气体流速增至当地音速,且压降增至0.98 MPa;当日放喷量超过300万m3,四通内壁主要冲蚀区域由主通上壁面转移至主通与支管连接处和支管末端,最大冲蚀速率增至19.42×10-7 kg/(s·m2);当日放喷量为1 000万m3、日出砂量由7.7 m3增大至38.5 m3时,最大冲蚀速率由3.68×10-7 kg/(s·m2)增至19.42×10-7 kg/(s·m2),模拟结果与现场实测数据基本吻合。
Abstract
Aiming at the problem of erosion of drilling cross in large displacement and emergent discharge condition, CFD software was used to simulate the erosion of the drilling cross in working conditions of daily discharge capacity of 1-10 million m3 and sunrise sand volume of 7.5-38.5 m3. The results show that with the increase of daily discharge volume, the gas flow rate of branch pipe section of the drilling cross increased to the local sound velocity, and the pressure drop increased to 0.98 MPa. When the discharge volume was more than 3 million m3, the main erosion regions of the inner wall of the drilling cross were transferred from the upper wall of main passage to the joint of main passage and branch pipe and the end of the branch pipe, and the maximum erosion rate increased to 19.42×10-7 kg/(s·m2). When the discharge volume was more than 10 million m3 and the sand volume increased from 7.7 m3 to 38.5 m3, the maximum erosion rate increased from 3.68×10-7 kg/(s·m2) to 19.42×10-7 kg/(s·m2). The simulation results are basically consistent with measured field data.
中图分类号 TG174 DOI 10.11973/fsyfh-201809010
所属栏目 应用技术
基金项目 国家自然科学基金项目(51374177)
收稿日期 2017/10/15
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
引用该论文: CHEN Dongbo,ZHANG Enbo,LI Shuanggui,LI Dandan,ZHU Hongjun,ZENG Dezhi. Analyses of Anti-erosion Performance of Drilling Cross under Emergent Discharge Conditions[J]. Corrosion & Protection, 2018, 39(9): 698
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】张智,付建红,施太和,等. 高酸性气井钻井过程中的井控机理[J]. 天然气工业,2008,28(4):56-58.
【2】阎凯,李锋. 塔里木油田井控技术研究[J]. 地球物理学进展,2008,23(2):522-527.
【3】吴志均,陈刚,郎淑敏,等. 天然气钻井井控技术的发展[J]. 石油钻采工艺,2010,32(5):56-60.
【4】宋周成,何世明,安文华,等. 塔中62-27井控压钻井实践[J]. 钻采工艺,2009,32(2):104-105.
【5】LIU H X,LIU P,FAN D C,et al. A new erosion experiment and numerical simulation of wellhead device in nitrogen drilling[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering,2016,28:389-396.
【6】胥志雄,田增,王延民,等. 氮气钻井过程中井口多功能四通的使用寿命[J]. 理化检验-物理分册,2015,51(7):459-461.
【7】何江华,刘绘新,艾志久,等. 氮气钻井多功能四通防冲蚀结构改进[J]. 石油机械,2014,42(4):7-10.
【8】邹康,王健功,杨赟达,等. 气体钻井对井口四通冲蚀磨损规律研究[J]. 石油机械,2015,43(1):21-26.
【9】温胜斌. 气体钻井井口装置冲蚀机理研究[D]. 成都:西南石油大学,2015.
【10】ZHU H J,WANG J,BA B,et al. Numerical investigation of flow erosion and flow induced displacement of gas well relief line[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2015,37:19-32.
【11】ZHU H J,LIN Y H,ZENG D Z,et al. Numerical analysis of flow erosion on drill pipe in gas drilling[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis,2012,22:83-91.
【12】郑玉贵,姚治铭,柯伟. 流体力学因素对冲刷腐蚀的影响机制[J]. 腐蚀科学与防护技术,2000,12(1):37-40.
【2】阎凯,李锋. 塔里木油田井控技术研究[J]. 地球物理学进展,2008,23(2):522-527.
【3】吴志均,陈刚,郎淑敏,等. 天然气钻井井控技术的发展[J]. 石油钻采工艺,2010,32(5):56-60.
【4】宋周成,何世明,安文华,等. 塔中62-27井控压钻井实践[J]. 钻采工艺,2009,32(2):104-105.
【5】LIU H X,LIU P,FAN D C,et al. A new erosion experiment and numerical simulation of wellhead device in nitrogen drilling[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering,2016,28:389-396.
【6】胥志雄,田增,王延民,等. 氮气钻井过程中井口多功能四通的使用寿命[J]. 理化检验-物理分册,2015,51(7):459-461.
【7】何江华,刘绘新,艾志久,等. 氮气钻井多功能四通防冲蚀结构改进[J]. 石油机械,2014,42(4):7-10.
【8】邹康,王健功,杨赟达,等. 气体钻井对井口四通冲蚀磨损规律研究[J]. 石油机械,2015,43(1):21-26.
【9】温胜斌. 气体钻井井口装置冲蚀机理研究[D]. 成都:西南石油大学,2015.
【10】ZHU H J,WANG J,BA B,et al. Numerical investigation of flow erosion and flow induced displacement of gas well relief line[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries,2015,37:19-32.
【11】ZHU H J,LIN Y H,ZENG D Z,et al. Numerical analysis of flow erosion on drill pipe in gas drilling[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis,2012,22:83-91.
【12】郑玉贵,姚治铭,柯伟. 流体力学因素对冲刷腐蚀的影响机制[J]. 腐蚀科学与防护技术,2000,12(1):37-40.
相关信息