Influence of Residual Stress on Measurement of Elastic Modulus by Oliver-Pharr Method
摘 要
Oliver-Pharr方法是利用纳米压痕测量材料弹性模量最常用的方法。选用石英和铝合金两种材料,采用数值模拟法研究材料内部残余应力对Oliver-Pharr方法测量弹性模量的影响。结果表明:由于铝合金在压入过程容易产生pile-up突起现象,Oliver-Pharr方法测量铝合金材料的弹性模量在无残余应力状态下误差较大,当有残余压应力时误差高达41.3%;对于石英材料,Oliver-Pharr方法测量石英材料弹性模量在无残余应力时误差为0.9%,残余拉、压应力都会产生较大的误差。Oliver-Pharr方法在无残余应力时测量类似石英这种较硬材料的弹性模量具有更好的识别精度,而对铝合金这类较软的材料则不适用。在利用纳米压痕法测量材料弹性模量时应充分考虑残余应力的影响。
Abstract
It is common to use the Oliver-Pharr method to measure the elastic modulus of materials by nanoindentation. Numerical simulation methods were used to study the influence of the residual stress on the measurement of the elastic modulus when using the Oliver-Pharr method. Fused silica material and aluminum alloy material were selected in this study. The results show that due to the pile-up effect of aluminum alloy material during the indentation process, it had large error when measuring the elastic modulus of aluminum alloy material without the residual stress. Especially, the error caused by compressive residual stress was as high as 41. 3%. On the contrary, it had an error of 0. 9% when measuring the elastic modulus of the fused silica material without the residual stress. However, the stress state of tensile and compressive residual stress will both caused large error when using the Oliver-Pharr method. The Oliver-Pharr method had better recognition accuracy when measuring the elastic modulus of harder materials like fused silica when there was no residual stress, but it was no longer applicable to softer materials such as aluminum alloy. It was advised that the effect of residual stress should be fully considered when measuring elastic modulus of materials by the nanoindentation method.
中图分类号 TG115.5 DOI 10.11973/lhjy-wl202010001
所属栏目 试验与研究
基金项目 山西省应用基础研究项目(面上青年基金项目)(201701D221008);太原科技大学校博士启动项目(20172008)
收稿日期 2019/11/13
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
备注常超(1986-),男,副教授,主要从事材料在微、纳米尺度下的力学性能研究,cc@tyust.edu.cn
引用该论文: CHANG Chao,GAO Liangliang,YE Qihua. Influence of Residual Stress on Measurement of Elastic Modulus by Oliver-Pharr Method[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis part A:Physical Testing, 2020, 56(10): 1~4
常超,高亮亮,叶启华. 残余应力对Oliver-Pharr方法测量弹性模量的影响[J]. 理化检验-物理分册, 2020, 56(10): 1~4
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】张泰华,杨业敏,赵亚溥,等.MEMS材料力学性能的测试技术[J].力学进展,2002,32(4):545-562.
【2】刘燕,汤杰,苏成功,等.连续球压痕法测试钢管应变时效后拉伸强度的变化[J].理化检验(物理分册),2016,52(2):77-82.
【3】郝建群,周储伟,倪阳,等.铝合金冲击凹坑残余应力显微压痕测定方法[J].理化检验(物理分册),2019,55(4):226-231.
【4】任丽萍,吴益文,陈庆东,等.金属材料压痕微区力学性能试验[J].理化检验(物理分册),2018,54(2):108-110.
【5】得彬,王先锋.仪器化压痕技术测试拉伸性能的重复性和准确性[J].理化检验(物理分册),2017,53(7):491-495.
【6】OLIVER W C,PHARR G M. Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation:Advances in understanding and refinements to methodology[J].Journal of Materials Research. 2004,19(1):3-20.
【2】刘燕,汤杰,苏成功,等.连续球压痕法测试钢管应变时效后拉伸强度的变化[J].理化检验(物理分册),2016,52(2):77-82.
【3】郝建群,周储伟,倪阳,等.铝合金冲击凹坑残余应力显微压痕测定方法[J].理化检验(物理分册),2019,55(4):226-231.
【4】任丽萍,吴益文,陈庆东,等.金属材料压痕微区力学性能试验[J].理化检验(物理分册),2018,54(2):108-110.
【5】得彬,王先锋.仪器化压痕技术测试拉伸性能的重复性和准确性[J].理化检验(物理分册),2017,53(7):491-495.
【6】OLIVER W C,PHARR G M. Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation:Advances in understanding and refinements to methodology[J].Journal of Materials Research. 2004,19(1):3-20.
相关信息