Circumferential Corrosion Test of Steel Strand Bundle Based on Metal Magnetic Memory
摘 要
针对常规技术难以高效检测桥梁斜拉索内部腐蚀的问题,探讨了拉索腐蚀与环向漏磁信号的关系,采用钢绞线束模拟工程常用的平行钢绞线索,设计了不同腐蚀程度及腐蚀位置的单点腐蚀和两点腐蚀检测试验,绘制出钢绞线束环向漏磁信号雷达图并分析了其规律特征。结果表明:单点腐蚀处的环向漏磁信号雷达图出现异常极大值,且腐蚀程度与极值呈正相关性;当两腐蚀点沿环向相邻时,雷达图呈“异常凸起状”;当两腐蚀点沿径向相邻时,雷达图分布均匀呈“水滴状”;当两腐蚀点分布在对角时,雷达图呈“缺口状”;根据各图像特征的显著差异,可判断单点腐蚀的环向位置和两点腐蚀的相对位置分布,由此提出了基于“3D雷达图”的斜拉索腐蚀位置检测方法。
Abstract
It is difficult to effectively detect the internal corrosion of bridge stay cables by conventional technology. Aiming at the problem, the relationship between the corrosion of stay cables and the circumferential magnetic flux leakage signal is discussed in this paper. The steel strand bundles were used to simulate the parallel steel strand cables in practical engineering. The detection experimental study on the single and two corrosion points were designed under different corrosion degrees and corrosion location distributions. The circumferential magnetic flux leakage signals of steel strand bundles were plotted into radar images for analysis. The results showed that the radar image of circumferential magnetic flux leakage exhibited abnormal maximum at the single corrosion point, and the corrosion degree was positively correlated with the extreme value. When two corrosion points were adjacent along the circumferential direction, the radar image was presented as "abnormally convex". When two corrosion points were adjacent along the radial direction, the radar image was evenly distributed as "water drop". When two corrosion points were distributed diagonally, the radar image was similar to "notch". According to the obvious differences of each image feature, the circumferential position of single-point corrosion and the relative position distribution of two-point corrosion could be judged. Moreover, a detection method of the cable corrosion position based on "3D radar image" was proposed.
中图分类号 TG174.3 DOI 10.11973/fsyfh-202210006
所属栏目 试验研究
基金项目 国家自然科学基金(51808081,U20A20314);重庆市杰出青年科学基金(cstc2020jcyj-jqX0006);重庆市城市管理科研项目(城管科字2019第25号)
收稿日期 2021/4/7
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
引用该论文: ZHANG Hong,LI Houxuan,YANG Wenqi,XIA Runchuan,ZHOU Jianting. Circumferential Corrosion Test of Steel Strand Bundle Based on Metal Magnetic Memory[J]. Corrosion & Protection, 2022, 43(10): 38
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】梁雄. 斜拉桥拉索腐蚀行为及使用寿命预测研究[D]. 重庆:重庆交通大学, 2008.
【2】刘红彬, 李玲, 袁则循. 斜拉索检测和监测技术的述评[J]. 四川建筑科学研究, 2016, 42(1):45-49.
【3】蔡步文. 基于图像处理的斜拉桥缆索表面缺陷检测的研究[D]. 重庆:重庆大学, 2010.
【4】李冬生, 胡倩, 李惠, 等. 多龄期桥梁斜拉索疲劳损伤演化声发射监测技术研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2012, 31(4):67-71.
【5】RAIŠUTIS R, KAŽYS R, MAŽEIKA L, et al. Ultrasonic guided wave-based testing technique for inspection of multi-wire rope structures[J]. NDT and E International, 2014, 62:40-49.
【6】LI X, GAO C, GUO Y, et al. Cable surface damage detection in cable-stayed bridges using optical techniques and image mosaicking[J]. Optics and Laser Technology, 2019, 110:36-43.
【7】张申林, 余剑武. 桥梁拉索检测机器人的爬升机构设计[D]. 湖南:湖南大学, 2014.
【8】俞建群, 张海良, 汤亮, 等. 光纤检测技术在斜拉索上的应用[J]. 金属制品, 2020, 46(3):49-53.
【9】HO H N, KIM K D, PARK Y S, et al. An efficient image-based damage detection for cable surface in cable-stayed bridges[J]. NDT & E International, 2013, 58:18-23.
【10】辛荣亚, 张启伟. 基于漏磁检测的桥梁拉索钢丝损伤评估[J]. 桥梁建设, 2019, 49(3):51-56.
