Dynamic Fluctuation Characteristics of Pipe-to-Soil Potential on Buried Pipelines under Interference of Stray Current from Subway
摘 要
对北京、上海、深圳、无锡等4个城市监测的地铁动态直流干扰下埋地管道管地电位数据进行了系统分析,统计了不同城市地铁杂散电流干扰下管地电位的波动周期、周期分布、波动幅值等动态特征,分析了管地通电电位对断电电位的影响,总结了地铁杂散电流干扰下管地电位动态波动规律。结果表明:在地铁运行时段,管地通电电位波动剧烈,波动存在周期性变化;同一城市内不同监测点管地通电电位波动周期分布比例基本相同,不同城市的分布比例相差不大;各地的通电电位波动范围不同,受干扰程度也不同;管地通电电位与断电电位的波动周期相一致,管地通电电位的波动对断电电位存在较小影响。
Abstract
The pipe-to-soil potential data of underground pipeline under dynamic DC interference caused by subways and monitored in Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen and Wuxi were analyzed systematically. The dynamic characteristics such as fluctuation period, period distribution and fluctuation amplitude of the pipe-to-soil potential under the disturbance of subway stray current were calculated in different cities. The effect of pipe-to-soil switch-on potential on switch-off potential was studied, and the law of pipe-to-soil potential fluctuation dynamically caused by the stray currents from subways was summarized. The results show that in the running periods of subways, the pipe-to-soil switch-on potentials fluctuated drastically, and the fluctuations were periodic. The distribution proportions of fluctuation periods of the pipe-to-soil swtich-on potentials were nearly the same for different monitoring points in the same city, and were similar for different cities. The fluctuation amplitudes and interference degrees of pipe-to-soil potentials were different in different cities. The fluctuation periods of pipe-to-soil switch-on and switch-off potentials were coincided, and the fluctuation of switch-on potential had a small effect on switch-off potential.
中图分类号 TG172 DOI 10.11973/fsyfh-201912003
所属栏目 试验研究
基金项目 国家留学基金项目(201606465052);国家重点研发计划专项项目(2016YFC0802101;2016YFC0802103)
收稿日期 2018/5/9
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
引用该论文: ZHU Xiangjian,DU Yanxia,QIN Huimin,ZHANG Yi,GE Caigang. Dynamic Fluctuation Characteristics of Pipe-to-Soil Potential on Buried Pipelines under Interference of Stray Current from Subway[J]. Corrosion & Protection, 2019, 40(12): 878
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】陈志光, 秦朝葵, 马飞. 轨道交通动态直流杂散电流检测及判定[J]. 煤气与热力, 2011,31(10): 35-39.
【2】计雪松, 秦朝葵. 杂散电流对埋地燃气管道的腐蚀及其监测[J]. 上海煤气, 2007(4): 12-15, 46.
【3】刘文权. 城市地铁杂散电流对埋地输油管道的危害[J]. 全面腐蚀控制, 2014,28(11): 29-32.
【4】颜达峰,刘乃勇,袁鹏斌,等. 地铁维修基地杂散电流对埋地钢质管道的腐蚀及防护措施[J]. 腐蚀与防护, 2013, 34(8): 739-742.
【5】高玉珍. 轨交杂散电流对天然气主干网的腐蚀影响及防护探究[J]. 上海煤气, 2016(2): 6-11, 31.
【6】徐颢, 李代莉. 轨道交通直流杂散电流给埋地钢管防腐系统带来的新风险[J]. 城市燃气, 2016(3): 12-17.
【7】吴祥祖,张庆贺,高卫平. 地铁杂散电流产生机理及其防护措施[J]. 建筑安全,2003(5): 28-30.
【8】ZAKOWSKI K, DAROWICKI K, ORLIKOWSKI J, et al. Electrolytic corrosion of water pipeline system in the remote distance from stray currents: case study[J]. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2016, 4: 116-124.
【9】ROGELIO DE LAS C, RON T, KRISTI R. Dynamic stray current interference testing and mitigation design for a 90-inch water main[C]//Corroson 2009. Atlanta, GA: NACE, 2009: 09547.
【10】陈志光, 秦朝葵, 夏沁. 轨道交通杂散电流对埋地燃气管道影响的实验研究[J]. 世界科技研究与发展, 2012, 34(5): 740-742.
【11】QIAN S, CHENGYF. Accelerated corrosion of pipeline steel and reduced cathodic protection effectiveness under direct current interference[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 148: 675-685.
【12】王力伟,唐兴华,王新华,等. 基于分形的管线钢直流杂散电流腐蚀行为[J]. 腐蚀与防护,2014,35(3): 218-223.
