Cause Analysis on Piercing of the φ101.6 mm G105 Drill Pipe in a Well
摘 要
某公司在钻井作业时发生一根φ101.6 mm×8.38 mm G105钢级钻杆刺穿失效事故。采用直读光谱仪、拉伸试验机、光学显微镜、扫描电镜、能谱仪等设备对刺穿钻杆的化学成分、力学性能、显微组织以及断口等进行了分析,并且结合钻井过程中的实际井况对钻杆进行了刺孔腐蚀机理分析、加厚过渡带有限元分析。结果表明:此次钻杆刺穿为早期腐蚀疲劳失效,疲劳裂纹起源于钻杆加厚过渡带消失区域内壁的腐蚀坑底部;失效钻杆没有内涂层,钻杆钻进过程中,在交变载荷的作用下于应力集中的加厚过渡带消失区域腐蚀坑底部萌生腐蚀疲劳裂纹,裂纹不断扩展最终造成刺穿失效。最后根据此次钻杆产生早期腐蚀疲劳裂纹的原因提出了相应的改进建议。
Abstract
Piercing failure accident happened to a φ101.6 mm×8.38 mm G105 steel grade drill pipe during drilling operation in a company. The chemical compositions, mechanical properties, microstructure and fracture surface of the pierced drill pipe were analyzed by direct reading spectrometer, tensile machine, optical microscope, scanning electron microscope and energy spectrometer. And combined with the actual well condition during the drilling operation, the piercing corrosion mechanism of the drill pipe and the finite element analysis of the thickened transition zone were analyzed. The results show that the piercing of the drill pipe was an early corrosion fatigue failure, and the fatigue cracks originated from the bottom of the corrosion pits at the inner wall of the drill pipe where the thickened transition zone disappeared. The failure drill pipe had no inner coating, and under the action of the alternating load, corrosion fatigue cracks originated from the bottom of the corrosion pits of the stress concentrated thickened transition zone disappearing position. The cracks continued to expand and eventually caused the piercing failure. Finally, according to the reasons of the early corrosion fatigue of the drill pipe, the corresponding improvement suggestions were put forward.
中图分类号 TG142.33 DOI 10.11973/lhjy-wl201812012
所属栏目 质量控制与失效分析
基金项目
收稿日期 2017/9/4
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
备注陈猛(1985-),男,工程师,主要从事石油钻具的研发与失效分析方面的工作,hengmingchen@163.com
引用该论文: CHEN Meng,YU Shijie,OUYANG Zhiying. Cause Analysis on Piercing of the φ101.6 mm G105 Drill Pipe in a Well[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis part A:Physical Testing, 2018, 54(12): 909~914
陈猛,余世杰,欧阳志英. 某井φ101.6 mm G105钻杆刺穿原因分析[J]. 理化检验-物理分册, 2018, 54(12): 909~914
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】郭生武,袁鹏斌. 油田腐蚀形态导论[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社,2005.
【2】杨相同,吕拴录,柳栋,等. 某井修井遇阻及油管和套管失效原因分析[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2015,51(2):147-150,154.
【3】帅亚民. 某井φ127 mm S135钻杆刺穿失效分析[C]//李鹤林,冯耀荣. 石油管材与装备失效分析案例集. 北京:石油工业出版社,2006:140-146.
【4】叶顶鹏,王瑞成,崔顺贤,等. φ127 mm S135钻杆刺漏失效分析[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2009,45(8):514-516.
【5】李方,刘永刚,林凯,等. G105油井钻杆失效分析[J]. 金属热处理,2009,34(10):94-97.
【6】朱丽娟,刘永刚,李方坡,等. G105钢制钻杆腐蚀失效的原因[J]. 腐蚀与防护,2016,37(9):775.
【7】黄辉,马红莲,何仁洋,等. 某天然气站场管道典型管件内腐蚀原因分析[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2015,51(9):653-656.
【8】关宝印. 石油钻杆内涂层防腐蚀[J]. 化学工程师,1993,31(1):46-48.
【2】杨相同,吕拴录,柳栋,等. 某井修井遇阻及油管和套管失效原因分析[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2015,51(2):147-150,154.
【3】帅亚民. 某井φ127 mm S135钻杆刺穿失效分析[C]//李鹤林,冯耀荣. 石油管材与装备失效分析案例集. 北京:石油工业出版社,2006:140-146.
【4】叶顶鹏,王瑞成,崔顺贤,等. φ127 mm S135钻杆刺漏失效分析[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2009,45(8):514-516.
【5】李方,刘永刚,林凯,等. G105油井钻杆失效分析[J]. 金属热处理,2009,34(10):94-97.
【6】朱丽娟,刘永刚,李方坡,等. G105钢制钻杆腐蚀失效的原因[J]. 腐蚀与防护,2016,37(9):775.
【7】黄辉,马红莲,何仁洋,等. 某天然气站场管道典型管件内腐蚀原因分析[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2015,51(9):653-656.
【8】关宝印. 石油钻杆内涂层防腐蚀[J]. 化学工程师,1993,31(1):46-48.
相关信息