【11】杨宁祥, 刘秀成, 陈英红, 等. 斜拉索表层断丝缺陷漏磁检测圆环阵列传感器[J]. 仪器仪表学报, 2019, 40(4):126-131.
【12】CHRISTEN R, BERGAMINI A, MOTAVALLI M. Influence of steel wrapping on magneto-inductive testing of the main cables of suspension bridges[J]. NDT & E International, 2009, 42(1):22-27.
【13】李志刚. 基于金属磁记忆的拉索断丝监测技术研究[D]. 重庆:重庆交通大学, 2016.
【14】赵亚宇, 周建庭, 夏润川, 等. 基于磁记忆弱漏磁效应的钢绞线腐蚀检测[J]. 深圳大学学报(理工版), 2019, 36(3):260-267.
【15】XIA R, ZHOU J, ZHANG H, et al. Experimental study on corrosion of unstressed steel strand based on metal magnetic memory[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2019, 23(3):1320-1329.
【16】周建庭, 杨文琦, 夏润川, 等. 镀锌钢绞线断丝的自发漏磁检测试验[J]. 江苏大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 40(6):713-718.
【17】吴大波, 徐敏强. 金属磁记忆技术的机理与试验研究[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2012, 44(11):36-39.
【18】金宝. 铁磁材料的磁记忆效应机理研究[D]. 天津:天津大学大学, 2014.
【19】时朋朋. 缺陷漏磁场磁偶极子模型的若干解析解[J]. 无损检测, 2015, 37(3):1-7.
【2】刘红彬, 李玲, 袁则循. 斜拉索检测和监测技术的述评[J]. 四川建筑科学研究, 2016, 42(1):45-49.
【3】蔡步文. 基于图像处理的斜拉桥缆索表面缺陷检测的研究[D]. 重庆:重庆大学, 2010.
【4】李冬生, 胡倩, 李惠, 等. 多龄期桥梁斜拉索疲劳损伤演化声发射监测技术研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2012, 31(4):67-71.
【5】RAIŠUTIS R, KAŽYS R, MAŽEIKA L, et al. Ultrasonic guided wave-based testing technique for inspection of multi-wire rope structures[J]. NDT and E International, 2014, 62:40-49.
【6】LI X, GAO C, GUO Y, et al. Cable surface damage detection in cable-stayed bridges using optical techniques and image mosaicking[J]. Optics and Laser Technology, 2019, 110:36-43.
【7】张申林, 余剑武. 桥梁拉索检测机器人的爬升机构设计[D]. 湖南:湖南大学, 2014.
【8】俞建群, 张海良, 汤亮, 等. 光纤检测技术在斜拉索上的应用[J]. 金属制品, 2020, 46(3):49-53.
【9】HO H N, KIM K D, PARK Y S, et al. An efficient image-based damage detection for cable surface in cable-stayed bridges[J]. NDT & E International, 2013, 58:18-23.
【10】辛荣亚, 张启伟. 基于漏磁检测的桥梁拉索钢丝损伤评估[J]. 桥梁建设, 2019, 49(3):51-56.
【11】杨宁祥, 刘秀成, 陈英红, 等. 斜拉索表层断丝缺陷漏磁检测圆环阵列传感器[J]. 仪器仪表学报, 2019, 40(4):126-131.
【12】CHRISTEN R, BERGAMINI A, MOTAVALLI M. Influence of steel wrapping on magneto-inductive testing of the main cables of suspension bridges[J]. NDT & E International, 2009, 42(1):22-27.
【13】李志刚. 基于金属磁记忆的拉索断丝监测技术研究[D]. 重庆:重庆交通大学, 2016.
【14】赵亚宇, 周建庭, 夏润川, 等. 基于磁记忆弱漏磁效应的钢绞线腐蚀检测[J]. 深圳大学学报(理工版), 2019, 36(3):260-267.
【15】XIA R, ZHOU J, ZHANG H, et al. Experimental study on corrosion of unstressed steel strand based on metal magnetic memory[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2019, 23(3):1320-1329.
【16】周建庭, 杨文琦, 夏润川, 等. 镀锌钢绞线断丝的自发漏磁检测试验[J]. 江苏大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 40(6):713-718.
【17】吴大波, 徐敏强. 金属磁记忆技术的机理与试验研究[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2012, 44(11):36-39.
【18】金宝. 铁磁材料的磁记忆效应机理研究[D]. 天津:天津大学大学, 2014.
【19】时朋朋. 缺陷漏磁场磁偶极子模型的若干解析解[J]. 无损检测, 2015, 37(3):1-7.
相关信息