Test method and uncertainty evaluation of the maximum force total elongation of HRB600 grade steel bars
摘 要
采用引伸计法与手工法对HRB600级钢筋的最大力总延伸率进行测试,分析了两种不同的测试方法对测试结果的影响,对手工法测试最大力总延伸率的不确定度进行了评定。结果表明:手工法测试最大力总延伸率的结果大于引伸计法测试最大力总延伸率的结果;测试位置对手工法的测试结果有较大的影响,随着与断口的距离逐渐增大,试样的最大力总延伸率逐渐变小;当区间的置信概率为95%时,手工法测试最大力总延伸率的不确定度评定结果为4%。
Abstract
The maximum force total elongation of HRB600 grade steel bars was tested using the extensometer method and the manual method. The impact of two different testing methods on the test results was analyzed, the uncertainty of the manual method for testing the maximum force total elongation was evaluated. The results show that the results of manual testing for maximum force total elongation were greater than those of extensometer testing for maximum force total elongation. The testing position had a significant impact on the testing results of the manual method. As the distance from the fracture gradually increased, the maximum force total elongation of sample gradually decreased. When the confidence probability of the interval was 95%, the uncertainty evaluation result of the manual method for testing the maximum force total elongation was 4%.
中图分类号 TB31 DOI 10.11973/lhjy-wl202307005
所属栏目 试验与研究
基金项目
收稿日期 2022/9/23
修改稿日期
网络出版日期
作者单位点击查看
备注吴伟(1985-),男,工程师,主要从事金属材料力学性能检测工作,wukun_00@sina.com
引用该论文: WU Wei,GUO Yuehua. Test method and uncertainty evaluation of the maximum force total elongation of HRB600 grade steel bars[J]. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis part A:Physical Testing, 2023, 59(7): 19~21
吴伟,郭跃华. HRB600级钢筋最大力总延伸率的测试方法及不确定度评定[J]. 理化检验-物理分册, 2023, 59(7): 19~21
共有人对该论文发表了看法,其中:
人认为该论文很差
人认为该论文较差
人认为该论文一般
人认为该论文较好
人认为该论文很好
参考文献
【1】孙福猛,何荣福,孙泽敏.依据GB/T 1499. 2—2018标准的最大力总延伸率验证试验[J].理化检验(物理分册),2022,58(4):16-18.
【2】赵同新,崔会杰,孙友宝,等.低合金钢中低含量元素的定量测试及不确定度评估[J].理化检验(物理分册),2022,58(11):25-27.
【2】赵同新,崔会杰,孙友宝,等.低合金钢中低含量元素的定量测试及不确定度评估[J].理化检验(物理分册),2022,58(11):25-27.
相关信息