Corrosin Risk Evaluation and Protection Measures of Pipeline Interfered by Metro Stray Current
摘 要
某输气管道受地铁杂散电流干扰影响,阴极保护电位波动大,且长时间正于-850 mV(相对于CSE),阴极保护系统受干扰严重,管道受阴极保护效果未知。为了解管道真实阴极保护状况,对沿线管道土壤电阻率进行测试,对管道通断电电位进行了24 h监测,确定了管道最小阴极保护电位,并评估了管道阴极保护状况。基于管道干扰风险分析结果,调整了阴极保护站输出参数,并开展了现场馈电试验。通过连续的馈电测试,获得了较优的干扰防护措施。
Abstract
A gas transmission pipeline was affected by the subway interference. The pipeline cathodic protection potential fluctuated greatly and was positive than -850 mV(compared to CSE) for a long time. As a result, the cathodic protection system was seriously interfered, and the effect of cathodic protection on the pipeline was unknown. In order to know the real cathodic protection status of the pipeline, the soil resistivity was tested, and the pipeline potential were monitored for 24 hours, so as to determine the minimum cathodic protection potential value and evaluate the cathodic protection status of the pipeline. Based on the corrosion risk analysis results, the cathodic protection station running parameters were adjusted and continuous feeding tests were carried out. Through continuous field test, an optimized interference protection method was obtained.
中图分类号 TG174 DOI 10.11973/fsyfh-202306013
所属栏目 应用技术
基金项目
收稿日期 2022/2/16
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
引用该论文: ZHANG Mengmeng,XU Youpeng,HU Guibin,FENG Dejia,WU Guangchun,DU Xuelin,JIANG Yuanchao. Corrosin Risk Evaluation and Protection Measures of Pipeline Interfered by Metro Stray Current[J]. Corrosion & Protection, 2023, 44(6): 82
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】魏洲邦,刘广桥,曹刚.地铁杂散电流对埋地管道的影响与防护[J].全面腐蚀控制,2020,34(3)41-45.
【2】孟庆思,杜艳霞,董亮,等.埋地管道地铁杂散电流干扰的测试技术[J].腐蚀与防护,2016,37(5)355-359,380.
【3】刘瑶,谭松玲,邢琳琳,等.北京埋地燃气管道地铁杂散电流干扰影响现场检测及规律分析[J].腐蚀科学与防护技术,2019,31(4):429-435.
【4】马晓华.上海虹桥机场航油输送管道受地铁杂散电流干扰的检测与防护[J].腐蚀与防护,2016,37(5):364-367,406.
【5】刘杰,杜艳霞,覃慧敏,等.地铁杂散电流对埋地管道的干扰规律[J].腐蚀与防护,2019,40(1):43-47,70.
【6】王新华,刘菊银,何仁洋,等.轨道交通动态杂散电流对埋地管道的干扰腐蚀试验[J].腐蚀与防护,2010,31(3):193-197.
【7】戴舒,徐洪福,杜艳霞,等.供水管道动态杂散电流干扰腐蚀风险研究[J].中国给水排水,2016,32(11):58-60.
【8】肖嵩,姜子涛,童清福,等.轨道交通杂散电流对武汉燃气管道干扰的波动规律[J].腐蚀与防护,2020,41(12):37-43.
【9】唐德志,陈宏健,杜艳霞,等.地铁杂散电流干扰下埋地金属管道镁阳极排流技术研究[J].腐蚀科学与防护技术,2018,30(6):577-584.
【10】韩非.馈电试验在地铁杂散电流干扰排流中的应用[J].腐蚀与防护,2015,36(11):1101-1103,1108.
【11】朱振,向敏,陈啟斌,等.天然气管道受强烈地铁杂散电流干扰案例分析[J].腐蚀与防护,2021,42(8)69-75.
【2】孟庆思,杜艳霞,董亮,等.埋地管道地铁杂散电流干扰的测试技术[J].腐蚀与防护,2016,37(5)355-359,380.
【3】刘瑶,谭松玲,邢琳琳,等.北京埋地燃气管道地铁杂散电流干扰影响现场检测及规律分析[J].腐蚀科学与防护技术,2019,31(4):429-435.
【4】马晓华.上海虹桥机场航油输送管道受地铁杂散电流干扰的检测与防护[J].腐蚀与防护,2016,37(5):364-367,406.
【5】刘杰,杜艳霞,覃慧敏,等.地铁杂散电流对埋地管道的干扰规律[J].腐蚀与防护,2019,40(1):43-47,70.
【6】王新华,刘菊银,何仁洋,等.轨道交通动态杂散电流对埋地管道的干扰腐蚀试验[J].腐蚀与防护,2010,31(3):193-197.
【7】戴舒,徐洪福,杜艳霞,等.供水管道动态杂散电流干扰腐蚀风险研究[J].中国给水排水,2016,32(11):58-60.
【8】肖嵩,姜子涛,童清福,等.轨道交通杂散电流对武汉燃气管道干扰的波动规律[J].腐蚀与防护,2020,41(12):37-43.
【9】唐德志,陈宏健,杜艳霞,等.地铁杂散电流干扰下埋地金属管道镁阳极排流技术研究[J].腐蚀科学与防护技术,2018,30(6):577-584.
【10】韩非.馈电试验在地铁杂散电流干扰排流中的应用[J].腐蚀与防护,2015,36(11):1101-1103,1108.
【11】朱振,向敏,陈啟斌,等.天然气管道受强烈地铁杂散电流干扰案例分析[J].腐蚀与防护,2021,42(8)69-75.
相关信息