Cause Analysis on Thread Leakage of NC50 Drill Pipe Joint in a Well
摘 要
某批使用后的钻杆接头在进行无损探伤时发现裂纹和刺漏。通过宏观观察、磁粉探伤分析、化学成分分析、力学性能测试、金相检验、断口分析等方法对接头出现裂纹和刺漏的原因进行了分析。结果表明:钻井时由于钻杆接头上扣扭矩不足,造成主台肩面接触压力较小,内外螺纹配合松散产生动态载荷,螺纹牙底应力分布发生变化,局部应力集中加剧,造成其疲劳强度下降并在螺纹牙底形成疲劳裂纹源,在拉伸载荷作用下裂纹进一步扩展并穿透到接头螺纹内壁,导致内部高压泥浆液从副台肩和贯穿裂纹流入螺纹通道,并由失去密封性的主台肩面冲出并冲刷腐蚀,最终导致接头出现刺漏失效。
Abstract
Some cracks and punctures were found out when a patch of used drill pipe joints were detected with nondestructive testing method. By means of macroscopic observation, magnetic particle inspection, chemical composition analysis, mechanical property test, metallographic examination and fracture analysis, the causes of crack and leakage of the joints were analyzed. The results show that during drilling, due to the insufficient upper buckle torque of the drill pipe joints, the contact pressure of the main shoulder surface was small, the internal and external threads were loose to produce dynamic load, the stress distribution of the threads bottom changed, the local stress concentration intensified, the fatigue strength decreased, the fatigue crack source formed at the thread bottom, and the crack further expanded and penetrated under the tensile load. The inner wall of the joint thread caused the internal high-pressure mud liquid to flow into the thread channel from the auxiliary shoulder and through cracks, and the main shoulder surface which lost the sealing property rushed out and washed out and corrodes, finally leading to the joint leakage failure.
中图分类号 TH142.2 DOI 10.11973/lhjy-wl202003018
所属栏目 质量控制与失效分析
基金项目
收稿日期 2019/6/12
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
备注陈猛(1985-),男,工程师,主要从事石油管材失效分析和研发工作,hengmingchen@163.com
引用该论文: CHEN Meng,YU Shijie,OUYANG Zhiying,XU Changxue. Cause Analysis on Thread Leakage of NC50 Drill Pipe Joint in a Well[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis part A:Physical Testing, 2020, 56(3): 68~74
陈猛,余世杰,欧阳志英,徐昌学. 某井NC50钻杆接头螺纹刺漏原因分析[J]. 理化检验-物理分册, 2020, 56(3): 68~74
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】谷振乾,张新胜,王永江,等. 5-1/2FH双台肩钻杆内螺纹接头断裂原因分析[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2011,47(9):575-578.
【2】余世杰,孙小林,袁鹏斌. 钻杆接头倒角台肩面裂纹产生原因分析[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2017,53(7):524-527.
【3】吕拴录. 钻杆NC50内螺纹接头裂纹原因分析[J]. 石油钻采工艺,2008,30(6):104-107.
【4】余世杰,欧阳志英,龚丹梅,等. 某油田钻铤断裂失效原因分析[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2019,55(3):200-203.
【5】陈松林. 钻杆螺纹失效分析及改进措施研究[D]. 重庆:重庆大学,2008.
【6】张根旺,党兰焕,罗冰. 钻杆内螺纹接头失效分析[J]. 钢管,2004,33(6):27-31.
【7】龚丹梅,余世杰,袁鹏斌,等. 双台肩钻杆接头刺漏原因分析[J]. 失效分析与预防,2014(2):104-109.
【8】龚丹梅,余世杰,袁鹏斌,等. G105钢级钻杆外螺纹接头裂纹原因分析[J]. 石油矿场机械,2014(10):39-44.
【9】廖凌,崔顺贤,叶顶鹏,等. 钻杆接头台肩根部刺漏失效分析[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2009,45(7):434-436.
【2】余世杰,孙小林,袁鹏斌. 钻杆接头倒角台肩面裂纹产生原因分析[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2017,53(7):524-527.
【3】吕拴录. 钻杆NC50内螺纹接头裂纹原因分析[J]. 石油钻采工艺,2008,30(6):104-107.
【4】余世杰,欧阳志英,龚丹梅,等. 某油田钻铤断裂失效原因分析[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2019,55(3):200-203.
【5】陈松林. 钻杆螺纹失效分析及改进措施研究[D]. 重庆:重庆大学,2008.
【6】张根旺,党兰焕,罗冰. 钻杆内螺纹接头失效分析[J]. 钢管,2004,33(6):27-31.
【7】龚丹梅,余世杰,袁鹏斌,等. 双台肩钻杆接头刺漏原因分析[J]. 失效分析与预防,2014(2):104-109.
【8】龚丹梅,余世杰,袁鹏斌,等. G105钢级钻杆外螺纹接头裂纹原因分析[J]. 石油矿场机械,2014(10):39-44.
【9】廖凌,崔顺贤,叶顶鹏,等. 钻杆接头台肩根部刺漏失效分析[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2009,45(7):434-436.
相关信息