Fluctuation Regularity of Stray Current Interference from Rail Transit to Wuhan Gas Pipelines
摘 要
对武汉轨道交通动态直流干扰下的燃气管道的管地电位进行了24 h连续监测,对其干扰进行风险评估,并利用傅里叶变换对数据进行频域分析,统计了杂散电流干扰下管地电位波动的频率、分布、幅值等动态特征。结果表明:燃气管道处于高直流干扰风险区的有20处,低风险区域的有7处;受有轨电车干扰管地电位波动存在明显间歇性,一个间歇期为130~140 s,而地铁无明显间歇期;各轨道交通线路引起的波动频率不尽相同,但是50%以上的波动频率集中在0.005~0.03 Hz。
Abstract
The pipe-to-soil potentials of the gas pipelines under the dynamic DC interference of Wuhan rail transit were continuously monitored for 24 h. The interference risk was evaluated and Fourier transform was used to analyze the data in frequency domain. The frequency, distribution, amplitude and other dynamic characteristics of pipe-to-soil potential fluctuation under the interference of stray current were analyzed. The results show that there were 20 points of gas pipelines in high DC interference risk zone and 7 points in low risk zone. The fluctuation of pipe-to-soil potentials under the interference of trams was intermittent, an entire intermittency period was 130-140 s, but it was not intermittent under the interference of metros. Though the fluctuation frequency caused by various rail transit lines was different, more than 50% fluctuation frequency was concentrated in 0.005-0.03 Hz.
中图分类号 DOI 10.11973/fsyfh-202012008
所属栏目 应用技术
基金项目
收稿日期 2019/2/28
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
引用该论文: XIAO Song,JIANG Zitao,TONG Qinfu,WANG Hongxing,LI Bocong,CHEN Cheng. Fluctuation Regularity of Stray Current Interference from Rail Transit to Wuhan Gas Pipelines[J]. Corrosion & Protection, 2020, 41(12): 37
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】陈志光,秦朝葵,马飞. 轨道交通动态直流杂散电流检测及判定[J]. 煤气与热力,2011(10):35-39.
【2】CASAS R D L,Turner R,Kristi Roe. Dynamic stray current interference testing and mitigation design for a 90-inch water main[C]//Corroson 2009. Houston,TX:NACE Internal,2009:09547.
【3】孟庆思,杜艳霞,董亮,等. 埋地管道地铁杂散电流干扰的测试技术[J]. 腐蚀与防护,2016,37(5):355-359.
【4】王新华,刘菊银,何仁洋,等. 轨道交通动态杂散电流对埋地管道的干扰腐蚀试验[J]. 腐蚀与防护,2010,31(3):193-197.
【5】周宇,秦朝葵,陈志光. 轨道交通动态杂散电流干扰及傅里叶分析[J]. 煤气与热力,2013,33(2):28-32.
【6】MCCOLLUM B,AHLBORN G H. The influence of frequency of alternating and infrequently reversed current on electrolytic corrosion[J]. Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers,1916(1):301-345.
【2】CASAS R D L,Turner R,Kristi Roe. Dynamic stray current interference testing and mitigation design for a 90-inch water main[C]//Corroson 2009. Houston,TX:NACE Internal,2009:09547.
【3】孟庆思,杜艳霞,董亮,等. 埋地管道地铁杂散电流干扰的测试技术[J]. 腐蚀与防护,2016,37(5):355-359.
【4】王新华,刘菊银,何仁洋,等. 轨道交通动态杂散电流对埋地管道的干扰腐蚀试验[J]. 腐蚀与防护,2010,31(3):193-197.
【5】周宇,秦朝葵,陈志光. 轨道交通动态杂散电流干扰及傅里叶分析[J]. 煤气与热力,2013,33(2):28-32.
【6】MCCOLLUM B,AHLBORN G H. The influence of frequency of alternating and infrequently reversed current on electrolytic corrosion[J]. Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers,1916(1):301-345.
相关信息