Corrosion Behavior of X65 Steel in Simulated Environments for Submarine Pipeline During Storage
摘 要
通过极化曲线、宏观腐蚀形貌、微观腐蚀形貌、腐蚀速率和三维点蚀形貌等,分析了X65钢在海水和淡水以及添加不同种类脱氧剂和缓蚀剂环境中的腐蚀行为。结果表明:在海水中添加缓蚀剂后,X65钢的自腐蚀电位最大正移量为11.6 mV,进一步添加脱氧剂后,其自腐蚀电位最大正移量为51.5 mV;随着浸泡时间的延长,试样表面生长出更为致密的腐蚀产物膜,最大点蚀速率从0.881 2 mm/a降至0.680 4 mm/a,该产物膜对试样表面起到保护作用;在海水中添加脱氧剂和缓蚀剂后,X65钢的最大点蚀速率下降至0.106 8 mm/a,进一步印证了脱氧剂和缓蚀剂的协同作用能更有效缓解溶解氧腐蚀,在X65钢海管封存过程中推荐添加脱氧剂+缓蚀剂HYH-80-SEA;常温下X65钢在海水中的腐蚀速率为淡水中的10倍,而在海水中添加脱氧剂和缓蚀剂HYH-80-SEA后,其腐蚀速率仍为淡水中的2~4倍。
Abstract
The corrosion behavior of X65 steel in seawater and freshwater and the addition of different kinds of deoxidizers and corrosion inhibitors was analyzed by polarization curve, macro corrosion morphology, micro corrosion morphology, corrosion rate and three-dimensional pitting morphology. The results showed that the maximum positive shift of self-corrosion potential of X65 steel was 11.6 mV after adding corrosion inhibitor in seawater, and the maximum positive shift of self-corrosion potential was 51.5 mV after further adding deoxidizer. With the extension of immersion time, a denser corrosion product film grew on surface of the sample, and the maximum pitting rate decreased from 0.881 2 mm/a to 0.680 4 mm/a, which played a protective role on surface of the sample. After adding deoxidizer and corrosion inhibitor in seawater, the maximum pitting corrosion rate of X65 steel decreased to 0.106 8 mm/a, which further confirmed that the synergistic effect of deoxidizer and corrosion inhibitor could effectively alleviate dissolved oxygen corrosion. It was recommended to add deoxidizer+corrosion inhibitor HYH-80-SEA in the storage process of X65 steel sea pipe. The corrosion rate of X65 steel in seawater was 10 times higher than that in freshwater at room temperature, while the corrosion rate of X65 steel in seawater was still 2-4 times higher than that in freshwater after adding deoxidizer and corrosion inhibitor HYH-80-SEA.
中图分类号 TG172 DOI 10.11973/fsyfh-202306004
所属栏目 试验研究
基金项目
收稿日期 2023/3/27
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
引用该论文: ZHANG Yanhua. Corrosion Behavior of X65 Steel in Simulated Environments for Submarine Pipeline During Storage[J]. Corrosion & Protection, 2023, 44(6): 17
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】杨怀玉,祝英剑,曹殿珍,等.海管在封存过程中的腐蚀及保护[J].腐蚀与防护,1995,16(5):224-226.
【2】何华坤.海底输油管道化学清洗和封存方法[J].科技创新导报,2019,16(10):24-25.
【3】申洪臣,李强,方明新,等.海底管线海水封存期的缓蚀剂筛选[J].腐蚀与防护,2014,35(11):1159-1162.
【4】谢协民,李晓磊,殷立云,等.海管管线封存期间缓蚀剂筛选[J].腐蚀与防护,2013,34(6):526-528.
【5】刘冰,熊开昱,尹晓鹏.高SRB环境下含油混输海管临时封存方案探索[J].石油和化工设备,2022,25(3):129-131.
【6】田亮.海管管线封存期间防腐措施研究[D].西安:西安石油大学,2015.
【7】董绍华,段宇航,孙伟栋,等.中国海底管道完整性评价技术发展现状及展望[J].油气储运,2020,39(12):1331-1336.
【8】吴修斌,李铭瑞,罗富先.复合缓蚀剂ZH-1在中原油田聚合物盐水泥浆中的应用[J].油田化学,1996,13(2):100-105.
【9】郭玉洁,文泽宙,孙海礁,等.除氧剂的添加对注气井油管管材腐蚀行为的影响[J].材料保护,2019,52(1):18-21.
【10】贺相军,王伟强,王美波.X65钢在不同介质中的电化学腐蚀特性研究[J].石油和化工设备,2009,12(4):49-52.
【11】曹楚南.腐蚀电化学原理[M].3版.北京:化学工业出版社,2008.
【2】何华坤.海底输油管道化学清洗和封存方法[J].科技创新导报,2019,16(10):24-25.
【3】申洪臣,李强,方明新,等.海底管线海水封存期的缓蚀剂筛选[J].腐蚀与防护,2014,35(11):1159-1162.
【4】谢协民,李晓磊,殷立云,等.海管管线封存期间缓蚀剂筛选[J].腐蚀与防护,2013,34(6):526-528.
【5】刘冰,熊开昱,尹晓鹏.高SRB环境下含油混输海管临时封存方案探索[J].石油和化工设备,2022,25(3):129-131.
【6】田亮.海管管线封存期间防腐措施研究[D].西安:西安石油大学,2015.
【7】董绍华,段宇航,孙伟栋,等.中国海底管道完整性评价技术发展现状及展望[J].油气储运,2020,39(12):1331-1336.
【8】吴修斌,李铭瑞,罗富先.复合缓蚀剂ZH-1在中原油田聚合物盐水泥浆中的应用[J].油田化学,1996,13(2):100-105.
【9】郭玉洁,文泽宙,孙海礁,等.除氧剂的添加对注气井油管管材腐蚀行为的影响[J].材料保护,2019,52(1):18-21.
【10】贺相军,王伟强,王美波.X65钢在不同介质中的电化学腐蚀特性研究[J].石油和化工设备,2009,12(4):49-52.
【11】曹楚南.腐蚀电化学原理[M].3版.北京:化学工业出版社,2008.
相关信息