Fracture causes of electric rear axle housing
摘 要
某公司生产的电动后桥壳在台架试验及路试过程中多次出现断裂,且断裂均发生于包壳与套管的环焊缝处。采用宏观观察、扫描电镜分析、化学成分分析、金相检验、焊缝熔深测试、有限元仿真分析等方法,对该电动后桥壳断裂的原因进行分析。结果表明:后桥壳包壳与套管的内径不一致,拼装后衬套台阶与包壳间存在间隙,导致包壳无法被完全焊透,在端面形成了尖角,尖角处产生的应力集中是导致后桥壳断裂的主要原因。建议优化设计方案,将包壳与套管间内错边的设计更改为外错边,取消衬套台阶并减小衬套开口,消除断面尖角,防止应力集中。
Abstract
The electric rear axle housings proucluced by a company fractured many times during bench test and road test, and the fracture occurred at the circumferential weld between the cladding and the casing. The causes of the electric rear axle housing fracture were analyzed by macroscopic observation, scanning electron microscopy analysis, chemical composition analysis, metallographic examination, weld penetration inspection, finite element simulation analysis and other methods. The results show that the inner diameter of the cladding and casing of the rear axle housing was inconsistent. After assembly, there was a gap between the bushing step and the cladding, which caused the cladding to be unable to be fully welded, and sharp corners were formed on the end face. The stress concentration at the sharp corners was the main reason for the fracture of the rear axle housing. It was suggested to optimize the design scheme, changed the design of internal misalignment between the cladding and the casing to external misalignment, cancelled the bushing steps and reduced the bushing opening, eliminated the sharp corner of the section, and prevented stress concentration.
中图分类号 TB31 DOI 10.11973/lhjy-wl202301021
所属栏目 质量控制与失效分析
基金项目
收稿日期 2022/3/26
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
备注梁良(1989-),男,学士,助理工程师,主要从事金属材料检测与零部件失效分析工作
引用该论文: LIANG Liang,ZHUGE Liuying. Fracture causes of electric rear axle housing[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis part A:Physical Testing, 2023, 59(1): 75~78
梁良,诸葛六英. 电动后桥壳断裂原因[J]. 理化检验-物理分册, 2023, 59(1): 75~78
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】徐明琦,王学双,李易航,等. 商用车车桥疲劳断裂失效原因分析[J]. 汽车工艺与材料,2020(12):29-31.
【2】宋起峰,刘柯军,乔小兵,等. 冲焊桥壳疲劳寿命影响因素分析[J]. 汽车工艺与材料,2012(2):31-33.
【3】李亮,宋健,文凌波,等. 商用车驱动桥壳疲劳寿命的有限元仿真与实验分析[J]. 机械强度,2008,30(3):503-507.
【4】杨晓峰,高斌强,吕海英. S135钻杆摩擦焊焊缝区冲击韧性低的原因[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2021,57(7):15-19.
【5】张栋,钟培道,陶春虎,等. 失效分析[M]. 北京:国防工业出版社,2004.
【2】宋起峰,刘柯军,乔小兵,等. 冲焊桥壳疲劳寿命影响因素分析[J]. 汽车工艺与材料,2012(2):31-33.
【3】李亮,宋健,文凌波,等. 商用车驱动桥壳疲劳寿命的有限元仿真与实验分析[J]. 机械强度,2008,30(3):503-507.
【4】杨晓峰,高斌强,吕海英. S135钻杆摩擦焊焊缝区冲击韧性低的原因[J]. 理化检验(物理分册),2021,57(7):15-19.
【5】张栋,钟培道,陶春虎,等. 失效分析[M]. 北京:国防工业出版社,2004.
相关信息