Comparison and analysis of three time-base linear test methods in GB/T 27664 standard
摘 要
超声检测设备的时基线性直接影响缺陷定位的准确度。标准GB/T 27664.1-2011仪器部分的8.7节和9.6节,以及GB/T 27664.3-2012组合设备部分的3.2节指出了测试时基线性的不同方法。采用了标准中提出的3种不同方法对同一台超声检测仪的时基线性进行测试,对这3种时基线性的测试方法做出了详细对比。结果表明,标准中仪器部分8.7节的方法适用于数字式超声检测仪,其验收标准为时基线性偏差小于全屏宽度的±0.5%;9.6节的方法适用于A型脉冲式模拟和数字式超声检测仪,验收标准为时基线性偏差小于全屏宽度的±1%;组合设备部分3.2节的方法适用于现场或车间条件使用的超声仪器和探头组合设备,验收标准为时基线性偏差小于全屏宽度的±2%。
Abstract
For ultrasonic testing equipment, the linearity of time base directly affects the accuracy of defect location determination. Three test methods are described in the term 8. 7 and term 9. 6 of GB/T 27664. 1-2011, as well as in the term 3. 2 of GB/T 27664. 3-2012. The above-mentioned three ways were used to conduct testing and make comparison on the linearity of time base of the same digital ultrasonic instrument. The results showed that term 8. 7 is applicable to the measurement of digital ultrasonic instrument, with which the acceptance standard is within ±0. 5% of the full screen width; the term 9. 6 can be applied to the A-type pulse analogue and digital ultrasonic instrument, with which the acceptance standard is within ±1% of the full screen width; and the term 3. 2 is suitable for the ultrasonic instruments combined with detector practically used on site or in plants, with which the acceptance criteria is within ±2% of full screen width.
中图分类号 TG115.28 DOI 10.11973/wsjc202211014
所属栏目 标准化
基金项目 湖北特种设备检验检测研究院科研项目(2021第5号)
收稿日期 2022/2/16
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
联系人作者谭凯(346090321@qq.com)
备注谭凯(1985-),男,博士,主要从事特种设备检验技术研究工作
引用该论文: TAN Kai,YANG Tuo,LI Qunke,LI Changsheng,CHEN Yuyi,YANG Wenrui. Comparison and analysis of three time-base linear test methods in GB/T 27664 standard[J]. Nondestructive Testing, 2022, 44(11): 65~68
谭凯,杨拓,李群科,李昌胜,陈昱亦,杨文睿. GB/T 27664标准中3种时基线性测试方法的对比分析[J]. 无损检测, 2022, 44(11): 65~68
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】潘强华,郑晖,张君娇,等.国内外超声检测仪器测试与评价标准的比较与分析[J].无损检测,2017,39(3):5-9,54.
相关信息