Citation: | WANG Fei, YANG Chao, ZHANG Lidai, NI Jiekai, SHI Renqiang, LIU Deming. Reasons for low hardness test results of small diameter P91 steel pipeline[J]. PHYSICAL TESTING AND CHEMICAL ANALYSIS PART A:PHYSICAL TESTING, 2025, 61(3): 83-85. DOI: 10.11973/lhjy-wl230374 |
In the process of pre-installation inspection of a P91 steel pipe, the test results of the portable Leeb hardness tester were low. The reasons for the low hardness were analyzed by chemical composition analysis, hardness test, metallographic examination and other methods. The results show that the microstructure and hardness of the steel pipe did not meet the standard requirements and were unqualified products. The curvature and wall thickness of the sample were too small, the support ring was not used during the test, and the hardness conversion method was not correct, resulting in differences in the test results of the portable Leeb hardness tester.
[1] |
马加朋,盖红德,戴家辉,等 .超临界锅炉P91钢集箱局部硬度和金相组织异常原因分析[J].山东电力技术,2018,45(2):62-65.
|
[2] |
董鹏 .P91钢管硬度检测值偏低原因分析[J].内蒙古电力技术,2015,33(3):74-76.
|
[3] |
蔡文河,李炜丽,董树青,等 .关于T/P91钢和T/P92钢里氏硬度与布氏硬度换算差异性的物理学解释[J].理化检验(物理分册),2018,54(10):726-732.
|
[4] |
杨超,汤淳坡,孙雄 .低硬度P91钢管件布氏硬度转换值存在偏差原因分析[J].理化检验(物理分册),2015,51(9):608-611.
|
[5] |
代小号,欧阳杰,徐雪霞,等 .T91钢金相组织异常原因分析及建议[J].河北电力技术,2012,31(4):21-23.
|