【13】王新华,刘菊银,何仁洋,等. 轨道交通动态杂散电流对埋地管道的干扰腐蚀试验[J]. 腐蚀与防护,2010,31(3):193-197.
【14】张玉星, 杜艳霞, 路民旭. 动态直流杂散电流干扰下埋地管道的腐蚀行为[J]. 腐蚀与防护, 2013,34(9): 771-774.
【15】四川石油管道局勘察设计研究院. 埋地钢质管道阴极保护参数测试方法:SY/T 0023-1997[S]. 北京:石油工业出版社,1997.
【16】LINDEMUTH D, CRABTREE D. AC and DC stray current mitigation and corrosion control for a new urban pipeline[C]//Corrosion 2012. Atlanta, TX: NACE, 2012.
【17】韩雪. 直流杂散电流下埋地金属管线的腐蚀与防护研究[D]. 东营: 中国石油大学(华东), 2015.
【18】王芷芳,朱安纲. 埋地钢质管道阴极保护电位测量中的IR降及其修正[J]. 腐蚀与防护,2003,24(3):110-112,118.
【19】李自力,谢跃辉,郝宏娜,等. 埋地管道阴极保护电位测量方法研究进展[J]. 腐蚀与防护,2012,33(1):55-59.
【2】计雪松, 秦朝葵. 杂散电流对埋地燃气管道的腐蚀及其监测[J]. 上海煤气, 2007(4): 12-15, 46.
【3】刘文权. 城市地铁杂散电流对埋地输油管道的危害[J]. 全面腐蚀控制, 2014,28(11): 29-32.
【4】颜达峰,刘乃勇,袁鹏斌,等. 地铁维修基地杂散电流对埋地钢质管道的腐蚀及防护措施[J]. 腐蚀与防护, 2013, 34(8): 739-742.
【5】高玉珍. 轨交杂散电流对天然气主干网的腐蚀影响及防护探究[J]. 上海煤气, 2016(2): 6-11, 31.
【6】徐颢, 李代莉. 轨道交通直流杂散电流给埋地钢管防腐系统带来的新风险[J]. 城市燃气, 2016(3): 12-17.
【7】吴祥祖,张庆贺,高卫平. 地铁杂散电流产生机理及其防护措施[J]. 建筑安全,2003(5): 28-30.
【8】ZAKOWSKI K, DAROWICKI K, ORLIKOWSKI J, et al. Electrolytic corrosion of water pipeline system in the remote distance from stray currents: case study[J]. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2016, 4: 116-124.
【9】ROGELIO DE LAS C, RON T, KRISTI R. Dynamic stray current interference testing and mitigation design for a 90-inch water main[C]//Corroson 2009. Atlanta, GA: NACE, 2009: 09547.
【10】陈志光, 秦朝葵, 夏沁. 轨道交通杂散电流对埋地燃气管道影响的实验研究[J]. 世界科技研究与发展, 2012, 34(5): 740-742.
【11】QIAN S, CHENGYF. Accelerated corrosion of pipeline steel and reduced cathodic protection effectiveness under direct current interference[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 148: 675-685.
【12】王力伟,唐兴华,王新华,等. 基于分形的管线钢直流杂散电流腐蚀行为[J]. 腐蚀与防护,2014,35(3): 218-223.
【13】王新华,刘菊银,何仁洋,等. 轨道交通动态杂散电流对埋地管道的干扰腐蚀试验[J]. 腐蚀与防护,2010,31(3):193-197.
【14】张玉星, 杜艳霞, 路民旭. 动态直流杂散电流干扰下埋地管道的腐蚀行为[J]. 腐蚀与防护, 2013,34(9): 771-774.
【15】四川石油管道局勘察设计研究院. 埋地钢质管道阴极保护参数测试方法:SY/T 0023-1997[S]. 北京:石油工业出版社,1997.
【16】LINDEMUTH D, CRABTREE D. AC and DC stray current mitigation and corrosion control for a new urban pipeline[C]//Corrosion 2012. Atlanta, TX: NACE, 2012.
【17】韩雪. 直流杂散电流下埋地金属管线的腐蚀与防护研究[D]. 东营: 中国石油大学(华东), 2015.
【18】王芷芳,朱安纲. 埋地钢质管道阴极保护电位测量中的IR降及其修正[J]. 腐蚀与防护,2003,24(3):110-112,118.
【19】李自力,谢跃辉,郝宏娜,等. 埋地管道阴极保护电位测量方法研究进展[J]. 腐蚀与防护,2012,33(1):55-59.
相关信息